Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Device Embolization (The LAAODE Study): Understanding the Timing and Clinical Consequences from a Worldwide Experience.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage occlusion device embolization (LAAODE) is rare but can have substantial implications on patient morbidity and mortality. Hence, we sought to perform an analysis to understand the timing and clinical consequences of LAAODE. METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed and Web of Science databases for LAAODE cases was performed from October 2nd, 2014 to November 1st, 2017. Prior to that, we included published LAAODE cases until October 1st, 2014 reported in the systematic review by Aminian et al. RESULTS: 103 LAAODE cases including Amplatzer cardiac plug (N=59), Watchman (N=31), Amulet (N=11), LAmbre (N=1) and Watchman FLX (N=1) were included. The estimated incidence of device embolization was 2% (103/5,000). LAAODE occurred more commonly in the postoperative period compared with intraoperative (61% vs. 39%). The most common location for embolization was the descending aorta 30% (31/103) and left atrium 24% (25/103) followed by left ventricle 20% (21/103). Majority of cases 75% (77/103) were retrieved percutaneously. Surgical retrieval occurred most commonly for devices embolized to the left ventricle, mitral apparatus and descending aorta. Major complications were significantly higher with postoperative LAAODE compared with intraoperative (44.4% vs. 22.5%, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: LAAODE is common with a reported incidence of 2% in our study. Post-operative device embolization occurred more frequently and was associated with a higher rate of complications than intraoperative device embolizations. Understanding the timings and clinical sequelae of DE can aid physicians with post procedural follow-up and also in the selection of patients for these procedures.

Indication, Patient Selection, and Referral Pathways for Left Atrial Appendage Closure.

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has emerged as a viable option for stroke prevention, especially in those intolerant of or not suitable for long-term oral anticoagulation therapy. This article describes the clinical characteristics, indications, and a proposed referral system for potential LAAC patients. Patient selection remains a challenge because of the paradox between the available randomized data on this intervention and the actual patient population who may gain maximum benefit. Further investigations comparing different LAAC devices with each other and with novel oral anticoagulants are needed. Also, the optimal antithrombotic regimen post-procedure has yet to be determined.

Inhaled nitric oxide in acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review.

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is usually a complication secondary to migration of a deep venous clot or thrombi to lungs, but other significant etiologies include air, amniotic fluid, fat, and bone marrow. Regardless of the underlying etiology, little progress has been made in finding an effective pharmacologic intervention for this serious complication. Among the wide spectrum of PE, massive PE is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality, primarily due to severely elevated pulmonary vascular resistance leading to right ventricular failure, hypoxemia, and cardiogenic shock. We currently have limited therapeutic options at our disposal. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) has been proposed as a potential therapeutic agent in cases of acute PE in which hemodynamic compromise secondary to increased pulmonary vascular resistance is present, based on iNO's selective dilation of the pulmonary vasculature and antiplatelet activity. A systematic search of studies using the PubMed database was undertaken in order to assess the available literature. Although there are currently no published randomized controlled trials on the subject, except a recently publish phase I trial involving eight patients, several case reports and case series describe and document the use of iNO in acute PE. The majority of published reports have documented improvements in oxygenation and hemodynamic variables, often within minutes of administration of iNO. These reports, when taken together, raise the possibility that iNO may be a potential therapeutic agent in acute PE. However, based on the current literature, it is not possible to conclude definitively whether iNO is safe and effective. These case reports underscore the need for randomized controlled trials to establish the safety and efficacy of iNO in the treatment of massive acute PE. The purpose of this article is to review the current literature in the use of iNO in the setting of PE given how acute PE causes acute onset of pulmonary hypertension.