Buprenorphine/naloxone micro-induction in a tertiary care hospital: a retrospective cohort analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the use of buprenorphine/naloxone micro-inductions in hospitalized patients and characterize the success rate of these inductions. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of hospitalized patients receiving a buprenorphine/naloxone micro-induction for opioid use disorder in a tertiary care hospital from Jan 2020-Dec 2020. The primary outcome was a description of the micro-induction prescribing patterns used. The secondary outcomes were a description of the demographic characteristics of patients, the estimated frequency of withdrawal symptoms experienced by patients undergoing a micro-induction, and the overall success rate of the micro-inductions defined as retention on buprenorphine/naloxone therapy with no precipitated withdrawal experienced. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were included in the analysis. Three main micro-induction regimens were identified, including rapid micro-inductions (8 patients), 0.5 mg SL BID initiations (6 patients), and 0.5 mg SL daily initiations (19 patients). Twenty-four patients (73%) met the criteria for a successful micro-induction, defined as being retained in buprenorphine/naloxone therapy with no precipitated withdrawal experienced. The most common reason for micro-induction failure was patient request to discontinue buprenorphine/naloxone therapy due to perceived adverse effects or personal preference. CONCLUSION: Buprenorphine/naloxone micro-induction in hospitalized patients resulted in a majority of patients being successfully initiated on buprenorphine/naloxone therapy without requiring opioid abstinence prior to induction. Dosing regimens were variable, and the ideal regimen remains unclear.

Efficacy and safety of erythropoietin and iron therapy to reduce red blood cell transfusion in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Iron restricted anemia is prevalent in surgical patients and is associated with an increased risk of allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and adverse events. Treatment of anemia includes oral and intravenous iron and erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs). More recent studies have focused on the use of intravenous iron as the primary approach to treating anemia. Nevertheless, the optimal treatment strategy for anemia remains to be established. Our primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ESA and iron therapy relative to iron therapy alone in reducing RBC transfusion in surgical patients. SOURCE: We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to May 2018. We included randomized-controlled trials in which adult surgical patients received an ESA and iron, vs iron alone, prior to cardiac and non-cardiac surgery. Our primary outcome was RBC transfusion rate. Secondary outcomes included hemoglobin concentration (post-treatment and postoperatively), number of RBC units transfused, mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), renal dysfunction, pulmonary embolism (PE), and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In total, 25 studies (4,719 participants) were included. Erythropoiesis stimulating agents and iron therapy reduced RBC transfusion relative to iron therapy (relative risk [RR] 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 0.71) without any change in mortality (RR 1.31; 95% CI, 0.80 to 2.16), stroke (RR 1.91; 95% CI, 0.63 to 5.76), MI (RR 1.12; 95% CI, 0.50 to 2.50), renal dysfunction (RR 0.96; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.26), PE (RR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.15 to 5.83), or DVT (RR 1.48; 95% CI, 0.95 to 2.31). CONCLUSION: Administration of ESA and iron therapy reduced the risk for RBC transfusion compared with iron therapy alone in patients undergoing cardiac and non-cardiac surgery. Nevertheless, publication bias and heterogeneity reduces the confidence of the finding. Although the analysis was probably under-powered for some outcomes, no difference in the incidence of serious adverse events was observed with ESA and iron compared with iron alone. Further large prospective trials are required to confirm these findings.

Universal tranexamic acid therapy to minimize transfusion for major joint arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis of protocol implementation.

PURPOSE: Tranexamic acid (TXA) therapy can reduce red blood cell (RBC) transfusion; however, this therapy remains underutilized in many surgical patient populations. We assessed whether implementation of a protocol to facilitate universal administration of TXA in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty would reduce the incidence of RBC transfusion without increasing adverse clinical outcomes. METHODS: We implemented a quality of care policy to provide universal administration of intravenous TXA at a dose of 20 mg·kg(-1) iv to all eligible patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty from October 21, 2013 to April 30, 2014. We compared data from an equal number of patients before and after protocol implementation (n = 422 per group). The primary outcome was RBC transfusion with secondary outcomes including postoperative hemoglobin concentration (Hb) and length of hospital stay. Adverse events were identified from the electronic medical records. Data were analyzed by a Chi square test and adjusted logistic and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Implementation of the protocol resulted in an increase in TXA utilization from 45.8% to 95.3% [change 49.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 44.1 to 54.5; P < 0.001]. This change was associated with a reduction in the rate of RBC transfusion from 8.8% to 5.2%, (change -3.6%; 95% CI, -0.1 to -7.0; P = 0.043). Pre- and post-protocol mean [standard deviation (SD)] Hb values were similar, including the nadir Hb prior to RBC transfusion [72 (8) g·L(-1) vs 70 (8) g·L(-1), respectively; mean difference -1 g·L(-1); 95% CI, -3 to 5; P = 0.569]. Length of stay was not altered, and no increase in adverse events was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a perioperative TXA protocol was associated with both an increase in TXA use and a reduction in RBC transfusion following hip or knee arthroplasty. Adverse events and length of hospital stay were not influenced by the protocol.