Hemianopic visual field defects elicit hemianopic scanning.

Previous explanations for the variability in success of compensating for homonymous hemianopia (HH) has been in terms of extent of the brain injury. In using on-line eye movement registrations, we simulated HH in 16 healthy subjects and compared their scanning performance on a dot counting task to their own "normal" condition and to real HH patients' performance. We evidenced clear parallels between simulated and real HH, suggesting that hemianopic scanning behaviour is primarily visually elicited, namely by the visual field defect, and not by the additional brain damage. We further observed age-related processes in compensating for the HH.

Grey scales uncover similar attentional effects in homonymous hemianopia and visual hemi-neglect.

Multi-component models of visual hemi-neglect have postulated that visual hemi-neglect is characterised by various attentional deficits. A grey scales task has been developed to quantify the early, automatic, (perhaps obligatory) ipsilesional orienting of visual attention, frequently assumed as the first of these attentional deficits. Explanations for this attentional imbalance are up until now mainly formulated in terms of right hemisphere activation. This lateral attentional bias has also been demonstrated in controls, in whom it is expressed as a leftward perceptual asymmetry. We reproduced previous literature findings on a grey scales task, considering controls and neglect patients. Three patients with neglect showed an extreme ipsilesional lateral bias. This bias did not change during or after cognitive rehabilitation. Additionally, we presented this grey scale task to 32 patients with left- and right-sided homonymous hemianopia (HP). HP is the loss of sight in one visual hemi-field. The HH patients had no clinical signs of impaired lateralised attention. Results revealed that HH patients showed a similar ipsilesional bias, albeit to a lesser degree than in neglect. Left-sided HH patients presented a quantitatively similar, but qualitatively opposite bias than the right-sided HH patients. We suggest that sensory effects can be an alternative source of attentional imbalance, which can interact with the previously proposed (right) hemispheric effects. This suggests that the perceptual asymmetry in the grey scales task is not necessarily an indicator of impaired right hemisphere attention. It rather suggests a pattern of functional cerebral asymmetry, which can also be caused by asymmetric sensory input.