Impact of NS5A sequences of Hepatitis C virus genotype 1a on early viral kinetics during treatment with peginterferon- alpha 2a plus ribavirin.

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 is the most prevalent genotype in Western countries, and treatment with pegylated interferon (pegIFN) plus ribavirin fails in 50%-60% of patients. Genetic variability within the NS5A dsRNA-dependent protein kinase binding domain (PKRbd) of HCV-1b has been associated with responsiveness to IFN- alpha . Little is known about NS5A sequences of HCV-1a. We investigated whether genetic variability of HCV-1a NS5A correlates with the early HCV kinetics during treatment. METHODS: Twenty-four treatment-naive, HCV-1a-infected patients were treated with standard doses of pegIFN- alpha 2a plus ribavirin. HCV viremia was quantitated at days 0, 1, 2, and 3 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 of treatment. According to HCV kinetics, patients were classified as early rapid responders, early moderate responders, or early slow responders. The full-length HCV NS5A was sequenced at baseline and at week 1. RESULTS: At baseline, variability of the NS5A C terminus (concentrated in the PKRbd) is associated with interferon efficacy but not with the second phase of the early viral decline that has been associated with a sustained virologic response. Comparisons between baseline and week-1 full-length sequences did not show significant increases in mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic variability of HCV-1a NS5A does not predict responsiveness to IFN- alpha . Differences in early kinetics during combination therapy are not due to selection of IFN-resistant HCV strains.

Relationship between early HCV kinetics and T-cell reactivity in chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 during peginterferon and ribavirin therapy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To gain understanding of inter-individual differences of treatment response in hepatitis C virus genotype 1 (HCV-G1) patients, we investigated simultaneously the early HCV kinetics and virus-specific T-cell reactivity. METHODS: Thirty, treatment-naïve HCV-G1 patients received peginterferon-alfa2a 180 microg/week plus ribavirin 1000-1200 mg/day, with blood samples collected prospectively at protocol time-points. HCV RNA was quantitated with a TaqMan assay with mathematical modelling of HCV decay. Virus-specific CD4+/CD8+ T-cells were enumerated by Elispot assays. RESULTS: HCV kinetic analysis identified two subgroups: fast (18/30) and slow (12/30) treatment-responders. Although these subgroups did not differ in any baseline characteristics, fast responders (FR) showed greater antiviral efficacy (epsilon) than slow responders (SR) (84.5+/-3.2 vs. 65.2+/-7.0%, P=0.002), and a higher rate of infected cell loss (delta) (0.56+/-0.2 vs. 0.04+/-0.02, P=0.038). The viral load drop (baseline to treatment week 4) was higher in FR vs. SR group (3.5+/-1.1 vs. 1.4+/-0.6 log10IU/mL, P<0.001). T-cell reactivity to HCV increased only in FR (after the loss of viraemia), but not in SR patients. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of early viral and T-cell kinetics during treatment reveals marked differences amongst HCV-G1 patients and may provide a basis for treatment individualization. Enhancement of antiviral T-cell reactivity requires rapid viraemia clearance, rather than immunostimulation alone.

Primary biliary cirrhosis and idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: a rare association.

Primary biliary cirrhosis has rarely been reported to be associated with idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis. We describe the case of a 57-year-old man who was confirmed to have both conditions, reflecting the likely autoimmune aetiopathogenesis common to both disorders.