ABSTRACT
In the present study, a total of 7793 samples from 5 different types of hosts were collected and tested, with a seroprevalence of 2.4% (184/7793). Although the seroprevalence of human and animal brucellosis is relatively low, numbers of human brucellosis cases reported have increased continuously from 2004 to 2018. A total of 118 Brucella strains containing 4 biotypes were obtained, including Brucella melitensis bv.1 (n = 8) and bv.3 (n = 106), Brucella abortus bv.3 (n = 3) and bv.7 (n = 1). Twenty-one shared MLVA-16 genotypes, each composed of 2 to 19 strains obtained from different hosts, suggest the occurrence of a brucellosis outbreak epidemic with multiple source points and laboratory infection events. Moreover, 30 shared MLVA-16 genotypes were observed among 59.6% (68/114) B. melitensis isolates from Zhejiang and strains from other 21 different provinces, especially northern provinces, China. The analysis highlighted the imported nature of the strains from all over the northern provinces with a dominant part from the developed areas of animal husbandry. These data revealed a potential transmission pattern of brucellosis in this region, due to introduced infected sheep leading to a brucellosis outbreak epidemic, and eventually causing multiple laboratory infection events. It is urgent to strengthen the inspection and quarantine of the introduced animals.
Subject(s)
Brucella/classification , Brucellosis/epidemiology , Brucellosis/transmission , Laboratory Infection/microbiology , Sheep/microbiology , Animals , Bacterial Typing Techniques , Brucella abortus/genetics , Brucella melitensis/genetics , China/epidemiology , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Disease Outbreaks , Genetic Variation , Genotype , Humans , Minisatellite Repeats , Multilocus Sequence Typing , Phylogeny , Seroepidemiologic StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To explore an economical and efficient molluscicidal method suitable for large area of nursery stock field. METHODS: Two nursery stock fields with Oncomelania hupensis were selected as experimental sites, and an experimental group and a control group were set. In the experimental group, the molluscacide and herbicide were alternately used (a purification molluscicidal method) during the period of May to October, 2011. In the control group, grass shoveling and soil burying combined with molluscacide were used in the same period. The snail control effects of the two groups were observed and the costs of the two methods were analyzed. RESULTS: No living snails were found in both experimental and control groups three consecutive years after the snail control intervention above mentioned. The costs of snail control intervention in the experimental group and control group were 0.90 and 1.80 Yuan/m2, respectively. CONCLUSION: The effect of the purification molluscicidal method in nursery stock field is satisfying, and the cost is lower.
