ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Multimodal prehabilitation aims to prepare frail older patients for major surgery. The objective of this review is to determine the benefits of pre-operative multimodal prehabilitation compared to standard care in older patients. METHODS: Data sources included MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL and PsychINFO. They were searched from inception to September 2021. Only randomized controlled trials (RCT) with an average study population age ≥ 65 that had undergone major abdominal operation with at least two components (physical, nutritional, psychological) of prehabilitation programs were included. RESULTS: Nine RCTs were included with a total of 823 patients, of whom 705 completed the study with 358 undergoing prehabilitation and 347 were controls. Significantly lower complications were observed in the prehabilitation group compared to control (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.46 to 0.99; p = 0.04; I2 = 32%). A significant increase in 6-min walking distance (6MWD) from baseline to immediately prior to surgery (mean difference 35.1 m; 95%CI 11.6-58.4; p = 0.003; I2 = 67%) and 8 weeks post-surgery (mean difference 44.9 m; 95%CI 6.0-83.8; p = 0.02; I2 = 75%) was noted in the prehabilitation group. No difference was observed in length of stay (OR 0.59; 95% CI - 0.23 to 1.40; p = 0.16; I2 = 91%) or 30-day emergency department visit (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.41 to 1.26; p = 0.25; I2 = 0%). Patient reported outcome measures were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Amongst older patients, multimodal prehabilitation increases peri-operative functional capacity and may potentially decrease post-operative complications. Future studies should continue to focus on older patients who are frail as this is the group that prehabilitation would likely have a clinically significant impact on.
Subject(s)
Preoperative Care , Preoperative Exercise , Abdomen/surgery , Aged , Humans , Postoperative Complications/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Little evidence exists to guide the preoperative selection of elderly brain tumor patients who are fit for surgery. We aimed to evaluate the safety of brain tumor resection in geriatric patients and identify predictors of postoperative 30-day systemic complications. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 212 consecutive patients at or above the age of 60 years who underwent elective brain tumor resection between 2007 and 2017. The primary outcome measures analyzed were perioperative systemic complications within 30 days after the operation. A total of 212 geriatric brain tumor patients were included. Fifty-two (24.5%) had a 30-day systemic complication. Among them, 29 (13.7%) had systemic infections, 13 (6.1%) had perioperative seizures, 10 (4.7%) had syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH), five (2.4%) had deep venous thrombosis (DVT), four (1.9%) had perioperative stroke, three (1.4%) had acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and three (1.4%) had central nervous system (CNS) infections. One patient (0.5%) died. Perioperative stroke was predicted by previous stroke (p = 0.040), chronic liver disease (p < 0.001) and vestibular schwannoma (p = 0.002 with reference to meningiomas). Perioperative AMI was predicted by co-existing ischemic heart disease (p = 0.031). Systemic infection was predicted by female gender (p = 0.007) and preoperative Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score < 70 (p = 0.019). DVT was predicted by GBM (p = 0.014). In conclusion, brain tumor surgery can be safe in carefully-selected geriatric patients. The risk factors identified in this study would be helpful to select suitable candidates for surgery.
