Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Gen Intern Med ; 8(10): 573-5, 1993 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8271091

ABSTRACT

The authors assessed whether the lack of weekend cardiac test availability significantly contributed to weekend delays in hospital discharge for "low-risk" chest pain patients. Mean lengths of stay were compared for late-week versus early-week admissions. Patients with late-week admissions had a 19% greater length of stay than did patients admitted earlier in the week (2.36 +/- 1.87 vs 1.91 +/- 1.21 days, p = 0.10, with p = 0.015 after adjusting for severity of illness). Cardiac diagnostic tests were ordered for only 4% of study patients. Therefore, the "weekend effect" existed in an environment where cardiac diagnostic tests were infrequently ordered.


Subject(s)
Chest Pain , Health Services Accessibility , Heart Function Tests , Length of Stay , Patient Discharge , Adult , Aged , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Critical Care/economics , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Admission , Risk , Time
2.
Am J Cardiol ; 71(4): 259-62, 1993 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8427164

ABSTRACT

There are few available data on the effectiveness and safety of medical practice guidelines when used for patient care in the coronary and intermediate care units. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of educating physicians about practice guidelines to promote shorter lengths of stay for "low-risk" patients hospitalized with chest pain. Such guidelines were disseminated to physicians working in a health maintenance organization (HMO) by educational conferences, written memoranda, endorsement by opinion leaders, concurrent written feedback, and nursing-to-physician cues. A total of 208 patients were enrolled in the study. Following implementation of the practice guidelines, hospital lengths of stay were reduced from 2.51 +/- 2.1 to 1.96 +/- 1.3 days (22% reduction, p = 0.03) and intermediate care unit lengths of stay from 33.9 +/- 19 to 28.2 +/- 14 hours (17% reduction, p = 0.02) for patients with low-risk chest pain. The reduction in length of stay for patients with low-risk chest pain exceeded reductions in stay for patients hospitalized with cardiac conditions for which no guidelines were introduced. None of the patients treated according to guideline recommendations had unexpected "life-threatening" adverse events in the 2-week period after hospital discharge (95%, confidence interval 0%, 3%). This study supports the effectiveness and possible safety of practice guidelines to reduce lengths of stay for patients with low-risk chest pain.


Subject(s)
Cardiology Service, Hospital/standards , Chest Pain/therapy , Health Maintenance Organizations/standards , Length of Stay/trends , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Aged , California , Cardiology Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Chest Pain/diagnosis , Chest Pain/epidemiology , Chi-Square Distribution , Coronary Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Feedback , Female , Health Maintenance Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Observer Variation , Patient Education as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...