Relugolix for oral treatment of uterine leiomyomas: a dose-finding, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Uterine leiomyomas are the most common neoplasm affecting women and frequently cause heavy menstrual bleeding and pain. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonists provide fast symptom relief and show promise as a medical (non-surgical) treatment option and as a presurgical treatment to reduce leiomyoma size. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of three dose levels of oral relugolix, a small molecule GnRH receptor antagonist, in Japanese women with uterine leiomyomas and heavy menstrual bleeding. METHODS: This phase 2, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study was conducted at 36 sites in Japan in women with uterine leiomyomas and heavy menstrual bleeding, defined as a pictorial blood loss assessment chart (PBAC) score of ≥ 120 in one menstrual cycle. Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to relugolix 10, 20, or 40 mg, or placebo, orally once daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a total PBAC score of < 10 from week 6 to 12. A sample size of 50 patients per group was estimated to provide ≥ 95% power, based on the comparison of relugolix 40 mg with placebo using a chi-square test with a significance level of 5% (two-sided). RESULTS: From November 2011 to September 2012, 216 patients were randomized and 214 patients (99.1%) were analyzed. The proportion (difference vs. placebo) of patients that achieved the primary endpoint in the placebo and 10-, 20-, and 40-mg relugolix groups were 0%, 20.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.3-32.3, P < .001), 42.6% (95% CI: 29.4-55.8, P < .001), and 83.3% (95% CI: 73.4-93.3, P < .001), respectively. Though treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between the 20- and 40-mg groups, the incidence rates were more frequent compared with the placebo group. Most of these adverse events were mild or moderate in intensity. CONCLUSIONS: Relugolix decreased menstrual blood loss in women with uterine leiomyomas in a dose-response manner, and was generally well tolerated. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01452659 , NCT01452659 (registered 17/10/2011); JAPIC Clinical Trial Information, https://www.clinicaltrials.jp , JapicCTI-111590 (registered 31/08/2011).

Relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonist, in women with endometriosis-associated pain: phase 2 safety and efficacy 24-week results.

BACKGROUND: Relugolix is a once-daily, oral, nonpeptide, gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety of relugolix over 24 weeks in women with endometriosis-associated pain. METHODS: This phase 2, randomized, open-label, parallel-group extension study was conducted in 101 clinics in Japan. Patients (premenopausal females ≥ 20 years) who completed the preceding 12-week relugolix phase 2 study continued to receive relugolix (10 mg, 20 mg, or 40 mg), placebo, or leuprorelin (3.75 mg) for an additional 12 weeks. Relugolix was administered orally once daily, and leuprorelin subcutaneously once every 4 weeks. The primary outcome was safety, including bone mineral density (BMD) and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Secondary endpoints included visual analog scale (VAS) scores for endometriosis-associated pain. Analysis sets were defined as all patients who were administered the study drug. RESULTS: Of 487 randomized patients in the preceding study, 397 enrolled in this extension study and continued to receive placebo (n = 77), relugolix 10 mg (n = 84), relugolix 20 mg (n = 78), relugolix 40 mg (n = 89), or leuprorelin (n = 69). Baseline characteristics were similar between extension study patients and patients in the preceding study. Frequency of TEAEs including metrorrhagia, menorrhagia, and hot flush was similar in the relugolix 40-mg and leuprorelin groups. Mean (SD) change in BMD from baseline at Week 24 was - 0.2 (1.99)% for placebo; - 1.6 (2.34)%, - 2.6 (2.94)%, and - 4.9 (2.91)% for the relugolix 10-mg, 20-mg, and 40-mg groups, respectively; and - 4.4 (2.16)% for leuprorelin. Mean ± SD change from baseline in mean VAS score (mm) for pelvic pain at end of treatment was - 3.2 ± 12.16 for placebo; - 6.8 ± 10.56, - 9.0 ± 11.84, and - 11.9 ± 11.26 for the relugolix 10-mg, 20-mg, and 40-mg groups, respectively; and - 12.7 ± 12.57 for leuprorelin. Estradiol levels decreased with increasing relugolix dose and remained below postmenopausal levels throughout the 24-week relugolix 40-mg treatment period. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with relugolix for 24 weeks was generally well tolerated and demonstrated similar pain reduction to leuprorelin in women with endometriosis. The dose-dependent loss in BMD observed with relugolix treatment was expected due to an induced hypoestrogenic state. Relugolix demonstrated a similar benefit/risk profile to injectable therapy in this phase 2 study. Trial registration NCT01452685 (ClinicalTrials.gov, registered 17/10/2011).

Relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist, reduces endometriosis-associated pain in a dose-response manner: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of three dose levels of relugolix, a gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist, compared with placebo and leuprorelin in women with endometriosis-associated pain. DESIGN: Phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: Hospitals and clinics. PATIENT(S): Adult premenopausal women with endometriosis who had dysmenorrhea and endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. INTERVENTION(S): During a 12-week treatment period, patients received relugolix 10 mg (n = 103), 20 mg (n = 100), or 40 mg (n = 103) as a daily oral dose; placebo (n = 97) as a daily oral dose; or leuprorelin 3.75 mg (n = 80) as a monthly subcutaneous injection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary endpoint was the change from baseline in mean visual analog scale score for pelvic pain during 28 days before the end of treatment. RESULT(S): The mean changes in mean visual analog scale score for pelvic pain were -3.8 mm in the placebo group; -6.2, -8.1, and -10.4 mm in the relugolix 10-mg, 20-mg, and 40-mg groups; respectively; and -10.6 mm in the leuprorelin group. The major adverse events with relugolix were hot flush, metrorrhagia, menorrhagia, and irregular menstruation, and bone mineral density decrease in a dose-response manner, which were also observed in the leuprorelin group with a frequency comparable with that in the relugolix 40-mg group. CONCLUSION(S): Oral administration of relugolix alleviated endometriosis-associated pain in a dose-response manner and was generally well tolerated. Relugolix 40 mg demonstrated efficacy and safety comparable with those of leuprorelin. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01458301.

Oral Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Antagonist Relugolix Compared With Leuprorelin Injections for Uterine Leiomyomas: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the noninferiority of relugolix compared with leuprorelin acetate in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine leiomyomas. METHODS: In a double-blind, double-dummy trial, premenopausal women with uterine leiomyomas and heavy menstrual bleeding defined as a pictorial blood loss assessment chart score of at least 120 were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to relugolix (40 mg, oral, once daily) or leuprorelin acetate (1.88 mg or 3.75 mg, monthly injection) for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a total pictorial blood loss assessment chart score of less than 10 for weeks 6-12. Secondary endpoints included myoma and uterine volumes, and hemoglobin levels. A sample size of 144 patients per group (n=288) was estimated to provide at least 90% power to demonstrate noninferiority (prespecified noninferiority margin -15%; one-sided 0.025 level of significance). RESULTS: From March 2016 to September 2017, 281 patients were randomized (relugolix, n=139, leuprorelin n=142). Demographic and baseline characteristics were well balanced; mean pictorial blood loss assessment chart score was 254.3 in the relugolix group and 263.7 in the leuprorelin group. The proportion of patients with total pictorial blood loss assessment chart score of less than 10 for weeks 6-12 was 82.2% in the relugolix group and 83.1% in the leuprorelin group, demonstrating noninferiority of relugolix compared with leuprorelin (relugolix-leuprorelin difference -0.9%; 95% CI: -10.10 to 8.35; prespecified noninferiority margin -15%; P=.001). Reductions in myoma and uterine volumes and increases in hemoglobin levels were comparable in the two groups. Relugolix was associated with an earlier effect on menstrual bleeding than leuprorelin (pictorial blood loss assessment chart score of less than 10, 64.2% vs 31.7% [relugolix-leuprorelin difference 32.5%; 95% CI: 20.95-44.13%] for weeks 2-6 and pictorial blood loss assessment chart score of 0, 52.6% vs 21.8% [30.7%; 95% CI: 19.45-42.00%] for weeks 2-6) and faster recovery of menses after treatment discontinuation (relugolix median [Q1, Q3], 37 days [32.0, 46.0]; leuprorelin median, 65 days [54.0, 77.0]). Adverse events and bone mineral density loss were similar between relugolix and leuprorelin treatment groups. CONCLUSION: In women with uterine leiomyomas, once-daily treatment with relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, demonstrated noninferiority to monthly leuprorelin for improvement of heavy menstrual bleeding at 6-12 weeks of treatment, had a more rapid effect on menstrual bleeding, and was generally well tolerated. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02655237; JAPIC Clinical Trial Information, JapicCTI-163128. FUNDING SOURCE: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and an affiliate of NovaQuest Capital Management LLC.