The Effect of Temperature on Tactile Softness Perception.

We are adept at discriminating object properties such as softness and temperature using touch. Previous studies have investigated the nature of each object property, but the interactions between these properties are not fully understood. Tactile softness perception relies on multiple sensory cues such as the size of the contact area, indentation depth, and force exerted. In addition to these cues, the temperature of the stimulus may contribute to tactile softness perception by changing the sensitivity to changes in stimulus compliance. To test this hypothesis, we conducted two psychophysical experiments in which the subjects estimated the magnitude of perceived softness after touching deformable objects. We varied the compliance and temperature of the stimuli. The linear functions of compliance fit to the magnitude estimates under cold conditions (9-15°C) were steeper than the functions fit to the magnitude estimates under room temperature (21-25°C). These results indicate that temperature can sharpen our tactile softness perception of deformable surfaces by increasing the sensitivity to differences in compliance.

Physical correlates of human-like softness elicit high tactile pleasantness.

Touching an object can elicit affective sensations. Because these sensations are critical for social interaction, tactile preferences may be adapted to the characteristics of the human body. We have previously shown that compliance, a physical correlate of softness, increased the tactile pleasantness of a deformable surface. However, the extent to which object compliance similar to the human body elicits tactile pleasantness remains unknown. We addressed this question by using a wide range of compliances and by measuring the distribution of compliance of human body parts. The participants numerically estimated the perceived pleasantness or softness while pushing tactile stimuli with their right index fingers. The perceived softness monotonically increased with increasing compliance and then leveled off around the end of the stimulus range. By contrast, pleasantness showed an inverse U pattern as a function of compliance, reaching the maximum between 5 and 7 mm/N. This range of compliance was within that for both hand and arm. These results indicate that objects with similar compliance levels as those of human body parts yield the highest pleasantness when pushing them.

Tactile perception of pleasantness in relation to perceived softness.

The sense of touch allows us to infer objects' physical properties, while the same input also produces affective sensations. These affective sensations are important for interpersonal relationships and personal well-being, which raises the possibility that tactile preferences are adapted to the characteristics of the skin. Previous studies examined how physical properties such as surface roughness and temperature influence affective sensations; however, little is known about the effect of compliance (physical correlate of softness) on pleasantness. Thus, we investigated the psychophysical link between softness and pleasantness. Pieces of human skin-like rubber with different compliances were pressed against participants' fingers. Two groups of participants numerically estimated the perceived magnitude of either pleasantness or softness. The perceived magnitude of pleasantness and softness both increased monotonically as a function of increasing object compliance, levelling off at around the end of the stimulus range. However, inter-subject variability was greater for pleasantness than for perceived softness, whereas the slope of the linear function fit to the magnitude estimates was steeper for softness than for pleasantness. These results indicate that object compliance is a critical physical determinant for pleasantness, whereas the effect of compliance on pleasantness was more variable among individuals than the effect on softness was.