ABSTRACT
The use of ß-lactam (BL) and ß-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations, such as piperacillin-tazobactam (PIP-TAZ) is an effective strategy to combat infections by extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing bacteria. However, in Gram-negative bacteria, resistance (both mutational and adaptive) to BL-BLI combination can still develop through multiple mechanisms. These mechanisms may include increased ß-lactamase activity, reduced drug influx, and increased drug efflux. Understanding the relative contribution of these mechanisms during resistance development helps identify the most impactful mechanism to target in designing a treatment to counter BL-BLI resistance. This study used semi-mechanistic mathematical modeling in combination with antibiotic sensitivity assays to assess the potential impact of different resistance mechanisms during the development of PIP-TAZ resistance in a Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate expressing CTX-M-15 and SHV-1 ß-lactamases. The mathematical models were used to evaluate the potential impact of several cellular changes as a sole mediator of PIP-TAZ resistance. Our semi-mechanistic model identified 2 out of the 13 inspected mechanisms as key resistance mechanisms that may independently support the observed magnitude of PIP-TAZ resistance, namely porin loss and efflux pump up-regulation. Simulation using the resulting models also suggested the possible adjustment of PIP-TAZ dose outside its commonly used 8:1 dosing ratio. The current study demonstrated how theory-based mechanistic models informed by experimental data can be used to support hypothesis generation regarding potential resistance mechanisms, which may guide subsequent experimental studies.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Prediction of antimicrobial target-site pharmacokinetics is of relevance to optimize treatment with antimicrobial agents. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model framework was developed for prediction of pulmonary pharmacokinetics, including key pulmonary infection sites (i.e. the alveolar macrophages and the epithelial lining fluid). METHODS: The modelling framework incorporated three lung PBPK models: a general passive permeability-limited model, a drug-specific permeability-limited model and a quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR)-informed perfusion-limited model. We applied the modelling framework to three fluoroquinolone antibiotics. Incorporation of experimental drug-specific permeability data was found essential for accurate prediction. RESULTS: In the absence of drug-specific transport data, our QSPR-based model has generic applicability. Furthermore, we evaluated the impact of drug properties and pathophysiologically related changes on pulmonary pharmacokinetics. Pulmonary pharmacokinetics were highly affected by physiological changes, causing a shift in the main route of diffusion (i.e. paracellular or transcellular). Finally, we show that lysosomal trapping can cause an overestimation of cytosolic concentrations for basic compounds when measuring drug concentrations in cell homogenate. CONCLUSION: The developed lung PBPK model framework constitutes a promising tool for characterization of pulmonary exposure of systemically administrated antimicrobials.
