ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Although general surgeons normally perform laparoscopic colectomies in patients with colon cancer, the procedure is also indicated for serosa-negative tumors (≤ cT3). Serosal invasion (T4a) is regarded as a potential risk factor for peritoneal dissemination due to pneumoperitoneum effects and tumor manipulation during laparoscopic colectomy. We compared short- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent laparoscopic and open colectomies for serosa-involving colon cancer (pT4a) and had a preoperative diagnosis of cancer without serosal invasion (≤cT3). METHODS: A total of 179 patients (102 patients treated with laparoscopic colectomies and 77 with open colectomies) who were treated between 2009 and 2015 were included. These patients were first diagnosed preoperatively with ≤ cT3 disease based on computed tomography, endoscopy, or endoscopic ultrasound, but they were diagnosed with pT4a disease based on final pathology results. Recurrence and survival rates between the two groups were compared. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics, clinical stage, type of colectomy, and short-term outcome did not differ between the groups. Five-year overall survival (OS) (p=0.248) and disease- free survival (DFS) rates (p=0.113) were comparable between the laparoscopic and open groups. Recurrence patterns did not differ between groups. Moreover, laparoscopic colectomy did not increase peritoneal recurrence compared to open colectomy. By multivariate analysis, surgical approach was not an independent prognostic factor for OS or DFS. CONCLUSION: Similar survival and recurrence patterns were observed in patients with serosa-involving colon cancer (pT4a) who were preoperatively diagnosed with serosa negative disease (≤cT3) and underwent either laparoscopic or open colectomies. Laparoscopic colectomy may be safely performed in patients with serosa-positive tumors.
