Performance of a Large Language Model in the Generation of Clinical Guidelines for Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Spine Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Large language models, such as chat generative pre-trained transformer (ChatGPT), have great potential for streamlining medical processes and assisting physicians in clinical decision-making. This study aimed to assess the potential of ChatGPT's 2 models (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4.0) to support clinical decision-making by comparing its responses for antibiotic prophylaxis in spine surgery to accepted clinical guidelines. METHODS: ChatGPT models were prompted with questions from the North American Spine Society (NASS) Evidence-based Clinical Guidelines for Multidisciplinary Spine Care for Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Spine Surgery (2013). Its responses were then compared and assessed for accuracy. RESULTS: Of the 16 NASS guideline questions concerning antibiotic prophylaxis, 10 responses (62.5%) were accurate in ChatGPT's GPT-3.5 model and 13 (81%) were accurate in GPT-4.0. Twenty-five percent of GPT-3.5 answers were deemed as overly confident while 62.5% of GPT-4.0 answers directly used the NASS guideline as evidence for its response. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT demonstrated an impressive ability to accurately answer clinical questions. GPT-3.5 model's performance was limited by its tendency to give overly confident responses and its inability to identify the most significant elements in its responses. GPT-4.0 model's responses had higher accuracy and cited the NASS guideline as direct evidence many times. While GPT-4.0 is still far from perfect, it has shown an exceptional ability to extract the most relevant research available compared to GPT-3.5. Thus, while ChatGPT has shown far-reaching potential, scrutiny should still be exercised regarding its clinical use at this time.

Can generative artificial intelligence pass the orthopaedic board examination?

Background: Resident training programs in the US use the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE) developed by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) to assess the current knowledge of their residents and to identify the residents at risk of failing the Amerian Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) examination. Optimal strategies for OITE preparation are constantly being explored. There may be a role for Large Language Models (LLMs) in orthopaedic resident education. ChatGPT, an LLM launched in late 2022 has demonstrated the ability to produce accurate, detailed answers, potentially enabling it to aid in medical education and clinical decision-making. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of ChatGPT on Orthopaedic In-Training Examinations using Self-Assessment Exams from the AAOS database and approved literature as a proxy for the Orthopaedic Board Examination. Methods: 301 SAE questions from the AAOS database and associated AAOS literature were input into ChatGPT's interface in a question and multiple-choice format and the answers were then analyzed to determine which answer choice was selected. A new chat was used for every question. All answers were recorded, categorized, and compared to the answer given by the OITE and SAE exams, noting whether the answer was right or wrong. Results: Of the 301 questions asked, ChatGPT was able to correctly answer 183 (60.8%) of them. The subjects with the highest percentage of correct questions were basic science (81%), oncology (72.7%, shoulder and elbow (71.9%), and sports (71.4%). The questions were further subdivided into 3 groups: those about management, diagnosis, or knowledge recall. There were 86 management questions and 47 were correct (54.7%), 45 diagnosis questions with 32 correct (71.7%), and 168 knowledge recall questions with 102 correct (60.7%). Conclusions: ChatGPT has the potential to provide orthopedic educators and trainees with accurate clinical conclusions for the majority of board-style questions, although its reasoning should be carefully analyzed for accuracy and clinical validity. As such, its usefulness in a clinical educational context is currently limited but rapidly evolving. Clinical relevance: ChatGPT can access a multitude of medical data and may help provide accurate answers to clinical questions.

Performance of ChatGPT on NASS Clinical Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Comparison Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Comparative analysis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT's) ability to predict appropriate clinical recommendations based on the most recent clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. BACKGROUND: Low back pain is a very common and often debilitating condition that affects many people globally. ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence model that may be able to generate recommendations for low back pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the North American Spine Society Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines as the gold standard, 82 clinical questions relating to low back pain were entered into ChatGPT (GPT-3.5) independently. For each question, we recorded ChatGPT's answer, then used a point-answer system-the point being the guideline recommendation and the answer being ChatGPT's response-and asked ChatGPT if the point was mentioned in the answer to assess for accuracy. This response accuracy was repeated with one caveat-a prior prompt is given in ChatGPT to answer as an experienced orthopedic surgeon-for each question by guideline category. A two-sample proportion z test was used to assess any differences between the preprompt and postprompt scenarios with alpha=0.05. RESULTS: ChatGPT's response was accurate 65% (72% postprompt, P =0.41) for guidelines with clinical recommendations, 46% (58% postprompt, P =0.11) for guidelines with insufficient or conflicting data, and 49% (16% postprompt, P =0.003*) for guidelines with no adequate study to address the clinical question. For guidelines with insufficient or conflicting data, 44% (25% postprompt, P =0.01*) of ChatGPT responses wrongly suggested that sufficient evidence existed. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT was able to produce a sufficient clinical guideline recommendation for low back pain, with overall improvements if initially prompted. However, it tended to wrongly suggest evidence and often failed to mention, especially postprompt, when there is not enough evidence to adequately give an accurate recommendation.

Association Between Age-stratified Cohorts and Perioperative Complications and 30-day and 90-day Readmission in Patients Undergoing Single-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. OBJECTIVE: To assess perioperative complication rates and readmission rates after ACDF in a patient population of advanced age. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Readmission rates after ACDF are important markers of surgical quality and, with recent shifts in reimbursement schedules, they are rapidly gaining weight in the determination of surgeon and hospital reimbursement. METHODS: Patients 18 years of age and older who underwent elective single-level ACDF were identified in the National Readmissions Database (NRD) and stratified into 4 cohorts: 18-39 ("young"), 40-64 ("middle"), 65-74 ("senior"), and 75+ ("elderly") years of age. For each cohort, the perioperative complications, frequency of those complications, and number of patients with at least 1 readmission within 30 and 90 days of discharge were analyzed. χ 2 tests were used to calculate likelihood of complications and readmissions. RESULTS: There were 1174 "elderly" patients in 2016, 1072 in 2017, and 1010 in 2018 who underwent ACDF. Their rate of any complication was 8.95%, 11.00%, and 13.47%, respectively ( P <0.0001), with dysphagia and acute posthemorrhagic anemia being the most common across all 3 years. They experienced complications at a greater frequency than their younger counterparts (15.80%, P <0.0001; 16.98%, P <0.0001; 21.68%, P <0.0001). They also required 30-day and 90-day readmission more frequently ( P <0.0001). CONCLUSION: It has been well-established that advanced patient age brings greater risk of perioperative complications in ACDF surgery. What remains unsettled is the characterization of this age-complication relationship within specific age cohorts and how these complications inform patient hospital course. Our study provides an updated analysis of age-specific complications and readmission rates in ACDF patients. Orthopedic surgeons may account for the rise in complication and readmission rates in this population with the corresponding reduction in length and stay and consider this relationship before discharging elderly ACDF patients.

Impact of tobacco usage on readmission and complication rates following shoulder replacement surgery: A study of 164,527 patients.

Background: Tobacco carcinogens have adverse effects on bone health and are associated with inferior outcomes following orthopedic procedures. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact tobacco use has on readmission and complication rates following shoulder arthroplasty. Methods: The 2016-2018 National Readmissions Database was queried to identify patients who underwent anatomical, reverse, and hemi-shoulder arthroplasty. ICD-10 codes Z72.0 × (tobacco use disorder) and F17.2 × (nicotine dependence) were used to define "tobacco-users." Demographic, 30-/90-day readmission, surgical complication, and medical complication data were collected. Inferential statistics were used to analyze complications for both the cohort as a whole and for each procedure separately (i.e. anatomical, reverse, and hemiarthroplasty). Results: 164,527 patients were identified (92% nontobacco users). Tobacco users necessitated replacement seven years sooner than nonusers (p < 0.01) and were more likely to be male (52% vs. 43%; p < 0.01). Univariate analysis showed that tobacco users had higher rates of readmission, revisions, shoulder complications, and medical complications overall. In the multivariate analysis for the entire cohort, readmission, revision, and complication rates did not differ based on tobacco usage; however, smokers who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty in particular were found to have higher 90-day readmission, dislocation, and prosthetic complication rates compared to nonsmokers. Conclusion: Comparatively, tobacco users required surgical correction earlier in life and had higher rates of readmission, revision, and complications in the short term following their shoulder replacement. However, when controlling for tobacco usage as an independent predictor of adverse outcomes, these aforementioned findings were lost for the cohort as a whole. Overall, these findings indicate that shoulder replacement in general is a viable treatment option regardless of patient tobacco usage at short-term follow-up, but this conclusion may vary depending on the replacement type used.

Thromboembolic prophylaxis in spine surgery: an analysis of ChatGPT recommendations.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Venous thromboembolism is a negative outcome of elective spine surgery. However, the use of thromboembolic chemoprophylaxis in this patient population is controversial due to the possible increased risk of epidural hematoma. ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence model which may be able to generate recommendations for thromboembolic prophylaxis in spine surgery. PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of ChatGPT recommendations for thromboembolic prophylaxis in spine surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Comparative analysis. PATIENT SAMPLE: None. OUTCOME MEASURES: Accuracy, over-conclusiveness, supplemental, and incompleteness of ChatGPT responses compared to the North American Spine Society (NASS) clinical guidelines. METHODS: ChatGPT was prompted with questions from the 2009 NASS clinical guidelines for antithrombotic therapies and evaluated for concordance with the clinical guidelines. ChatGPT-3.5 responses were obtained on March 5, 2023, and ChatGPT-4.0 responses were obtained on April 7, 2023. A ChatGPT response was classified as accurate if it did not contradict the clinical guideline. Three additional categories were created to further evaluate the ChatGPT responses in comparison to the NASS guidelines: over-conclusiveness, supplementary, and incompleteness. ChatGPT was classified as over-conclusive if it made a recommendation where the NASS guideline did not provide one. ChatGPT was classified as supplementary if it included additional relevant information not specified by the NASS guideline. ChatGPT was classified as incomplete if it failed to provide relevant information included in the NASS guideline. RESULTS: Twelve clinical guidelines were evaluated in total. Compared to the NASS clinical guidelines, ChatGPT-3.5 was accurate in 4 (33%) of its responses while ChatGPT-4.0 was accurate in 11 (92%) responses. ChatGPT-3.5 was over-conclusive in 6 (50%) of its responses while ChatGPT-4.0 was over-conclusive in 1 (8%) response. ChatGPT-3.5 provided supplemental information in 8 (67%) of its responses, and ChatGPT-4.0 provided supplemental information in 11 (92%) responses. Four (33%) responses from ChatGPT-3.5 were incomplete, and 4 (33%) responses from ChatGPT-4.0 were incomplete. CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT was able to provide recommendations for thromboembolic prophylaxis with reasonable accuracy. ChatGPT-3.5 tended to cite nonexistent sources and was more likely to give specific recommendations while ChatGPT-4.0 was more conservative in its answers. As ChatGPT is continuously updated, further validation is needed before it can be used as a guideline for clinical practice.

Diabetes increases risk for readmission and infection after shoulder arthroplasty: A national readmissions study of 113,713 patients.

Background: The recent increasing popularity of shoulder arthroplasty has been paralleled by a rise in prevalence of diabetes in the United States. We aimed to evaluate the impact of diabetes status on readmission and short-term complications among patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. Methods: We analyzed the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Readmissions Database (NRD) between the years 2016-2018. Patients were included in the study if they underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) according to ICD-10 procedure codes. Postoperative complications including surgical site/joint infection, dislocation, prosthetic complications, hardware-related complications, non-infectious wound complications, 30-day, and 90-day readmission were collected. Results: A total of 113,713 shoulder arthroplasty patients were included. 23,749 (20.9%) had a diagnosis of diabetes and 89,964 (79.1%) did not. On multivariate analysis, a diagnosis of diabetes led to an increased risk of 30-day (OR: 1.24; 95% CI: [1.14, 1.34]; p < 0.001) and 90-day (OR: 1.18; 95% CI: [1.12, 1.25]; p < 0.001) readmission, surgical site/joint infection (OR: 1.21; 95% CI: [1.06, 1.38]; p = 0.005), respiratory complication (OR: 1.34; 95% CI: [1.09, 1.64]; p = 0.005), postoperative infection (OR: 1.22; 95% CI [1.07, 1.39]; p = 0.003), and deep vein thrombosis (OR: 1.38; 95% CI: [1.09, 1.74]; p = 0.007). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that patients with diabetes may be at an increased risk of readmission, infection, respiratory complication, and deep vein thrombosis following shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder surgeons should consider these potential adverse events when planning postoperative care for patients with diabetes.

Robust prediction of nonhome discharge following elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using explainable machine learning.

PURPOSE: Predict nonhome discharge (NHD) following elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using an explainable machine learning model. METHODS: 2227 patients undergoing elective ACDF from 2008 to 2019 were identified from a single institutional database. A machine learning model was trained on preoperative variables, including demographics, comorbidity indices, and levels fused. The validation technique was repeated stratified K-Fold cross validation with the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) statistic as the performance metric. Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values were calculated to provide further explainability regarding the model's decision making. RESULTS: The preoperative model performed with an AUROC of 0.83 ± 0.05. SHAP scores revealed the most pertinent risk factors to be age, medicare insurance, and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score. Interaction analysis demonstrated that female patients over 65 with greater fusion levels were more likely to undergo NHD. Likewise, ASA demonstrated positive interaction effects with female sex, levels fused and BMI. CONCLUSION: We validated an explainable machine learning model for the prediction of NHD using common preoperative variables. Adding transparency is a key step towards clinical application because it demonstrates that our model's "thinking" aligns with clinical reasoning. Interactive analysis demonstrated that those of age over 65, female sex, higher ASA score, and greater fusion levels were more predisposed to NHD. Age and ASA score were similar in their predictive ability. Machine learning may be used to predict NHD, and can assist surgeons with patient counseling or early discharge planning.

Using Sentiment Analysis to Understand What Patients Are Saying About Hand Surgeons Online.

BACKGROUND: Physician review websites have influence on a patient's selection of a provider. Written reviews are subjective and difficult to quantitatively analyze. Sentiment analysis of writing can quantitatively assess surgeon reviews to provide actionable feedback for surgeons to improve practice. The objective of this study is to quantitatively analyze large subset of written reviews of hand surgeons using sentiment analysis and report unbiased trends in words used to describe the reviewed surgeons and biases associated with surgeon demographic factors. METHODS: Online written and star-rating reviews of hand surgeons were obtained from healthgrades.com and webmd.com. A sentiment analysis package was used to calculate compound scores of all reviews. Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to determine the relationship between demographic variables and average sentiment score of written reviews. Positive and negative word and word-pair frequency analysis was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 786 hand surgeons' reviews were analyzed. Analysis showed a significant relationship between the sentiment scores and overall average star-rated reviews (r2 = 0.604, P ≤ .01). There was no significant difference in review sentiment by provider sex; however, surgeons aged 50 years and younger had more positive reviews than older (P < .01). The most frequently used bigrams used to describe top-rated surgeons were associated with good bedside manner and efficient pain management, whereas those with the worst reviews are often characterized as rude and unable to relieve pain. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insight into both demographic and behavioral factors contributing to positive reviews and reinforces the importance of pain expectation management.

How Are Patients Reviewing Spine Surgeons Online? A Sentiment Analysis of Physician Review Website Written Comments.

STUDY DESIGN: A Sentiment Analysis of online reviews of spine surgeons. OBJECTIVES: Physician review websites have significant impact on a patient's provider selection. Written reviews are subjective, but sentiment analysis through machine learning can quantitatively analyze these reviews. This study analyzes online written reviews of spine surgeons and reports biases associated with demographic factors and trends in words utilized. METHODS: Online written and star-reviews of spine surgeons were obtained from healthgrades.com. A sentiment analysis package was used to analyze the written reviews. The relationship of demographic variables to these scores was analyzed with t-tests and word and bigram frequency analyses were performed. Additionally, a multiple regression analysis was performed on key terms. RESULTS: 8357 reviews of 480 surgeons were analyzed. There was a significant difference between the means of sentiment analysis scores and star scores for both gender and age. Younger, male surgeons were rated more highly on average (P < .01). Word frequency analysis indicated that behavioral factors and pain were the main contributing factors to both the best and worst reviewed surgeons. Additionally, several clinically relevant words, when included in a review, affected the odds of a positive review. CONCLUSIONS: The best reviews laud surgeons for their ability to manage pain and for exhibiting positive bedside manner. However, the worst reviews primarily focus on pain and its management, as exhibited by the frequency and multivariate analysis. Pain is a clear contributing factor to reviews, thus emphasizing the importance of establishing proper pain expectations prior to any intervention.

Readmission and Associated Factors in Surgical Versus Non-Surgical Management of Spinal Epidural Abscess: A Nationwide Readmissions Database Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: Spinal epidural abscess (SEA) is a rare but potentially life-threatening infection treated with antimicrobials and, in most cases, immediate surgical decompression. Previous studies comparing medical and surgical management of SEA are low powered and limited to a single institution. As such, the present study compares readmission in surgical and non-surgical management using a large national dataset. METHODS: We identified all hospital admissions for SEA using the Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD), which is the largest collection of hospital admissions data. Patients were grouped into surgically and non-surgically managed cohorts using ICD-10 coding and compared using information retrieved from the NRD such as demographics, comorbidities, length of stay and cost of admission. RESULTS: We identified 350 surgically managed and 350 non-surgically managed patients. The 90-day readmission rates for surgical and non-surgical management were 26.0% and 35.1%, respectively (P < .05). Expectedly, surgical management was associated with a significantly higher charge and length of stay at index hospital admission. Surgically managed patients had a significantly lower risk of readmission for osteomyelitis (P < .05). Finally, in patients with a low comorbidity burden, we observed a significantly lower 90-day readmission rate for surgically managed patients (surgical: 23.0%, non-surgical: 33.8%, P < .05). CONCLUSION: In patients with a low comorbidity burden, we observed a significantly lower readmission rate for surgically managed patients than non-surgically managed patients. The results of this study suggest a lower readmission rate as an advantage to surgical management of SEA and emphasize the importance of SEA as a not-to-miss diagnosis.

Sentiment Analysis of Online Patient-Written Reviews of Vascular Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Online patient reviews influence a patient's choice of a vascular surgeon. The aim of this study is to examine underlying factors that contribute to positive and negative patient reviews by leveraging sentiment analysis and machine learning methods. METHODS: The Society of Vascular Surgeons publicly accessible member directory was queried and cross-referenced with a popular patient-maintained physician review website, healthgrades.com. Sentiment analysis and machine learning methods were used to analyze several parameters. Demographics (gender, age, and state of practice), star rating (of 5 stars), and written reviews were obtained for corresponding vascular surgeons. A sentiment analysis model was applied to patient-written reviews and validated against the star ratings. Student's t-test or one-way analysis of variance assessed demographic relationships with reviews. Word frequency assessments and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify common and determinative components of written reviews. RESULTS: A total of 1,799 vascular surgeons had public profiles with reviews. Female gender of surgeon was associated with lower star ratings (male = 4.19, female = 3.95, P < 0.01) and average sentiment score (male = 0.50, female = 0.40, P < 0.01). Younger physician age was associated with higher star rating (P = 0.02) but not average sentiment score (P = 0.12). In the Best reviews, the most commonly used one-words were Care (N = 999), Caring (N = 767), and Kind (N = 479), while the most commonly used two-word pairs were Saved/Life (N = 189), Feel/Comfortable (N = 106), and Kind/Caring (N = 104). For the Worst reviews, the most commonly used one-words were Pain (N = 254) and Rude (N = 148), while the most commonly used two-word pairs were No/One (N = 27), Waste/Time (N = 25), and Severe/Pain (N = 18). In a multiple logistic regression, satisfactory reviews were associated with words such as Confident (odds ratio [OR] = 8.93), Pain-free (OR = 4.72), Listens (OR = 2.55), and Bedside Manner (OR = 1.70), while unsatisfactory reviews were associated with words such as Rude (OR = 0.01), Arrogant (OR = 0.09), Infection (OR = 0.20), and Wait (OR = 0.48). CONCLUSIONS: Female surgeons received significantly worse reviews and younger surgeons tended to receive better reviews. The positivity and negativity of reviews were largely related to words associated with the patient-doctor experience and pain. Vascular surgeons should focus on these 2 areas to improve patient experiences and their own reviews.

A national analysis of the effect alcohol use disorder has on short-term complications and readmissions following total shoulder arthroplasty.

Background: Alcohol use disorder has been associated with broad health consequences that may interfere with healing after total shoulder arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to explore the impact of alcohol use disorder on readmissions and complications following total shoulder arthroplasty. Methods: We used data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Readmissions Database (NRD) from 2016 to 2018. Patients were included based on International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) procedure codes for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Patients with an alcohol use disorder (AUD) were identified using the ICD-10 diagnosis code F10.20. Demographics, complications, and 30-day and 90-day readmission were collected for all patients. A univariate logistic regression was performed to investigate AUD as a factor affecting readmission and complication rates. A multivariate logistic regression model was created to assess the impact of alcohol use disorder on complications and readmission while controlling for demographic factors. Results: In total, 164,527 patients were included, and 503 (0.3%) patients had a prior diagnosis of AUD. Revision surgery was more common in patients with an alcohol use disorder (8.8% vs. 6.2%; p = 0.022). Postoperative infection (p = 0.026), dislocation (p = 0.025), liver complications (p < 0.01), and 90-day readmission (p < 0.01) were more common in patients with a diagnosed AUD. On multivariate analysis, patients with an AUD were found to be at increased odds for liver complications (OR: 46.8; 95% CI: [32.8, 66.8]; p < 0.01). Comparatively, mean age, length of stay, and over healthcare costs were also higher for patients with an AUD. Conclusion: Patients with a diagnosis of AUD were more likely to suffer from shoulder dislocation, liver complications, and 90-day readmission, while also being younger and having longer hospital stays. Therefore, surgeons should take caution to anticipate and prevent complications and readmissions following total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with an AUD.

Building better pediatric surgeons: A sentiment analysis of online physician review websites.

Purpose: Physician review websites are a heavily utilized patient tool for finding, rating, and reviewing surgeons. Natural language processing such as sentiment analysis provides a comprehensive approach to better understand the nuances of patient perception. This study utilizes sentiment analysis to examine how specific patient sentiments correspond to positive and negative experiences in online reviews of pediatric orthopedic surgeons. Methods: The online written reviews and star ratings of pediatric surgeons belonging to the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America were obtained from healthgrades.com. A sentiment analysis package obtained compound scores of each surgeon's reviews. Inferential statistics analyzed relationships between demographic variables and star/sentiment scores. Word frequency analyses and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed on key terms. Results: A total of 749 pediatric surgeons (3830 total online reviews) were included. 80.8% were males and 33.8% were below 50 years of age. Male surgeons and younger surgeons had higher mean star ratings. Surgeon attributes including "confident" (p < 0.01) and "comfortable" (p < 0.01) improved the odds of positive reviews, while "rude" (p < 0.01) and "unprofessional" (p < 0.01) decreased these odds. Comments regarding "pain" lowered the odds of positive reviews (p < 0.01), whereas "pain-free" increased these odds (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Pediatric surgeons who were younger, communicated effectively, eased pain, and curated a welcoming office setting were more likely to receive positively written online reviews. This suggests that a spectrum of interpersonal and ancillary factors impact patient experience and perceptions beyond surgical skill. These outcomes can advise pediatric surgeons on behavioral and office qualities that patients and families prioritize when rating/recommending surgeons online. Level of evidence: IV.

Trends in the Charges and Utilization of Computer-Assisted Navigation in Cervical and Thoracolumbar Spinal Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective national database study. PURPOSE: This study is conducted to assess the trends in the charges and usage of computer-assisted navigation in cervical and thoracolumbar spinal surgery. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: This study is the first of its kind to use a nationwide dataset to analyze trends of computer-assisted navigation in spinal surgery over a recent time period in terms of use in the field as well as the cost of the technology. METHODS: Relevant data from the National Readmission Database in 2015-2018 were analyzed, and the computer-assisted procedures of cervical and thoracolumbar spinal surgery were identified using International Classification of Diseases 9th and 10th revision codes. Patient demographics, surgical data, readmissions, and total charges were examined. Comorbidity burden was calculated using the Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity index. Complication rates were determined on the basis of diagnosis codes. RESULTS: A total of 48,116 cervical cases and 27,093 thoracolumbar cases were identified using computer-assisted navigation. No major differences in sex, age, or comorbidities over time were found. The utilization of computer-assisted navigation for cervical and thoracolumbar spinal fusion cases increased from 2015 to 2018 and normalized to their respective years' total cases (Pearson correlation coefficient=0.756, p =0.049; Pearson correlation coefficient=0.9895, p =0.010). Total charges for cervical and thoracolumbar cases increased over time (Pearson correlation coefficient=0.758, p =0.242; Pearson correlation coefficient=0.766, p =0.234). CONCLUSIONS: The use of computer-assisted navigation in spinal surgery increased significantly from 2015 to 2018. The average cost grossly increased from 2015 to 2018, and it was higher than the average cost of nonnavigated spinal surgery. With the increased utilization and standardization of computer-assisted navigation in spinal surgeries, the cost of care of more patients might potentially increase. As a result, further studies should be conducted to determine whether the use of computer-assisted navigation is efficient in terms of cost and improvement of care.

The Impact of Computer-Assisted Navigation on Charges and Readmission in Lumbar Spinal Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective National Database Study. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the cost and patient outcomes associated with the utilization of computer-assisted navigation (CAN) utilization on patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion. BACKGROUND: CAN systems have demonstrated comparable outcomes with instrumentation and procedural speed when compared with traditional techniques. In recent years, CAN systems have seen increased adoption in spinal surgery as they allow for better contextualization of anatomical structures with the goal of improving surgical accuracy and reproducibility. METHODS: The 2016 National Readmission Database was queried for patients with lumbar spinal fusion ICD-10 codes, with 2 subgroups created based on computer-aided navigation ICD-10 codes. Nonelective cases and patients below 18 years of age were excluded. Univariate analysis on demographics, surgical data, and total charges was performed. Postoperative complication rates were calculated based on diagnosis. Lastly, multivariate analysis was performed to assess navigation's impact on cost and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 88,445 lumbar fusion surgery patients were identified. Of the total, 2478 (2.8%) patients underwent lumbar fusion with navigation utilization, while 85,967 (97.2%) patients underwent surgery without navigation. The average total charges were $150,947 ($150,058, $151,836) and $161,018 ($155,747, $166,289) for the non-CAN and CAN groups, respectively ( P <0.001). The 30-day readmission rates were 5.3% for the non-CAN cohort and 3.1% for the CAN cohort ( P <0.05). The 90-day readmission rates were 8.8% for the non-CAN cohort and 5.2% for the CAN cohort ( P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CAN use was found to be significantly associated with increased cost and decreased 30-day and 90-day readmissions. Although patients operated on with CAN had increased routine discharge and decreased readmission risk, future studies must continue to evaluate the cost-benefit of CAN. Limitations include ICD-10 codes for CAN utilization being specific to region of surgery, not to exact type. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Understanding Artificial Intelligence and Predictive Analytics: A Clinically Focused Review of Machine Learning Techniques.

¼: Machine learning and artificial intelligence have seen tremendous growth in recent years and have been applied in numerous studies in the field of orthopaedics. ¼: Machine learning will soon become critical in the day-to-day operations of orthopaedic practice; therefore, it is imperative that providers become accustomed to and familiar with not only the terminology but also the fundamental techniques behind the technology. ¼: A foundation of knowledge regarding machine learning is critical for physicians so they can begin to understand the details in the algorithms that are being developed, which provide improved accuracy compared with clinicians, decreased time required, and a heightened ability to triage patients.

The Impact of Computer-Assisted Navigation on Charges and Readmission in Patients Undergoing Posterior Cervical Fusion Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of 2016 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD). OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate cost and outcomes associated with navigation use on posterior cervical fusion (PCF) surgery patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Computer-assisted navigation systems demonstrate comparable outcomes with hardware placement and procedural speed compared with traditional techniques. Innovations in technology continue to improve surgeons' performance in complicated procedures, causing need to analyze the impact on patient care. METHODS: The 2016 NRD was queried for patients with PCF surgery ICD-10 codes. Cost and readmission rates were compared with and without navigation. Nonelective cases and patients below 18 years of age were excluded. Univariate analysis on demographics, surgical data, and total charges was performed. Lastly, multivariate analysis was performed to assess navigation's impact on cost and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 11,834 patients were identified, with 137 (1.2%) patients undergoing surgery with navigation and 11,697 (98.8%) patients without. Average total charge was $131,939.47 and $141,270.1 for the non-navigation and navigation cohorts, respectively ( P =0.349). Thirty-day and 90-day readmission rates were not significantly lower in patients who received navigation versus those that did not ( P =0.087). This remained insignificant after adjusting for several variables, age above 65, sex, medicare status, mental health history, and comorbidities. The model adjusting for demographic and comorbidities maintained insignificant results of navigation being associated with decreased 30-day and 90-day readmissions ( P =0.079). CONCLUSIONS: Navigation use in PCF surgery was not associated with increased cost, and patients operated on with navigation did not significantly have increased routine discharge or decreased 90-day readmission. As a result, future studies must continue to evaluate the cost-benefit of navigation use for cervical fusion surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Scoliosis surgery in social media: a natural language processing approach to analyzing the online patient perspective.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to analyze posts shared on Instagram, Twitter, and Reddit referencing scoliosis surgery to evaluate content, tone, and perspective. METHODS: Public posts from Instagram, Twitter, and Reddit were parsed in 2020-2021 and selected based on inclusion of the words 'scoliosis surgery' or '#scoliosissurgery. 100 Reddit posts, 5022 Instagram posts, and 1414 tweets were included in analysis. The Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK) python library was utilized to perform computational text analysis to determine content and sentiment analysis to estimate the tone of posts across each platform. RESULTS: 46.4% of Tweets were positive in tone, 39.4% were negative, and 13.8% were neutral. Positive content focused on patients, friends, or hospitals sharing good outcomes after a patient's surgery. Negative content focused on long wait times to receive scoliosis surgery. 64.7% of Instagram posts were positive in tone, 16.3% were negative, and 19.0% were neutral. Positive content centered around post-operative progress reports and educational resources, while negative content focused on long-term back pain. 37% of Reddit posts were positive in tone, 38% were negative, and 25% were neutral. Positive posts were about personal post-operative progress reports, while negative posts were about fears prior to scoliosis surgery and questions about risks of the procedure. CONCLUSION: This study highlights scoliosis surgery content in social media formats and stratifies how this content is portrayed based on the platform it is on. Surgeons can use this knowledge to better educate and connect with their own patients, thus harnessing the power and reach of social media. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

What are patients saying about you online? A sentiment analysis of online written reviews on Scoliosis Research Society surgeons.

PURPOSE: Physician review websites have significant influence on a patient's selection of a provider, but written reviews are subjective. Sentiment analysis of writing through artificial intelligence can quantify surgeon reviews to provide actionable feedback. The objective of this study is to quantitatively analyze the written reviews of members of the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) through sentiment analysis. METHODS: Online written reviews and star-rating reviews of SRS surgeons were obtained from healthgrades.com, and a sentiment analysis package was used to obtain compound scores of each physician's reviews. A t test and ANOVA was performed to determine the relationship between demographic variables and average sentiment score of written reviews. Positive and negative word and word-pair frequency analysis was performed to provide context to words used to describe surgeons. RESULTS: Seven hundred and twenty-one SRS surgeon's reviews were analyzed. Analysis showed a positive correlation between the sentiment scores and overall average star-rated reviews (r2 = 0.5, p < 0.01). There was no difference in review sentiment by provider gender. However, the age of surgeons showed a significant difference as younger surgeons, on average, had more positive reviews (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The most frequently used word pairs used to describe top-rated surgeons describe compassionate providers and efficiency in pain management. Conversely, those with the worst reviews are characterized as unable to relieve pain. Through quantitative analysis of physician reviews, pain is a clear factor contributing to both positive and negative reviews of surgeons, reinforcing the need to properly manage pain expectations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.