Verification of the junctional dose for irradiation of the chest wall and supraclavicular regions under the circumstances of advanced technologies.

A single-isocenter half-beam technique is commonly used when irradiating the chest wall and supraclavicular regions in patients with high-risk breast cancer. However, several studies have reported that underdosage can occur at the junction of the chest wall and supraclavicular regions due to a "tongue-and-groove" effect. This study verified the efficacy of an open leaf technique (OL-tech) that involves placing a multileaf collimator 5 mm outside from the beam central axis to remove the effect of the multileaf collimator in a single-isocenter half-beam technique. We compared the junction doses of the OL-tech with those of a conventional technique (C-tech) in square and clinical plans, using 4 and 10 MV x-rays in the Clinac iX and 6 and 10 MV x-rays in the Trilogy accelerators (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). EBT3 radiochromic films were used for measurements. Measurements were performed at a depth of 3 cm when verifying field matching. The EBT3 films in the square plan indicated junction doses for the C-tech of 78.3% with the Clinac iX accelerator and 73.6% with the Trilogy accelerator. By contrast, the corresponding doses for the OL-tech were 107.2% and 99.8%, respectively. In the clinical plan, the junction doses for the C-tech were 76.5% with the Clinac iX accelerator and 72.6% with the Trilogy accelerator; the corresponding doses for the OL-tech were 108.3% and 101.7%, respectively. As with the square plan, variations in the junction dose were much smaller using the OL-tech than using the C-tech. Our results suggest that the OL-tech can be useful for improving dose homogeneity at the junction of the chest wall and supraclavicular regions.

Patterns of Care Study quantitative evaluation of the quality of radiotherapy in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Quality assurance (QA) of clinical practice is important for any medical specialty. Programs based on the Patterns of Care Study (PCS) have been developed to compare the quality of radiotherapeutic care at individual institutions, with the national average representing the process and outcome of radiotherapy. The feasibility of these programs was analyzed. METHODS: Calculation programs for the national average and standard score were developed to evaluate quantitatively the process and outcome of radiotherapy at individual institutions as well as at the national level. The programs were used to evaluate the quality of radiotherapy for 561 esophageal carcinoma patients surveyed in the Japanese PCS. RESULTS: As a representative example of QA measurement, the national average for the 5-year survival rate for these patients in the nonsurgery group was 5%. The regional averages for those in academic and nonacademic institutions were 9% and 1%, respectively (P = 0.0142), showing a significant difference between these two institutional strata. The standard score compared with the national average for institution No.105, for example, was 16.3 (P < 0.0001), with the positive value indicating that the outcome at this institution was significantly higher than the national average. The corresponding figure compared with the regional average was -0.3 (P = 0.7391), with the negative value indicating the outcome is not superior to the regional average of academic institutions. CONCLUSIONS: These programs make it possible to compare quantitatively the quality of radiation therapy at individual institutions with the national and regional averages. They should also be useful for nationwide QA projects in radiation oncology as well as in other medical specialities.