Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Exp Brain Res ; 235(2): 507-515, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27787583

ABSTRACT

Hick's law states that increasing the number of response alternatives increases reaction time. Lawrence and colleagues report an exception to the law, whereby more alternatives lead to shorter saccadic reaction times (SRTs). Usher and McClelland (Psychol Rev 108(3):550-592. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.550 , 2001) predict such an anti-Hick's effect when accuracy is not prioritized in a task, which should result in higher error rates with more response alternatives, and in turn to a shorter right tail of the SRT distribution. In the current study, we aim to replicate the original controversial findings and we compare them to these predictions by examining error rates and SRT distributions. Two experiments were conducted where participants made rapid eye movements to one of few or many alternatives. In Experiment 1, the saccade target was an onset and participants started either with few or many possible target locations and then alternated between conditions. An anti-Hick's effect emerged only when participants had started with a small set-size block. In Experiment 2, placeholders were displayed at the possible target locations and independent groups were used. A reliable anti-Hick's effect in SRTs was observed. However, results did not meet the stated predictions: anticipations and false direction errors were never more frequent when the set size was larger and SRT differences between the two set-size conditions were not more pronounced at the slower end of the distributions. In line with Lawrence and colleagues, we speculate that initial motor preparation, and the subsequent inhibition to counteract a premature response, may induce the anti-Hick's effect.


Subject(s)
Reaction Time/physiology , Saccades/physiology , Visual Perception/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Female , Humans , Male , Photic Stimulation , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Young Adult
2.
Biol Psychol ; 85(3): 481-6, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20883744

ABSTRACT

Preparatory modulations relative to the timing of upcoming stimuli may involve activation or suppression mechanisms. Here, we assessed the interplay between these mechanisms with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex. Single- or paired-pulse TMS with 3- or 15-ms interstimulus intervals was delivered during the interval between the warning and the imperative stimuli (i.e., the foreperiod) of a choice reaction time task. Temporal uncertainty was manipulated through between-block variation of the foreperiod duration (500 or 2500ms). The shortening of reaction time for the short foreperiod was accompanied with a decrease in amplitude of the single-pulse motor evoked potential (MEP), indicating corticospinal suppression. The co-occurring increase in amplitude of both paired-pulse MEPs (3 and 15ms) expressed relative to single-pulse MEPs reveals released short intracortical inhibition (SICI) and enhanced intracortical facilitation (ICF). These results suggest that temporal preparation is associated with both corticospinal suppression and cortical activation.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Cortex/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Neural Inhibition/physiology , Reaction Time/physiology , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , Adolescent , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Electromyography/methods , Female , Functional Laterality , Humans , Male , Nerve Net/physiology , Psychophysics , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Time Factors , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/classification , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Young Adult
3.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 116(1): 18-24, 2005 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15589178

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Surface Laplacian estimation enhances EEG spatial resolution. In this paper, we compare, on empirical grounds, two computationally different estimations of the surface Laplacian. METHODS: Surface Laplacian was estimated from the same monopolar data set with both Hjorth's method [local; Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 39 (1975) 526] as modified by MacKay [Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 56 (1983) 696] and with spherical spline interpolation [global; Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 72 (1989) 184]. RESULTS: The grand averages computed with the two methods proved to be very similar but differed markedly from the monopolar ones. The two different computations were highly correlated, presented low relative errors and allowed to evidence comparable experimental effects. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that Hjorth's method and spherical spline interpolation convey similar topographic and chronometric informations. SIGNIFICANCE: We provide empirical evidence that local and global methods of surface Laplacian estimation are equivalent to improve the spatial resolution of EEG traces. Global methods allow to explore the scalp topography and local methods allow to spare time in electrode setting that can be useful for studies on special populations (i.e. children, aged subjects) and for clinical purposes.


Subject(s)
Brain Mapping , Electroencephalography , Models, Neurological , Reaction Time/physiology , Artifacts , Electrodes , Electromyography , Electrooculography/methods , Functional Laterality/physiology , Humans , Probability , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted , Time Factors
4.
Clin Neurophysiol ; 114(12): 2376-84, 2003 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14652098

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The present study was aimed at testing whether foreperiod duration affects the activity recorded over the primary sensorimotor cortices during the reaction time. METHODS: The foreperiod duration (500 or 2500 ms) was varied across blocks of trials during a between-hand choice reaction time task; surface Laplacians were estimated from EEG recordings by the source derivation method. RESULTS: Reaction time was shorter for the 500 ms foreperiod than for the 2500 ms foreperiod. A contralateral negativity/ipsilateral positivity pattern showed up over the primary sensorimotor cortices. The time between the contralateral negativity onset and the electromyographic onset was shorter for the 500 ms foreperiod than for the 2500 ms foreperiod, which suggests that the foreperiod affects the implementation of the motor command. Furthermore, the interval between the onset of the voluntary electromyographic activity and the mechanical response was shorter for the 500 ms foreperiod than for the 2500 ms foreperiod. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that time preparation affects both central and peripheral motor processes.


Subject(s)
Evoked Potentials, Motor/physiology , Motor Cortex/physiology , Somatosensory Cortex/physiology , Adult , Electric Stimulation , Electromyography , Female , Functional Laterality/physiology , Humans , Magnetics , Male , Neural Inhibition/physiology , Reaction Time/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...