Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 4(2): 241-8, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17600492

ABSTRACT

In 2003 the United States Department of Agriculture established USDA VetNet. It was modeled after PulseNet USA, the national molecular subtyping network for foodborne disease surveillance. The objectives of USDA VetNet are: to use pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) to subtype zoonotic pathogens submitted to the animal arm of the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS); examine VetNet and PulseNet PFGE patterns; and use the data for surveillance and investigation of suspected foodborne illness outbreaks. Whereas PulseNet subtypes 7 foodborne disease-causing bacteria- Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella, Shigella, Listeria monocytogenes, Campylobacter, Yersinia pestis, and Vibrio cholerae-VetNet at present subtypes nontyphoidal Salmonella serotypes and Campylobacter from animals, including diagnostic specimens, healthy farm animals, and carcasses of food-producing animals at slaughter. By the end of 2005, VetNet had two functioning databases: the NARMS Salmonella and the NARMS Campylobacter databases. The Salmonella database contained 6763 Salmonella isolates and 2514 unique XbaI patterns, while the Campylobacter database contained 58 Campylobacter isolates and 53 unique SmaI patterns. Both databases contain the PFGE tagged image file format (TIFF) images, demographic information, and the antimicrobial resistance profiles assigned by NARMS. In the future, veterinary diagnostic laboratories will be invited to participate in VetNet. The establishment of USDA VetNet enhances the mission of the agriculture and public health communities in the surveillance and investigation of foodborne illness outbreaks.


Subject(s)
Campylobacter/classification , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Food Microbiology , Phylogeny , Salmonella/classification , Veterinary Medicine/organization & administration , Animals , Campylobacter/isolation & purification , Databases, Factual , Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field , Humans , Information Services , Salmonella/isolation & purification , Sentinel Surveillance/veterinary , Serotyping , United States , United States Department of Agriculture
2.
J Am Vet Med Assoc ; 228(10): 1524-32, 2006 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16677120

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate Salmonella enterica infections at a Greyhound breeding facility. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. ANIMAL AND SAMPLE POPULATIONS: 138 adult and juvenile dogs and S. enterica isolates recovered from the dogs and their environment. PROCEDURES: The investigation was conducted at the request of a Greyhound breeder. Observations regarding the environment and population of dogs were recorded. Fecal, food, and environmental specimens were collected and submitted for Salmonella culture. Isolates were serotyped and tested for susceptibility to 16 antimicrobials. Isolates underwent genetic analyses by use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and ribotyping. RESULTS: S. enterica was recovered from 88 of 133 (66%) samples of all types and from 57 of 61 (93%) fecal samples. Eighty-three (94.3%) of the isolates were serotype Newport, 77 (87.5%) of which had identical resistance phenotypes. Genetic evaluations suggested that several strains of S. enterica existed at the facility, but there was a high degree of relatedness among many of the Newport isolates. Multiple strains of Salmonella enterica serotype Newport were recovered from raw meat fed on 1 day. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: S. enterica infections and environmental contamination were common at this facility. A portion of the Salmonella strains detected on the premises was likely introduced via raw meat that was the primary dietary constituent. Some strains appeared to be widely disseminated in the population. Feeding meat that had not been cooked properly, particularly meat classified as unfit for human consumption, likely contributed to the infections in these dogs.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed/microbiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Dog Diseases/epidemiology , Food Contamination/analysis , Salmonella Infections, Animal/epidemiology , Salmonella enterica/isolation & purification , Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Animals , Breeding , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disease Outbreaks/veterinary , Dog Diseases/etiology , Dog Diseases/microbiology , Dogs , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Environmental Microbiology , Feces/microbiology , Female , Food Microbiology , Genotype , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/veterinary , Phylogeny , Salmonella Infections, Animal/etiology , Salmonella Infections, Animal/microbiology , Salmonella enterica/classification , Salmonella enterica/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...