ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Nephrolithiasis is a frequent disease observed in 1 to 20 % of the general population. This disease predominates in male patients (2:1) and is characterized by a high rate of recurrences (about 50 %). CASE REPORT: We report the case of a 45-year old male patient who experienced during about ten years recurrent bilateral renal colic episodes due to brushite lithiasis. These stones were treated with multiple extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy sessions. A pyeloureteral junction syndrome predisposing to bulky stones formation has been put in evidence and required a pyeloplasty. After more than ten years of disease activity, a biochemical screening diagnosed primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). Radiological assessment identified a parathyroid gland adenoma. Successful surgical removal of this lesion was followed by resolution of the symptomatic kidney stones formation. DISCUSSION: PHPT is associated with kidney stones in about 20 % of the patients. Hypercalciuria is the main risk factor of stones formation but other predisposing factors are also probably involved. Patients carrying a polymorphism located in the coding sequence of the calcium-sensing receptor gene or in the regulatory region of this gene seem to experience an increased occurrence of urinary lithiasis. CONCLUSION: The present case stresses the importance of a metabolic assessment in all patients with recurrent nephrolithiasis, especially in case of bilateral episodes.
Subject(s)
Hyperparathyroidism, Primary/complications , Hyperparathyroidism, Primary/pathology , Nephrolithiasis/complications , Nephrolithiasis/pathology , Calcium Phosphates/metabolism , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Hyperparathyroidism, Primary/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Nephrolithiasis/diagnostic imaging , Nephrolithiasis/metabolism , Radiography , RecurrenceABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The detection of recurrent pituitary adenoma by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is rendered uncertain by the tissue remodelling that follows surgery or radiotherapy. We aimed to evaluate the contribution of PET with 11C-methionine (MET-PET) in the detection and management of recurrent pituitary adenoma. METHODS: Thirty-three patients with pituitary adenoma were evaluated postoperatively by MET-PET, either because of biological evidence of active residual tumour or because of MRI demonstration of non-functional adenoma growth. We studied 24 secreting adenomas and nine non-functional adenomas. RESULTS: In 30 patients, MET-PET detected abnormally hypermetabolic tissue. In 14 out of these, MRI did not differentiate between residual tumour and scar formation. In nine of these 14 cases, major therapeutic decisions were undertaken (radiosurgery and surgery). In another group of 16 patients, both MET-PET and MRI detected abnormal tissue. In one case, neither MRI nor MET-PET detected adenomatous tissue. Finally, abnormal tissue was detected in two patients on MRI solely. In these two cases, failure of MET-PET to reveal the adenoma was attributable to concomitant inhibitory therapy. The sensitivity of MET-PET and MRI varied as a function of the tumour type: all non-functional adenomas were localised by both modalities, while MET-PET detected all adrenocorticotropic hormone-secreting adenomas whereas MRI depicted only one of these eight lesions. Fifteen out of 17 patients treated by radiosurgery showed clinical improvement after treatment. CONCLUSION: We suggest that MET-PET is a sensitive technique complementary to MRI for the detection of residual or recurrent pituitary adenomas. It should gain a place in the efficient management of these tumours.
