Comparisons of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted, video-assisted, and open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment: a retrospective study.

Background: Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE), video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (VAMIE), and open esophagectomy (OE) all have significant roles in the management of esophageal cancer (EC). Few studies have compared efficacy and safety between RAE, VAMIE, and OE for resectable EC after neoadjuvant treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the short-term outcomes between RAE, VAMIE, and OE for resectable EC after neoadjuvant treatment. Methods: Ninety-eight patients were consecutively enrolled who underwent esophagectomy. A retrospective study was performed including 98 consecutive patients treated from January 2021 to August 2022 who received neoadjuvant treatment (including immunochemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy) followed by RAE, VAMIE or OE. Evaluated endpoints in the present study consisted of pathological outcomes, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, as well as postoperative complications. Results: No significant differences were seen in the operating time, blood loss, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, R0 resection, and number of dissected lymph nodes between the three RAE, VAMIE, or OE groups. The achievement rate of right recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) lymph node removal (P=0.01) and the total cost (P<0.001) were higher in RAE. The postoperative hospital stay of OE was longer than the other two groups (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications. Conclusions: Compared to VAMIE, no clear benefit exists for RAE in the treatment of resectable EC after neoadjuvant therapy. OE resulted in a longer hospital stay. Although the rate of successful right RLN node removal was higher with RAE, the clinical relevance for this is yet unclear.

Efficacy of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and survival surrogate analysis of neoadjuvant treatment in IB-IIIB lung squamous cell carcinoma.

Until now, there are still few comparisons between neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with stage IB-IIIB lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC). In addition, the ability of pathologic response to predict long-term survival has still not been established. In this retrospective, controlled clinical trial, we ultimately enrolled 231 patients with stage IB to IIIB LUSC who received 2-4 cycles perioperative immunochemotherapy or chemotherapy alone, followed by resection. The primary endpoint of this study was pathological response. Secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), surgical resection rate and adverse events (AEs). The rates of major pathologic response (MPR) and pathologic complete response (pCR) in the immunochemotherapy group were 66.7% and 41.9%, respectively, which were both higher than that in the other group (MPR: 25.0%, pCR: 20.8%) (P < 0.001). The median DFS in the chemotherapy group was 33.1 months (95% CI 8.4 to 57.8) and not reached in the immunochemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] for disease progression, disease recurrence, or death, 0.543; 95% CI 0.303 to 0.974; P = 0.038). The median OS of the immunochemotherapy group was not achieved (HR for death, 0.747; 95% CI 0.373 to 1.495; P = 0.41), with the chemotherapy group 64.8 months (95% CI not reached to not reached). The objective response rate (ORR) of immunochemotherapy regimen was higher than that of the chemotherapy regimen (immunochemotherapy: 74.5%, chemotherapy: 42.3%, P < 0.001). About 60.8% in the immunochemotherapy group and 61.5% in the chemotherapy group eventually underwent surgery. The incidence of grade3 and 4 adverse events was 18.3% in the immunochemotherapy group and 2.6% in the chemotherapy group. MPR was significantly associated with DFS and OS (HR, 0.325; 95% CI 0.127 to 0.833; P = 0.019; and HR, 0. 906; 95% CI 0.092 to 1.008; P = 0.051, respectively). The C-index of MPR (0.730 for DFS, 0.722 for OS) was higher than the C-index of cPR (0.672 for DFS, 0.659 for OS) and clinical response (0.426 for DFS, 0.542 for OS). Therapeutic regimen (P < 0.001; OR = 7.406; 95% CI 3.054 to 17.960) was significantly correlated with MPR. In patients with stage IB to IIIB LUSC, neoadjuvant treatment with immunochemotherapy can produce a higher percentage of patients with a MPR and longer survival than chemotherapy alone. MPR may serve as a surrogate endpoint of survival to evaluate neoadjuvant therapy.

Prognostic implication of UBE2C + CD8 + T cell in neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade plus chemotherapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) plus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with esophageal cancer (EC) has gained substantial attention. This study aimed to investigate the early and mid-term outcome of neoadjuvant ICBs plus chemotherapy and discover immune-associated predictors of major pathological response (MPR) for locally advanced EC. METHOD: Patients with locally advanced EC who received neoadjuvant ICBs plus chemotherapy were retrospectively included between June 2019 to December 2021. Conjoint analysis of Bulk-RNA seq (GSE165252) and scRNA seq (GSE188900) were used to investigate potential prognostic factors and immunological mechanisms, then multiplexed immunofluorescence was applied to validate. RESULTS: 76 patients were included. A total of 21 (27.6 %) patients achieved MPR, with 13 (17.1 %) attaining a pathological complete response. Over a median follow-up of 1.8 years, 6 (7.9 %) patients died and 21 (27.6 %) experienced disease recurrence within 0.6 to 2.1 years after surgery. The overall survival rate and recurrence-free survival rate were 93.3 + 2.9 % and 84.8 + 4.2 % at 12 months, 90.8 + 3.7 % and 67.1 + 6.4 % at 24 months, and 90.8 + 3.7 % and 62.9 + 7.2 % at 36 months, respectively. Patients achieving MPR had a significantly lower risk of recurrence compared to non-responders (9.5 % vs 34.5 %, P = 0.017). Analysis of bulk-RNA seq and scRNA-seq revealed that UBE2C and UBE2C + CD8 + T cells were adverse prognostic factors. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated that the non-MPR group had a higher infiltration of UBE2C + immune cells than MPR group after neoadjuvant treatment. Multiplexed immunofluorescence confirmed that infiltrating UBE2C + CD8 + T cells in MPR group were significantly fewer than non-MPR group after neoadjuvant treatment, indicating their poor prognostic role for EC. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant ICBs plus chemotherapy shows promising efficacy in locally advanced EC, with MPR being a significant predictor of lower recurrence risk. Immunological analyses identified UBE2C + CD8 + T cells as adverse prognostic factors, suggesting their potential as biomarkers for patient stratification and treatment response.

The efficacy and safety of percutaneous CT-guided iodine-125 brachytherapy combined with standard chemotherapy and brachytherapy alone for lung malignant nodule: a retrospective comparative cohort study.

Background: Lung metastasis nodules and advanced-stage tumors are often considered inoperable conditions for thoracic surgery and remain major challenges to clinical decision-making. Brachytherapy has its advantages in treating localized solid tumors, which can be used in combination with other treatments to achieve good safety and efficacy. In this study, we aimed to determine the outcomes of patients who received a combination of standard chemotherapy and computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous brachytherapy treatment for advanced-stage lung malignant lesions. Methods: We retrospectively collected data on patients with advanced lung cancer or lung metastasis nodules who underwent percutaneous CT-guided iodine-125 (125I) brachytherapy treatment. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A (brachytherapy with chemotherapy) and Group B (brachytherapy-only). Patients were reevaluated 1 month after the operation and then followed up every 3 months. The primary endpoint of this study was overall survival. Results: Our results showed that the mean age in Group B was higher (62.32±8.79 years) than that of Group A (68.59±11.46 years; P=0.018). Patients receiving a combination of chemotherapy and brachytherapy had a median survival time of 20.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 16.5-24.5], while those receiving brachytherapy alone had a median survival time of 16.4 months (95% CI, 11.7-21.1) (P=0.026). Patients who received additional thermal ablation treatment and those who did not have median survival times of 16.4 (95% CI, 10.2-22.7) and 17.0 months (95% CI, 13.3-20.8) (P=0.607). The median survival time for patients with oligo lesions was 19.8 months (95% CI, 15.7-23.9), while it was 10.5 months (95% CI, 7.5-13.4) for those who had multiple lesions. Conclusions: The combination of percutaneous CT-guided 125I brachytherapy and standard chemotherapy was superior to brachytherapy alone in terms of overall survival for patients with inoperable pulmonary lesions. Our results showed no benefit from additional adjuvant thermal ablation treatment. Patients with a single oligo nodule seem to have a better prognosis than those with multiple lesions.

Upregulation of CoQ shifts ferroptosis dependence from GPX4 to FSP1 in acquired radioresistance.

Acquired radioresistance is the primary contributor to treatment failure of radiotherapy, with ferroptosis is identified as a significant mechanism underlying cell death during radiotherapy. Although resistance to ferroptosis has been observed in both clinical samples of radioresistant cells and cell models, its mechanism remains unidentified. Herein, our investigation revealed that radioresistant cells exhibited greater tolerance to Glutathione Peroxidase 4 (GPX4) inhibitors and, conversely, increased sensitivity to ferroptosis suppressor protein 1 (FSP1) inhibitors compared to their sensitive counterparts. This observation suggested that FSP1 might play a dominant role in the development of radioresistance. Notably, the knockout of FSP1 demonstrated considerably superior efficacy in resensitizing cells to radiotherapy compared to the knockout of GPX4. To elucidate the driving force behind this functional shift, we conducted a metabolomic assay, which revealed an upregulation of Coenzyme Q (CoQ) synthesis and a downregulation of glutathione synthesis in the acquired radioresistance cells. Mechanistically, CoQ synthesis was found to be supported by aarF domain containing kinase 3-mediated phosphorylation of CoQ synthases, while the downregulation of Solute carrier family 7 member 11 led to decreased glutathione synthesis. Remarkably, our retrospective analysis of clinical response data further validated that the additional administration of statin during radiotherapy, which could impede CoQ production, effectively resensitized radioresistant cells to radiation. In summary, our findings demonstrate a dependency shift from GPX4 to FSP1 driven by altered metabolite synthesis during the acquisition of radioresistance. Moreover, we provide a promising therapeutic strategy for reversing radioresistance by inhibiting the FSP1-CoQ pathway.

Clinical evaluation of the impact of mediastinal tumour size on the subxiphoid approach video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.

OBJECTIVES: The application of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for relatively large mediastinal tumours (≥5.0 cm) has been a subject of debate, and few studies have investigated the subxiphoid approach VATS in different tumour size categories. The study aims to compare the efficacy of the subxiphoid approach VATS for achieving curative outcomes based on tumour size categories (<3.0, 3.0-4.9 and 5.0-10.0 cm). METHODS: A total of 165 patients with anterior mediastinal tumours who underwent surgery at our hospital between January 2018 and July 2022 were consecutively enrolled, categorized according to tumour size-group A (<3.0 cm): 58, group B (3.0-4.9 cm): 70 and group C (5.0-10.0 cm): 37. Clinical baseline data, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, and postoperative complications were analysed. RESULTS: The study revealed significant differences in operation time among the 3 groups (group A: 103.4 ± 36.1, group B: 106.4 ± 35.2, group C: 127.4 ± 44.8; P < 0.05) as well as in the volume of drainage (group A: 273.3 ± 162.0, group B: 411.9 ± 342.6, group C: 509.7 ± 543.7; P < 0.05). However, no differences were seen in blood loss, drainage duration, postoperative hospital stay and duration of postoperative oral analgesics. Additionally, the incidence of postoperative complications did not exhibit significant differences across these groups. CONCLUSIONS: Subxiphoid approach VATS is considered a feasible and safe surgical method for large-sized anterior mediastinal tumours (5.0-10.0 cm) with no invasion to the surrounding tissues and organs.