Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Pharm Pract ; 28(6): 499-503, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25112303

ABSTRACT

Patient understanding of acetaminophen is important for its safe and appropriate self-use. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in the San Francisco Bay Area to determine the impact of educational level, patient health literacy score, and other demographic characteristics on acetaminophen knowledge. A 17-item, in-person, paper-and-pen questionnaire containing questions about demographics and acetaminophen knowledge was administered to 311 adults outside 5 local grocery stores in varying socioeconomic communities. Knowledge assessed was whether Tylenol-McNeil contains acetaminophen, maximum daily dose, and primary organ affected by toxicity. Participant health literacy was evaluated using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine-Short Form (REALM-SF) test. Of the 300 who successfully completed the study, only 3.8% of all subjects were able to answer all 3 acetaminophen knowledge questions correctly regardless of educational level or health literacy score. This reaffirms that a lack of appropriate acetaminophen knowledge remains present in the general population, and further efforts to educate patients will be needed to prevent adverse events.


Subject(s)
Acetaminophen , Educational Status , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Literacy , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Residence Characteristics , Young Adult
2.
J Pharm Pract ; 28(1): 112-8, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24674909

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the factors impacting postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) residents' self-perceived readiness for residency. METHODS: A total of 1801 residents who matched in American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP)-accredited PGY1 programs were e-mailed individualized invitations to take an online survey. The survey collected self-ratings of readiness for residency training competencies including time management and organization, foundational knowledge, clinical practice, project management, and communication. KEY FINDINGS: Data from 556 completed surveys were analyzed. Residents agreed they were ready to perform activities requiring time management and organization (median = 4, mean = 4.08), foundational knowledge (median = 4, mean = 3.83), clinical practice (median = 4, mean = 3.67), and communication (median = 4, mean = 4.05). Residents who completed at least 1 academic advance pharmacy practice experience (APPE), 5 clinical APPEs, or held a bachelors degree felt more confident than their counterparts in regard to project management (P < .001, <.001, and .01, respectively). CONCLUSION: PGY1 residents generally felt prepared for time management and organization, foundational knowledge, and communication residency training competencies. This was significant for those who completed 1 or more academic APPEs, 5 or more clinical rotations, or a bachelors degree. Study results may assist pharmacy schools in preparing students for residency training, prospective resident applicants in becoming more competitive candidates for residency programs, and residency program directors in resident selection.


Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Education, Pharmacy, Graduate/statistics & numerical data , Knowledge , Pharmacy Residencies/statistics & numerical data , Self Efficacy , Adult , Communication , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors
3.
Am J Pharm Educ ; 78(10): 180, 2014 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25657367

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify differences among faculty members in various health professional training programs in perceived benefits and challenges of implementing interprofessional education (IPE). METHODS: A 19-item survey using a 5-point Likert scale was administered to faculty members across different health disciplines at a west coast, multicollege university with osteopathic medicine, pharmacy, and physician assistant programs. RESULTS: Sixty-two of 103 surveys (60.2%) were included in the study. Faculty members generally agreed that there were benefits of IPE on patient outcomes and that implementing IPE was feasible. However, group differences existed in belief that IPE improves care efficiency (p=0.001) and promotes team-based learning (p=0.001). Program divergence was also seen in frequency of stressing importance of IPE (p=0.009), preference for more IPE opportunities (p=0.041), and support (p=0.002) within respective college for IPE. CONCLUSIONS: Despite consensus among faculty members from 3 disciplines that IPE is invaluable to their curricula and training of health care students, important program level differences existed that would likely need to be addressed in advance IPE initiatives.


Subject(s)
Education, Pharmacy/organization & administration , Faculty/statistics & numerical data , Osteopathic Medicine/education , Physician Assistants/education , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , Curriculum , Data Collection , Female , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Male , Middle Aged , Universities
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...