Cyclooxygenase-1 deletion enhances apoptosis but does not protect against ultraviolet light-induced tumors.

Inhibition or deletion of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 has been demonstrated to protect against squamous cell cancer in many studies. Although much effort has focused on COX-2 inhibition, recent work indicates that COX-1 deletion may be nearly as protective. In this study, we used SKH-1 hairless mice in which COX-1 was selectively deleted to examine the role of COX-1 in photocarcinogenesis. After UV exposure, 40-60% less prostaglandin E2 was detected in COX-1-/- animals compared with wild-type (WT) controls. A 4-fold induction of keratinocyte apoptosis was observed in knockouts relative to WT animals, as documented by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP nick end labeling and caspase-3 staining. Proliferation was not significantly different in COX-1+/+, COX-1+/-, and COX-1-/- animals. When susceptibility to UV-induced tumor formation was studied, tumor number, average tumor size, and time of tumor onset in COX-1-/- animals were identical to WT controls. Thus, enhanced apoptosis did not alter UV-induced skin carcinogenesis, suggesting other effects are key to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug chemoprevention. These results contrast sharply with data obtained using the classic 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene/12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate cancer model in which a prominent protective effect of COX-1-/- is present. The lack of protection observed here confirms cancer mechanisms are distinct in UV- and tumor promotor-induced cancer models and indicates that chemoprevention strategies must specifically address cancer causes to be effective.

Bacterial protease treatment of natural rubber latex alters its primary immunogenicity in a mouse model of sensitization.

The purpose of the present investigation was to determine whether enzyme-treated (ET)-NRL is less immunogenic than untreated NRL in a BALB/c mouse model of primary in vivo sensitization following repeated subcutaneous injections with the aqueous phase of ammoniated NRL or ET-NRL. Mice immunized with NRL produced IgE against NRL and ET-NRL, indicating that protease treatment did not completely destroy IgE antibody epitopes. In contrast, ET-NRL-immunized mice did not produce IgE against either NRL or ET-NRL, suggesting that enzyme treatment reduced the number of antigenic polypeptides associated with NRL below the threshold for sensitization. Thelper-lymphocytes from NRL-immunized mice proliferated and produced IL-4 when stimulated in vitro with polypeptides from NRL, but not ET-NRL. In contrast, Thelper-lymphocytes from ET-NRL-immunized mice were nonresponsive to ET-NRL or NRL. We conclude that lack of IgE production by ET-NRL-immunized mice is likely related to a lack of T-cell help in the form of IL-4, rather than enzyme digestion of IgE antibody epitopes. These data indicate that there is an immunologic rationale for production of enzyme-treated NRL-containing medical devices.