Schools' mental health responses after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

OBJECTIVE: After the displacement of students following Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, schools in several states enrolled many students with potential mental health needs. This study sought to understand how schools perceived the mental health needs of these students and what mental health programs they implemented. METHODS: Mental health personnel at 19 public schools or school systems and 11 private or parochial schools in Louisiana, Alabama, Texas, and Mississippi were interviewed at two time points (spring and fall-winter of 2006). RESULTS: Schools undertook diverse approaches to interventions, depending on the preexisting mental health infrastructure and personnel, the perceived needs of students, and the barriers or facilitators in each system. Interviewees described a rapid and comprehensive approach to the crisis in the immediate aftermath. Shortly afterward, some schools perceived little need for mental health services and refocused on their academic missions. Other school systems perceived student need but were unable to implement trauma-focused programs because staff were not prepared to deliver such services and funding was lacking. However, some systems and schools were able to implement new programs or extend programs to displaced students. Implementation challenges included difficulty communicating with parents, burnout among staff and program implementers, and efforts to balance the needs of the displaced students with those of the preexisting student population. CONCLUSIONS: Despite significant efforts to support students affected by the hurricanes, schools were limited in their ability to implement disaster-focused programs. Extension of crisis plans to include precrisis training in mental health programming for students and staff who have ongoing difficulties after a disaster or crisis may be beneficial.

Outpatient mental health utilization among commercially insured individuals: in- and out-of-network care.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the rates and correlates of out-of-network outpatient mental health specialty care. RESEARCH DESIGN: Using administrative data from a large insurer, we examine the frequency of out-of-network utilization, analyze demographic and clinical characteristics of individuals receiving out-of-network care, and examine the types of service provided out-of-network. RESULTS: Out-of-network outpatient mental health care was received by 15.4% of adults who used outpatient mental health services, with 11.8% of adult outpatient mental health users receiving only out-of-network care and 3.6% receiving both in-network and out-of-network care. Out-of-network users received significantly more outpatient mental health care than individuals receiving only in-network mental health care. Rates of out-of-network psychotherapy services were substantially greater than for other commonly provided mental health services. CONCLUSION: A significant number of patients covered under this insurer received their outpatient mental health care out-of-network. This is most pronounced for individuals receiving psychotherapy. Further information is needed to improve our understanding of who seeks care from out-of-network providers and why as well as the effect of such care on clinical outcomes.

Terrorism's psychologic effects and their implications for primary care policy, research, and education.

This paper examines primary care physicians' (PCP) roles in helping the nation prepare for, respond to, and recover from the psychologic consequences of chemical, biologic, radiologic, or nuclear (CBRN) terrorism. First, we discuss the psychologic consequences of a CBRN attack and PCPs' roles in responding to these consequences. Second, we analyze these roles in light of the known barriers to delivering high-quality, primary care-based, mental health care. Third, we offer recommendations for mitigating these barriers and preparing PCPs to respond to the psychosocial consequences of a CBRN weapon. Importantly, our recommendations provide dual-use benefits to PCPs faced with the daily concerns of primary care mental health, including improved linkages and electronic connectivity with mental health, information technology, and decision support for providers, and needed education and research.

In their own words: lessons learned from those exposed to anthrax.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated perceptions of workers at the US Postal Service Brentwood Processing and Distribution Center and US Senate employees regarding public health responses to the anthrax mailings of October 2001. We generated recommendations for improving responses to bioterrorism on the basis of the perceptions we recorded. METHODS: Transcripts from focus groups conducted with Brentwood and US Senate employees were examined, and qualitative analysis identified common domains. RESULTS: Brentwood focus groups consisted of 36 participants (97% African American and 19% hearing impaired). US Senate focus groups consisted of 7 participants (71% White and 0% hearing impaired). The focus groups revealed that participants' trust in public health agencies had eroded and that this erosion could threaten the effectiveness of communication during future public health emergencies. Among Brentwood participants, lack of trust involved the perception that unfair treatment on the basis of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status had occurred; among US Senate participants, it derived from perceptions of inconsistent and disorganized messages. CONCLUSIONS: Effective communication during a public health emergency depends on the provision of clear messages and close involvement of the affected community. Diverse populations may require individualized approaches to ensure that messages are delivered appropriately. Special attention should be given to those who face barriers to traditional modes of communication.

A bitter pill to swallow: nonadherence with prophylactic antibiotics during the anthrax attacks and the role of private physicians.

To generate recommendations for improving adherence to public health advice during public health crises, we conducted semi-structured interviews with employees at the Brentwood Road Postal Facility and on Capitol Hill to identify key themes associated with decisions to adhere to recommended antibiotic prophylaxis during the 2001 anthrax attacks. Factors used in deciding to adhere to recommended prophylactic antibiotics and concerns about the official response were similar in Brentwood and Capitol Hill employees, and in adherent and nonadherent participants. All participants used multiple sources of information and support as they weighed the risk from anthrax against the advantages and disadvantages of antibiotics. We found that nonadherent participants were commonly following the advice of private physicians, whereas adherent participants commonly described ongoing support from multiple sources when discussing their decisions. Our findings highlight the need for better integration between the public and private health care systems during public health crises and the importance of equipping private physicians for their key role in aiding decision-making during a public health crisis. Special attention also should be given to enhancing support and information from multiple sources throughout the entire period of risk.

Emotional and behavioral consequences of bioterrorism: planning a public health response.

Millions of dollars have been spent improving the public health system's bioterrorism response capabilities. Yet relatively little attention has been paid to precisely how the public will respond to bioterrorism and how emotional and behavioral responses might complicate an otherwise successful response. This article synthesizes the available evidence about the likely emotional and behavioral consequences of bioterrorism to suggest what decision makers can do now to improve that response. It examines the emotional and behavioral impact of previous "bioterrorism-like" events and summarizes interviews with experts who have responded to such events or conducted research on the effects of community-wide disasters. The article concludes by reflecting on the evidence and experts' perspectives to suggest actions to be taken now and future policy and research priorities.

Using the chronic care model to improve treatment of alcohol use disorders in primary care settings.

OBJECTIVE: Alcohol use disorders (AUDs) are serious and often chronic medical conditions that present a significant public health concern. The Chronic Care Model (CCM), originally designed to improve care for patients with chronic conditions, is also applicable to a broad range of individuals with AUDs. In this article, we describe the CCM and discuss ways it can be adapted in primary care settings to improve care for AUDs. METHOD: We review the evidence for considering the spectrum of AUDs as a chronic disease and discuss how the CCM might guide the reorganization of care to improve the delivery of effective interventions in primary care settings. We also solicited specific advice and feedback from an expert panel by means of a listserv. RESULTS: The CCM is a heuristic model that offers an approach to increase the ability of PCPs to identify, treat and effectively manage AUDs. Research suggests the model works well for a variety of chronic illnesses and across a number of different organizational settings. Implementation of the model in the case of AUDs has the potential to improve their care. CONCLUSIONS: Given the potentially chronic and relapsing nature of AUDs, it is important for the alcohol treatment community to be aware of the current research on improving care for chronic illnesses and to consider how the CCM might be adapted to improve care for AUDs. Further work is needed on developing tools, self-management support resources and training strategies before the CCM can be evaluated in real world settings.

Comparison of adult and geriatric psychiatric practice patterns: findings from the American Psychiatric Association's Practice Research Network.

OBJECTIVE: The authors explored diagnostic and treatment patterns for patients under and over age 65 seen by a nationally representative sample of psychiatrists participating in the American Psychiatric Association's Practice Research Network. METHODS: Detailed patient information, including demographic and financial characteristics, diagnoses, service utilization, and treatment, was collected by 383 psychiatrists on 1,026 patients to assess the impact of patient age on pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy service use as well as treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Approximately 15% of the patient sample was over age 65. Compared with patients ages 19-64, a lower percentage of geriatric patients had Axis I comorbidity, but a higher percentage had Axis III comorbidity. Geriatric patients were more often treated in hospital settings, and older patients were less likely to have their visits adversely affected by financial pressures of the healthcare system. Over 60% of patients in both age-groups received antidepressants, but there was a disproportionately increased use of antipsychotics and antianxiety/benzodiazepine medications among geriatric patients. Being age 65+ was a strong predictor for "improved" clinician rating on general assessment scores, but failed to be a predictor of receiving psychotherapy or pharmacotherapy. CONCLUSION: There were important differences between subject groups. Overall, American psychiatrists treat a complex group of geriatric patients suffering from major mental disorders complicated by medical comorbidity. Additional studies would further enhance our understanding of the delivery of mental health services to elderly patients and improve training of psychiatrists who help care for our aging population.