ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Capsular warning syndrome (CWS) is a rare clinical syndrome characterised by recurrent and transient episodes of focal neurological deficits with high risk of infarction. The exact physiological mechanism of CWS remains unclear but is most commonly believed to be a result of haemodynamic insufficiency in diseased, small penetrating vessels. There are no defined treatment guidelines or established effective therapy. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe the case of a 65-year-old man who presented to the emergency department with recurrent episodes of dysarthria coupled with right facial droop and right-sided weakness. Symptoms recurred a total of ten times within a span of 3 h. He had new onset atrial fibrillation. An initial cerebral angiogram showed mild intracranial atherosclerotic disease with no proximal large vessel occlusion or acute infarct. Magnetic resonance imaging 1 h later demonstrated an infarct in the left corona radiata. CONCLUSIONS: This case illustrates an uncommon etiology of CWS. We will also discuss the lack of consensus in treatment options for CWS to mitigate a complete stroke.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate patients' dissatisfaction with overall and specific aspects of a tertiary glaucoma service and to determine their independent factors, including intraocular pressure (IOP) and visual acuity (VA). METHODS: Patients, aged ≥21 years, from a specialist glaucoma service in a tertiary eye hospital in Singapore for at least 6 months, were recruited for this cross-sectional study between March and June 2014. All consenting patients completed a 7-area glaucoma-specific satisfaction questionnaire and one item related to satisfaction with overall glaucoma care. We determined the top three areas of dissatisfaction and overall dissatisfaction with the glaucoma service. We also explored the independent factors associated with overall and specific areas of patients' dissatisfaction with their glaucoma care, including VA and IOP by using logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of the 518 patients recruited, 438 (84.6%) patients completed the study. Patients' dissatisfaction with the overall glaucoma service was 7.5%. The three areas of glaucoma service with the highest dissatisfaction rates were as follows: 1) explanation of test results (24.8%); 2) explanation of glaucoma complications (23.7%); and 3) advice on managing glaucoma (23.5%). Patients who were dissatisfied with the overall service had a worse mean VA compared with satisfied patients (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution =0.41±0.43 vs 0.27±0.49, p=0.005), whereas mean IOP remained well-controlled in both the groups (13.55±2.46 mmHg vs 14.82±2.86 mmHg, p=0.014). In adjusted models, factors associated with overall dissatisfaction with glaucoma care included a pre-university education and above (odds ratio [OR] =8.06, 95% CI =1.57-41.27) and lower IOP (OR =0.83, 95% CI =0.71-0.98). CONCLUSION: Although less than one tenth of glaucoma patients were dissatisfied with the overall glaucoma service, one in four patients were dissatisfied with three specific aspects of care. A lower IOP, ironically, and education level were associated with overall dissatisfaction. Improving patients' understanding of glaucoma test results, glaucoma complications, and disease management may increase patient satisfaction levels.
