Multiple Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors Associated with Long-term Use of a Proton Pump Inhibitor and a Potassium-competitive Acid Blocker.

A 52-year-old man who had been using a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and a potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) for 14 years underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy and was found to have three neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in the gastric body. Following detailed examinations, parietal cell dysfunction was excluded, and the NETs did not meet the criteria for the Rindi classification types I-III. The lesions were ultimately considered to be associated with the long-term use of the PPI and P-CAB. We performed endoscopic submucosal dissection of the lesions, with no recurrence or new lesions noted after discontinuation of the PPI and P-CAB.

[Cystoid macular edema secondary to albumin-bound paclitaxel therapy for pancreatic cancer].

Cystoid macular edema (CME) is a rare adverse event induced by taxane-based chemotherapy. Here, we describe the case of a 71-year-old man who developed bilateral CME during treatment with nab-paclitaxel (nab-PTX) for unresectable pancreatic cancer. Two months after drug discontinuation, his vision improved, and there was significant reduction in the CME on optical coherence tomography. CME is an adverse event that can be treated with the early withdrawal of nab-PTX. Oncologists who use nab-PTX should be aware of this adverse event for timely patient referral to an ophthalmologist and appropriate treatment that would enable the preservation of the patient's visual acuity.

An Autopsy Case of Anaplastic Carcinoma of the Pancreas in a 39-Year-Old Woman that Developed from Hereditary Pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND Anaplastic carcinoma of the pancreas (ACP) is a rare type of cancer with an extremely poor prognosis. Hereditary pancreatitis is a rare autosomal-dominant disease. It progresses to chronic pancreatitis at a young age, increasing the risk of pancreatic cancer. CASE REPORT A 39-year-old woman was diagnosed with chronic pancreatitis at the age of 18 years. The patient was referred to our hospital for epigastralgia and jaundice. We identified a tumor mass at the head of the pancreas using contrast computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) of the abdomen. Tissue biopsy revealed ACP of the spindle cell type. We started the patient on combination chemotherapy using gemcitabine and nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab) -paclitaxel, but she died 1 month after her first visit. An autopsy revealed a mixture of tubular adenocarcinoma and anaplastic carcinoma. We performed genetic analysis using DNA samples from the biopsy tissues but did not find mutations in the PRSS1 and SPINK1 genes associated with hereditary pancreatitis. CONCLUSIONS The risk of pancreatic cancer generally increases in patients with hereditary pancreatitis after 50 years of age. However, in this case, the development of pancreatic cancer occurred at a younger age, suggesting the importance of early detection in such cases. Furthermore, this case suggests that EUS is a useful method for monitoring patients with hereditary pancreatitis and the diagnosis of ACP.

Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection: a new endoscopic method for resection of rectal neuroendocrine tumor grade 1 (carcinoid) ≤ 10 mm in diameter.

Background and study aims Rectal neuroendocrine tumors grade 1 (NET G1; carcinoid) ≤ 10 mm in diameter often extend into the submucosa, making their complete histological resection difficult using endoscopic techniques. Endoscopic submucosal resection with a ligation device (ESMR-L) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are commonly used to overcome these difficulties. We also previously reported that underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) could facilitate resection of rectal NET G1. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of UEMR for removing rectal NET G1 ≤ 10 mm in diameter. 6 consecutive patients with rectal NET G1 ≤ 10 mm in diameter underwent UEMR at our hospital. The rate of en bloc resection was 100 %, and the rate of R0 resection was 83 %. The median procedure time was 8 min (range 5 - 12 min). No perforations or delayed bleeding occurred in this study. In conclusion, UEMR allows the safe and reliable resection of rectal NET G1 ≤ 10 mm in diameter with comparable results to ESMR-L or ESD, including high en bloc and R0 resection rates with no increase in significant adverse events. A multicenter trial is required to confirm the validity of the present results.

Cold snare polypectomy reduced delayed postpolypectomy bleeding compared with conventional hot polypectomy: a propensity score-matching analysis.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) for small colorectal polyps has lower incidence of adverse events, especially delayed postpolypectomy bleeding (DPPB). However, few data are available on comparisons of the incidence of DPPB of CSP and hot polypectomy (HP). The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of DPPB after CSP and compare it with that of HP. A propensity score model was used as a secondary analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a single municipal hospital. We identified 539 patients with colorectal polyps from 2 mm to 11 mm in size who underwent CSP (804 polyps in 330 patients) or HP (530 polyps in 209 patients) between July 2013 and June 2015. RESULTS: There were no cases of DPPB in the CSP group. Conversely, DPPB occurred in 4 patients (1.9 %) after HP, resulting in a significant difference between the CSP and HP groups (0.008 % vs 0 %, P  = 0.02). Propensity score-matching analysis created 402 matched pairs, yielding a significantly higher DPPB rate in the HP group than CSP group (0.02 % vs 0 %, P  = 0.04). However, significantly more patients in the CSP group had unclear horizontal margins that precluded assessment (83 vs 38 cases, P  < 0.001). The retrieval failure rate was significantly higher in the CSP group than in the HP group (3 % vs 0.7 %, P  = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: DPPB was less frequent with CSP than HP, as selected by the propensity score-matching model. Our findings indicate that CSP is recommended polypectomy in daily clinical setting. However, special care should be taken during polyp retrieval and horizontal margin assessment, and these issues could be taken into account in follow-up after CSP.

Gastric atrophy and xanthelasma are markers for predicting the development of early gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: The significance of gastric xanthelasma in relation to gastric cancer still remains unclear. We investigated whether gastric xanthelasma would be a useful marker for predicting the development of early gastric cancer. METHODS: A total of 1823 patients who underwent a medical health checkup were enrolled. We examined the relationship between gastric xanthelasma and various clinical features, and in an endoscopic follow-up study investigated whether the presence of gastric xanthelasma was predictive of the development of early gastric cancer. RESULTS: In the initial endoscopic examination, gastric xanthelasma was detected in 107 (5.9 %) of the 1823 patients. The presence of gastric xanthelasma was significantly associated with age ≥65 years, male gender, open-type atrophy, and the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001, and p < 0.0001, respectively). During the endoscopic follow-up period, early gastric cancer was found in 29 (1.6 %) of the 1823 patients. Gastric cancer occurred in 15 (14.0 %) of 107 patients with gastric xanthelasma, whereas it occurred in 14 (0.8 %) of 1716 patients without (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that open-type atrophy and gastric xanthelasma were independently related to the development of gastric cancer (odds ratio 7.19 [2.50-20.83]; p = 0.0003 and 5.85 [2.67-12.82]; p < 0.0001, respectively). The presence of gastric xanthelasma was significantly predictive of gastric cancer development even in the selected high-risk groups with open-type atrophy or DM (p < 0.0001 or p < 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Gastric xanthelasma is a useful marker for predicting the development of gastric cancer.