Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes of IVF twins after fresh embryo transfer versus frozen-thawed embryo transfer.

Objectives The limited data regarding obstetrical outcomes in multiple pregnancies following both fresh embryo transfer and frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET), along with the association between multiple pregnancies and increased pregnancy complications compared to singleton pregnancies, highlights the need for research on this topic. Therefore, this study aimed to compare obstetrical and neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies after fresh embryo transfer versus FET. Design A retrospective single-center study. Participants IVF dichorionic twin pregnancies ≥23 weeks of gestation during 2010-2022. Setting Galilee Medical Center, a tertiary-care university affiliated hospital, Israel. Methods We conducted a comparative analysis of obstetrical and neonatal outcomes between IVF dichorionic twin pregnancies after fresh embryo transfer and those after FET. This analysis included variables such as gestational age at delivery, birthweight, preterm birth rates, low birthweight rates, neonatal intensive care unit admissions and complications related to prematurity. Results The study included 389 IVF twin pregnancies: 253 after fresh embryo transfer and 136 after FET. Following fresh embryo transfer compared to FET, the mean gestational age at delivery was earlier (34.92 vs. 35.88 weeks, p=0.001) and the rate of preterm birth (<37 weeks) was higher (70.4% vs. 53.7%, p=0.001). This difference in gestational age at delivery remained significant after adjustment for maternal age, parity, and BMI (OR=2.11, 95% CI 2.11-3.27, p=0.001). Similarly, the difference in preterm birth rates remained significant after adjustment of the same variables (p=0.001). For the fresh embryo transfer compared to the FET group, the mean birthweight was lower (2179.72 vs. 2353.35 grams, p=0.003); and low birthweight and very low birthweight rates were higher (71.2% vs. 56.3%, p<0.001 and 13.5% vs. 6.7%, p=0.004, respectively). For the fresh embryo transfer compared to the FET group, the proportions were higher of neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (23.3% vs. 16.0%, p=0.019), of neonates with respiratory distress syndrome (10.5% vs. 5.9%, p=0.045) and those needing phototherapy (23.3% vs. 16.0%, p=0.019). Limitations Limitations of the study include its retrospective nature. Furthermore, we were unable to adjust for some confounders, such as the number of eggs retrieved, the number of embryos transferred, and methods for ovarian stimulation or preparation of the endometrium for embryo transfer. Conclusions Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes of twin pregnancies were worse after fresh embryo transfer than after FET. The findings support favorable fetal outcomes after FET and support the current trend of shifting from fresh embryo transfer to FET. Prospective studies are needed to support our results.

Same-day Discharge after Robotic Hysterectomy for Benign Conditions: Feasibility and Safety.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and predictive factors for same-day discharge (SDD) after robotic hysterectomy (RH) for benign indications to optimize patient selection by incorporating preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables. DESIGN: A single-center retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary academic hospital. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing RH for benign indications. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were designated for SDD by implementing enhanced recovery after surgery protocol. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The study included 890 patients who underwent RH for benign indications between the years 2016 and 2021. Of these, 618 (69.4%) were discharged the same day and 272 (30.5%) were admitted for overnight stay. Both groups had similar age (46.4 vs 46.2 years), body mass index (28.3 vs 28.9), and indications for surgery. In multivariable logistic regression, factors that were significant for overnight stay were American Society of Anesthesiologists score 3, Charlson comorbidity index, previous laparotomy, and operative time. Other factors such as surgery start time and preoperative hemoglobin levels were not statistically significant. Postoperative outcomes were comparable for both groups with similar readmission and reoperation rates. CONCLUSION: The likelihood of SDD after RH in this cohort after implementing enhanced recovery after surgery protocol was almost 70%, and most of the predictive factors for overnight stay were nonmodifiable. Importantly, both groups had similar outcomes after surgery.

Does fresh single embryo transfer outcome predict the result of a subsequent vitrified-warmed blastocyst of the same cohort?

Reflecting the current trends, the utilization of frozen-thawed transfer cycles has been steadily increasing worldwide; outcome predictors of these cycles are therefore a major research goal. Our aim was to investigate whether the outcome of a fresh single blastocyst transfer (SBT) can serve as a prognostic factor for the subsequent vitrified-warmed SBT originating from the same cohort. A retrospective cohort study was performed at a single unit. Non-donor fresh cycles were analyzed as predictors of the following vitrified-warmed cycle. Only SBTs were included. Cycles designated to a freeze-all policy and cycles involving pre-implantation genetic analysis were excluded. A total of 1127 vitrified-warmed single blastocyst cycles were included. The indications for artificial reproductive technologies were comparable across the study groups. Vitrified-warmed cycles following a live birth outcome in the fresh cycle were more likely to result in a clinical pregnancy than those following a fresh cycle, which failed to reach a live birth. The same trend was observed for live birth rate following vitrified-warmed transfer in the fresh cycle. After correcting for possible confounders, age and embryo quality were significantly correlated with the chance for a live birth, but the previous fresh cycle did not affect the results. We therefore conclude that after adjustment for age, embryo quality and number of previous oocyte retrieval cycles, the fresh cycle outcome was not a significant influential factor for the following vitrified-warmed cycle.

Histopathological profile of women who had previously failed in-vitro fertilization and the association to the outcome in the subsequent in-vitro fertilization cycle.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the endometrial histopathological profile of patients undergoing curettage and the association of the histopathological profile with the pregnancy outcome during the subsequent in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, a total of 248 women with at least one failed attempt of IVF and who underwent curettage and a subsequent IVF were included. Demographic data, endometrial histopathological records, stimulation information, and pregnancy outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: The histopathological analysis of endometrial tissues showed that 130 women (52.4%) had endometrial pathologies. Of these women, 103 (41.5%) had endometrial polyps, 22 (8.9%) had chronic endometritis, and five (2.0%) had both polyps and endometritis. No statistical difference was observed between the normal histopathology group and the abnormal histopathology group in the outcome of the subsequent IVF cycle. Subgroup analyses were performed to further characterize and compare women with normal histopathology and women with endometrial polyps (polyp subgroup) or chronic endometritis (endometritis subgroup). No statistical differences were found among the three groups in the rates of pregnancy (44.1% vs. 49.5% vs. 45.5%, P=0.72), biochemical pregnancy loss (13.5% vs. 15.7% vs. 20.0%, P=0.86), clinical pregnancy loss (25.0% vs. 31.4% vs. 30.0%, P=0.77), and live birth (27.1% vs. 26.2% vs. 22.7%, P=0.91) during the subsequent IVF cycle. CONCLUSION: Women with previously failed IVF and abnormal endometrial histopathology treated with curettage had the same outcome in the subsequent IVF cycle as women with normal endometrial histopathology.

Inconsistencies between endometrial receptivity assay and Adhesio-RT test for the window of implantation in women with repetitive failed donor oocyte embryo transfers.

Two commercially available second-generation endometrial receptivity assays using microarray analysis or next-generation sequencing are available in the market: endometrial receptivity assay (ERA) (Igenomix Laboratories) and Adhesio RT (OVO laboratories, Montreal, Canada). Little is known about how the results of these tests compare. We present a case of a subject with repetitive failed donor oocyte embryo transfer, who underwent evaluation of endometrial receptivity using both the Adhesio and ERA tests. These two tests did not provide consistent results, with ERA suggesting receptivity on day 5 of progesterone treatment and Adhesio suggesting receptivity on the eighth day. An ERA test subsequently performed on the eighth day of progesterone treatment was suggestive of post-receptive endometrium during the same time frame that Adhesio was suggestive of receptive endometrium. In conclusion, it is important to note that these two tests may not provide consistent results in at least some subjects. Therefore, intertest validity studies are recommended.

Can in vitro maturation overcome cycles with repeated oocyte maturation arrest? A classification system for maturation arrest and a cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of gonadotropin-stimulated and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) -primed in vitro oocyte maturation (IVM) in cases of repeated in vitro fertilization (IVF) failure due to various forms of oocyte maturation arrest (OMA). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. RESULTS: In all, 63 women with IVF failure due to OMA were evaluated in this study. According to the Hatirnaz & Dahan classification, 11 (17.5%) women were OMA type 1, 22 (34.9%) were OMA type 2, 0 were OMA type 3, 11 (17.5%) were OMA type 4, and 19 women were OMA type 5 (30.1%). Fewer oocytes were retrieved in the IVM than in the IVF cycles. No embryos were produced from oocytes collected in the IVM cycles of women with OMA types 1, 2, and 4. In the OMA type 5 group, 9 (47.4%) day 2 embryos and 6 (31.6%) day 3 embryos were obtained. The difference between the groups was statistically significant (P = 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Single day 3 embryo transfer was performed for the six patients with OMA type 5 but no clinical pregnancies occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Follicle-stimulating hormone-stimulated and hCG-primed IVM does not improve oocyte maturation, developmental potential, or pregnancy rates of women with OMA. Future studies directed to re-establishing normal cytoskeletal architecture and machinery, and resumption of meiosis may be beneficial for obtaining mature oocytes.

Effect of uterine dimensions on live birth rates after single embryo transfer in infertile women.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Do uterine size parameters measured by baseline transvaginal ultrasound predict live birth after single embryo transfer (SET) of a high-quality blastocyst? DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study including women undergoing their first SET between August 2010 and March 2014 at a large university hospital reproductive centre. The effects of baseline uterine dimensions on live birth rate (LBR) were analysed while controlling for confounding effects. RESULTS: A total of 437 nulliparous and 70 parous women were included. The nulliparous group had lower body mass index (BMI) (24.4 ± 5.1 versus 25.9 ± 4.5 kg/m2; P = 0.015) and a higher number of fibroids (0.4 ± 1.0 versus 0.2 ± 0.5; P = 0.005) than the parous group. While controlling for confounding effects, none of the uterine parameters appeared to be a significant predictor of LBR among nulliparous and parous women (P > 0.05 in all cases). A subsequent analysis of endometrial length was done, whereby the endometrial lengths were divided into quartiles (20.0-32.2 mm; 32.3-36.5 mm; 36.6-40.0 mm; 40.1-54.0 mm). After controlling for confounders, the shortest quartile in the nulliparous group had a significantly lower LBR (P = 0.02) than the other groups. Receiver operating characteristic curves suggested that endometrial cavity length and cervical length did not aid clinically. CONCLUSION: Uterine parameters do not have a clinically useful impact on LBR after SET of a blastocyst in infertile women. The use of baseline endometrial length to predict live birth is no better than chance, while cervical length only predicts failure to live birth.

A comparison of IVF outcomes transferring a single ideal blastocyst in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and normal ovulatory controls.

PURPOSE: To assess the effects PCOS on live birth rates when transferring a single fresh ideal blastocyst. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study performed at the university-affiliated reproductive center. Women with PCOS and a control group of normal ovulatory women who underwent their first fresh embryo transfer with single ideal grade blastocyst were included in the study. Demographic, stimulation information and pregnancy outcomes were collected and analysed. The primary outcome was live birth rates, and secondary outcomes included pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates. RESULTS: 71 Women with PCOS and 272 normal ovulatory controls underwent their first embryo transfer and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. PCOS patient were younger (31.0 ± 3.7 vs. 33.1 ± 3.2, p = 0.0001), with higher AFC (40.0 ± 9.3 vs. 13.3 ± 4.6, p = 0.0001), required lower dose of gonadotropins to stimulate (1198 ± 786 vs. 1891 ± 1224, p = 0.0001), and had higher serum testosterone levels (2.3 ± 0.7 vs. 1.1 ± 0.3, p = 0.0001). No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding the number of previous pregnancies, the number of previous full-term pregnancies, the level of basal serum FSH, estradiol level at triggering and the BMI. When compared by Chi squared testing pregnancy rates, clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates did not differ. However, when controlling (with multivariate stepwise logistic regression) for confounders, live birth rates were lower among the women with PCOS (p = 0.035, CI: 0.18-0.92). CONCLUSION: After controlling for confounders, when transferring a fresh single ideal blastocyst, live birth rates were lower among the women with PCOS than normal ovulatory controls.

Added Benefit of Immature Oocyte Maturation for Fertility Preservation in Women with Malignancy.

To assess the added value of maturing immature oocytes collected during fertility preservation treatments in women with malignancy. A retrospective case-control study analyzing the results of 327 cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation treatments. Oocyte maturation rates and cycle parameters were compared between 3 types of fertility preservation treatments: (1) stimulated IVF cycle (n = 143), (2) non-stimulated IVM cycle (n = 158), (3) follicle aspiration and oocyte collection from ovarian tissue prepared for ovarian tissue cryopreservation followed by in vitro maturation of the immature oocytes (n = 48). The primary outcome measure was the maturation rate and the number of mature oocytes. The secondary outcomes were oocyte fertilization and embryo development rates. The mean maturation rate in IVF cycles was 38% and in the non-stimulated IVM cycles was 55%. In women who chose to cryopreserve their embryos, similar fertilization and embryo cleavage rates were found in oocytes that matured after stimulated IVF cycles compared to non-stimulated IVM cycles. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist triggering, treatment with aromatase inhibitor, or oral contraceptives use before the cycle did not affect the maturation rate. Ovarian stimulation yields the highest number of oocytes or embryos for cryopreservation. Although the maturation rate of immature oocytes collected in stimulated IVF cycles is low, it is still a viable source of oocytes that can be used to improve the efficacy of fertility preservation treatments by increasing the number of mature oocytes available for freezing or fertilization.

Pretreatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and an aromatase inhibitor may improve outcomes in in vitro fertilization cycles of women with stage I-II endometriosis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether 2 months of pretreatment with 5 mg of letrozole daily plus leuprolide acetate at 3.75 mg monthly in women with laparoscopically confirmed American Society of Reproductive Medicine stage I-II endometriosis improves in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: University-affiliated tertiary hospital. PATIENT(S): Women with laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis treated in the period from 2012 to 2016. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcomes: clinical pregnancy and live-birth rate; secondary outcomes: stimulation parameters and pregnancy. RESULT(S): A total of 68 patients were included in the final analysis. Thirty-six women received a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and an aromatase inhibitor (AI), and 32 women received a GnRH agonist alone. The women did not differ in mean age, antral follicle count, basal serum level of follicle-stimulating hormone, or previous pregnancies. The stimulation parameters were similar between both groups: gonadotropin dose, number of collected oocytes, number of blastocysts. All women underwent a single blastocyst transfer. The grade of embryos transferred did not differ. Clinical pregnancy (24 [66.7%] vs. 13 [40.6%]) and live-birth (22 [61.1%] vs 10 [31.3%]) rates improved with aromatase inhibitor added to the GnRH agonist treatment versus a GnRH agonist alone. CONCLUSION(S): In this study, we present the first comparison in the medical literature comparing IVF outcomes in women with minimal and mild endometriosis pretreated with a GnRH agonist with or without an AI. This prospective cohort study suggests that combining these two treatment modalities which work at different sites may improve pregnancy outcomes with IVF treatment.

When to do intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective comparison.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to assess the fertilization rate and embryo development in sibling human oocytes after split insemination in patients with and without isolated teratozoospermia. METHODS: A prospective cohort study at a university affiliated reproduction center was performed. Hundred and three patients during the time periods 01-2013 to 12-2015 had split insemination ordered for their first IVF cycle. The primary outcome measured was fertilization rate. Secondary outcomes were the number and quality of embryos. RESULTS: Mature oocytes at the time of collection were assigned as follows: 558 to IVF and 556 to ICSI. An additional 48 immature oocytes matured while awaiting spontaneous fertilization with IVF for a total of 606 in that group. The study group of normal strict sperm morphology ≤ 4 included 61 patients, and the control group included 42 patients with normal strict sperm morphology > 4. ICSI was statistically favored over IVF only in cases with normal strict sperm morphology ≤ 4%. There was a higher fertilization rate in ICSI compared to IVF (74.4% vs. 38%, p < 0.0001), a higher number of day 2 (4 ± 3.4 vs. 2.4 ± 2.7, p < 0.0001), day 3 (4 ± 3.4 vs. 2.2 ± 2.7, p < 0.0001) and day 5 embryos (2.2 ± 2.6 vs. 1.2 ± 2, p = 0.001), and they were of better quality; however, it did not reach significance (p = 0.062). A similar advantage for ICSI was seen in a subgroup of unexplained infertility with normal strict sperm morphology > 4%. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, in couples with normal strict sperm morphology ≤ 4%, there is an advantage of ICSI over IVF in terms of fertilization rate, quantity and quality of cleavage stage embryos and blastocysts. Based on the results, ICSI seems reasonable as a first-line treatment in patients with normal strict sperm morphology ≤ 4%, as well as in patients with unexplained infertility.

Use of cabergoline and post-collection GnRH antagonist administration for prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does the addition of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist to cabergoline treatment during the luteal phase in fresh IVF cycles triggered with a GnRH agonist, and planned for freeze-all, reduce the rate of mild and moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS)? DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of 480 IVF patients at risk for OHSS with GnRH agonist trigger from 2011 to 2018, stratified into three groups based on treatment received: GnRH agonist trigger alone (Group 1, n = 208), GnRH agonist trigger + cabergoline (Group 2, n = 167) or GnRH agonist trigger + cabergoline + GnRH antagonist (Group 3, n = 105). Data on patient demographics, incidence, severity and symptomatology of OHSS and laboratory findings were collected. RESULTS: Group 1 had more free peritoneal fluid than Group 2 (28% versus 19%, P = 0.04) or Group 3 (28% versus 5%, P = 0.001). Group 1 reported abdominal discomfort and bloating more than Group 2 (33% versus 21%, P = 0.01) or Group 3 (33% versus 18%, P = 0.006). Group 1 had more electrolyte abnormalities than Group 2, who had more than Group 3. No patients developed severe OHSS. Mild and moderate OHSS rate was higher in Group 1 (38%) than Group 2 (29%, P = 0.048) or Group 3 (18%, P = 0.006) and in Group 2 than Group 3 (P = 0.046). CONCLUSION: Addition of cabergoline to GnRH agonist triggering in high-risk OHSS patients, and subsequent addition of GnRH antagonist for 5 days in the luteal phase, sequentially reduces the risk of mild and moderate OHSS and improves patient comfort compared with GnRH agonist trigger alone.

Effect of GnRH agonist and letrozole treatment in women with recurrent implantation failure.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the influence of dual suppression with the use of GnRH agonist plus aromatase inhibitor compared with suppression with the use of GnRH agonist alone or no suppression at all in patients with idiopathic recurrent implantation failure (RIF). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University-affiliated reproductive center. PATIENT(S): A total of 523 infertile women who failed two blastocyst transfers underwent a third frozen blastocyst transfer. Women with known endometriosis were excluded. INTERVENTION(S): A total of 204 subjects were not pretreated, 143 received 2 months of GnRH agonist (3.75 mg intramuscular leuprolide acetate monthly) only, and 176 received GnRH agonist and aromatase inhibitor (5 mg oral letrozole daily for 60 days). Demographic and stimulation information was collected and cycle outcomes reported. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rates. RESULT(S): Age, antral follicle count, basal FSH levels, duration of infertility, previous pregnancies, and full-term deliveries were similar (P>.05). Clinical pregnancy rates were higher among women who received GnRH agonist plus letrozole compared with women who received GnRH agonist only or women without pretreatment (63%, 42%, and 40%, respectively; P<.0001). Live birth rates were higher among women who received GnRH agonist plus letrozole compared with the other groups (56%, 36%, and 34%; P<.0001). No differences in pregnancy outcomes were noted between patients who did not receive pretreatment and those in the GnRH agonist only group. CONCLUSION(S): In patients with RIF, treatment with a GnRH agonist plus letrozole may improve live birth rates in subsequent cycles. We hypothesize that this improvement is due to alterations in the endometrium receptivity or treatment of undiagnosed endometriosis.

A comparison of two months pretreatment with GnRH agonists with or without an aromatase inhibitor in women with ultrasound-diagnosed ovarian endometriomas undergoing IVF.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does the addition of an aromatase inhibitor improve IVF outcomes in women with endometriomas when pretreating them with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists? DESIGN: Retrospective two-centre cohort study involving 126 women aged 21-39 years who failed a previous IVF cycle and all subsequent embryo transfers and had sonographic evidence of endometriomas. Women were non-randomly assigned to either 3.75 mg intramuscular depo-leuprolide treatment alone or in combination with 5 mg of oral letrozole daily for 60 days prior to undergoing a fresh IVF cycle. Main outcome measures included clinical pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy rate after 24 weeks' gestation. RESULTS: Prior to treatment, antral follicle count (AFC), basal serum FSH and endometrioma diameter did not differ between groups. After treatment, AFC differed between letrozole and non-letrozole-treated groups (10.3 ± 2.0 versus 6.4 ± 2.5; P = 0.0001), as did mean endometrioma maximum diameter (1.8 ± 0.4 cm versus 3.2 ± 0.8 cm; P = 0.0001). At IVF, the gonadotrophin dose used was significantly lower in letrozole-treated subjects (2079 ± 1119 versus 3716 ± 1314; P = 0.0001), the number of mature oocytes collected was greater (9.1 ± 2.4 versus 4.0 ± 1.7; P = 0.0001), as were the number of two-pronuclear embryos and number of blastocysts. The clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the letrozole-treated group (50% versus 22%, P = 0.003), as was the live birth rate (40% versus 17%, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of depo-leuprolide acetate monthly for 60 days combined with daily letrozole has better clinical outcomes at IVF in women with endometriomas than depo-leuprolide acetate treatment alone.

Dual oocyte retrieval and embryo transfer in the same cycle for women with premature ovarian insufficiency.

OBJECTIVE: To compare dual oocyte retrieval with minimal ovarian stimulation and embryo transfer in the same menstrual cycle versus conventional ovarian stimulation among women with premature ovarian insufficiency (POI). METHODS: A retrospective study of 51 women with POI attending a reproductive center in Turkey between 2013 and 2015. Women with an ovarian follicle of 12 mm or larger early in the follicular phase who underwent oocyte retrieval followed by an immediate cycle of ovarian stimulation (group 1, n=14) were compared with those who received conventional ovarian stimulation (group 2, n=37). Both groups underwent subsequent ovarian stimulation cycles to obtain optimally two embryos for transfer. RESULTS: The groups had similar baseline parameters. Serum estradiol was higher in group 1 (P<0.001); total number of oocyte retrievals was higher in group 2 (P<0.001); and total number of oocytes retrieved was similar (P=0.192). Group 1 had more higher-quality embryos (P=0.031). There was a non-significant trend toward higher live birth rates in the dual trigger group (28% vs 8%, P=0.08). CONCLUSION: Rescuing growing follicles early in the follicular phase combined with subsequent ovarian stimulation and embryo transfer in the same cycle resulted in fewer oocyte retrieval cycles and might potentially improve reproductive outcomes.

The Effect of Repeated Versus Initial Procalcitonin Measurements on Diagnosis of Infection in the Intensive Care Setting: A Prospective Observational Study.

Procalcitonin (PCT) measurement has been proposed to direct antibiotic use. We examined whether repeated PCT measurements (0, 6, and/or 12 hours) versus the initial measurement only (time 0) increased the sensitivity and specificity of PCT for diagnosing infection in intensive care unit patients. Infection was identified in 67/176 (38%) patients. The sensitivity of repeated versus the initial PCT measurement (with a cutoff value 0.5 ng/mL) was 52/67 (77%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 66%-87%) vs 46/67 (69%; 95% CI, 56%-79%; P = .04) and specificity 60/109 (55%; 95% CI, 45%-65%) vs 59/109 (54%; 95% CI, 44%-64%; P = 1.0). Repeat PCT evaluations over 12 hours did not provide a clinically significant improvement in diagnostic accuracy when compared to the initial single test.

The Effect of Assisted Hatching on Live Birth Rate Following Fresh Embryo Transfer in Advanced Maternal Age.

OBJECTIVE: Assisted hatching (AH) was introduced 3 decades ago as an adjunct method to in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer (ET) to improve embryo implantation rate. Limited data are available on the effect of AH on live birth rate (LBR) in advanced maternal age. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of AH on LBR in women aged 40 years and older. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study conducted at a single academic reproductive center. Women aged ≥40 years, who were undergoing their first IVF cycle were included. Laser-assisted hatching was the method used for AH and single or double embryos were transferred. Embryo transfer was performed at the cleavage or blastocyst stage. Separate analysis was performed on each ET stage. Live birth rate was the primary outcome. RESULTS: A total of 892 patients were included. Of these, 681 women underwent cleavage ET and 211 underwent blastocyst ET. The clinical pregnancy rate in the entire group was 15.3% and the LBR was 10.2%. Baseline and cycle parameters between the AH group and the control group were comparable. Assisted hatching in the cleavage stage was associated with lower clinical pregnancy rate (odds ratio [OR], 0.52; confidence interval [CI], 0.31-0.86; P = .012) and lower LBR (OR, 0.36; CI, 0.19-0.68; P = .001). Assisted hatching did not have any effect on outcomes in blastocyst ET. CONCLUSION: Assisted hatching does not improve the reproductive outcomes in advanced maternal age. Performing routine AH for the sole indication of advanced maternal age is not clinically justified.

Fresh transfer of Day 5 slow-growing embryos versus deferred transfer of vitrified, fully expanded Day 6 blastocysts: which is the optimal approach?

STUDY QUESTION: In IVF cycles in which the entire embryo cohort is slow growing, is it optimal to perform fresh transfer in Day 5 or to extend the culture and transfer in subsequent vitrified-warmed cycles? SUMMARY ANSWER: The outcomes depend on the degree of embryo development on Day 5. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Slow-growing blastocysts have lower implantation potential when transferred in fresh cycles. It has been suggested that embryo-endometrial asynchrony could explain this finding. However, studies that compared Days 5 and 6 embryos in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles showed contradictory results. There is still a lack of evidence regarding the best approach, performing fresh transfer or deferring transfer and continuing culture until fully developed blastocysts are achieved, when the entire cohort of embryos is slow growing. STUDY DESIGN SIZE, DURATION: This was a retrospective study that included 477 women aged <40 years who underwent fresh Day 5 single embryo transfer of slow-growing embryos and subsequent FET cycles of fully expanded blastocysts (FEB) originating from the same IVF cycle between 2012 and 2016. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The study included cycles in which the embryos either began blastulation by Day 5 of culture but did not reach the fully expanded stage (Gardner Stage III) or had delayed blastulation with only morula embryos present by Day 5 of culture. All of the subjects in the study underwent elective, single embryo transfer (slow or delayed blastocysts) on Day 5 and had at least one embryo that developed into a FEB on extended culture Day 6 that was suitable for vitrification. All subjects, regardless of the outcome of the fresh transfer, returned for at least one subsequent FET cycle of Day 6 embryos. MAIN RESULTS AND ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 1070 embryo transfer cycles (fresh + FET) were included. Of them, 365 women had elective, fresh, single transfer of slow-growing blastocysts (Group I) and 112 had elective, fresh, single morula transfer (Group II). Groups I and II underwent a subsequent 457 and 136 FET cycles, respectively. The mean age of Group I was 33.8 ± 2.9 years, the proportion of Day 5 embryos that developed to FEB by Day 6 was 92%, and the number of blastocysts vitrified was 627 (average of 1.71 blastocysts per cycle). The outcomes of fresh and FET cycles were comparable regarding clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) (31.0 vs. 30.4%, P = 0.86) and live birth rate (LBR) (23.3 vs. 20.3%, P = 0.15). In Group II, the mean age was 35.8 ± 3.4 years and the proportion of morula embryos that developed to FEB by Day 6 was 72%. The number of blastocysts vitrified on Day 6 was 155 (1.38 per cycle). The transfer of fresh embryos in Group II resulted in significantly lower clinical pregnancy (5.3 vs. 30.1%, P < 0.001) and LBRs (1.8 vs. 20.5%, P < 0.001). The results did not change after controlling for possible confounding factors. LIMITATIONS AND REASONS FOR CAUTION: The retrospective design of the study is a major limitation. Although we compared the outcomes of embryos that originated from the same cohort, the FET cycles could have been overrepresented by older patients and those with poorer prognoses. Furthermore, the study included only cycles in which there were blastocysts available for cryopreservation on Day 6; therefore, the results were not be applicable for those who had mandatory Day 5 transfer with no embryos available for vitrification. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Fresh transfer of embryos that begin blastulation on Day 5 results in similar outcomes to the transfer of FEB originating from the same cohort. However, in cases where only morula/compacting embryos are available by Day 5, extending culture until FEB are achieved and then performing subsequent FET will result in significantly higher LBRs. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding was used for this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Decrease in American birth rates makes it imperative for the United States to implement state mandated fertility coverage.

In recent years, the prevalence of infertility has increased due to delayed childbearing and an increase in the rate of male infertility. Given the high cost of fertility treatment, this option is not valid for families with a low income, and those who can afford it usually choose to have multiple embryo transfer, which has led to an increase in multiple birth rates and an increase in the cost of perinatal care. Due to the expected increase in infertility and decrease in the national live birth rate, the US should set a plan to fund infertility treatment and lead a policy for single embryo transfer. This will offset the decrease in the national birth rates and decrease expenditure on perinatal and neonatal complications resulting from multiple births.

Oocyte in vitro maturation: A sytematic review.

In vitro maturation (IVM) is one of the most controversial aspects of assisted reproductive technology. Although it has been studied extensively, it is still not a conventional treatment option and is accepted as an alternative treatment. However, studies have shown that IVM can be used in almost all areas where in vitro fertilization (IVF) is used and it has a strong place in fertility protection and Ovarian Hyperstimulation syndrome management. The aim of this systematic review was to address all aspects of the current knowledge of IVM treatment together with the evolution of IVM and IVF.