Predicting Trainee Clinical Success From Performance at Simulated Endotracheal Intubation.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple attempts and failure at endotracheal intubation (ETI) are common for inexperienced practitioners and can cause patient morbidity. A test to predict a provider's likelihood of success at patient ETI could assist decisions about training. This project investigated whether trainees' performance at laryngoscopy on airway mannequins predicted their laryngoscopy outcomes in patients. METHODS: Twenty-one consenting first-year anesthesiology residents, emergency medicine residents, and medical students enrolled in this prospective, observational study. They performed laryngoscopy and ETI with a curved laryngoscope on 4 airway mannequins. Metrics included peak dental force, procedure duration, esophageal intubation, laryngeal view, and first-pass ETI success on the mannequins. Trainee data from 203 patient ETIs were collected over a roughly 2-month period centered around the simulation test. Multivariable logistic regression analyzed the relationship of mannequin metrics, participant experience, and a patient difficult airway score with trainee ETI outcomes in patients. RESULTS: Median trainee first-pass success rate at patient ETI was 63%, the rate of ETI problems was 16%, and the esophageal intubation rate was 6%. Laryngoscopy peak dental force, first-pass ETI success, and duration on individual mannequins were significant predictors of patient ETI first-pass success. Metrics from 2 of the 4 mannequins predicted ETI problems. DISCUSSION: Performance metrics from simulated laryngoscopy predicted trainee outcomes during patient ETI. First-pass success and ETI problems affect patient safety and are related to trainee skill. Mannequin laryngoscopy tests could identify trainees who would benefit from additional practice. The metrics could be surrogate end points in research to optimize simulated laryngoscopy training.

Assessing the domino effect: Female physician industry payments fall short, parallel gender inequalities in medicine.

BACKGROUND: Physician-industry relationships have been complex in modern medicine. Since large proportions of research, education and consulting are industry-backed, this is an important area to consider when examining gender inequality in medicine. METHODS: The Open Payments Program (OPP) database from August 2013 to December 2016 was analyzed. In order to identify physicians' genders, the OPP was matched with the National Provider Index dataset. Descriptive statistics of payments to female compared to male surgeons were obtained and stratified by payment type, subspecialty, geographic location and year. RESULTS: 3,925,707 transactions to 136,845 physicians were analyzed. Of them, 31,297 physicians were surgeons with an average payment per provider of $131,252 to male surgeons compared to $62,101 to female surgeons. Significantly fewer women received consultant, royalty/licensure, ownership and speaker payments. However, women received a higher average amount per surgeon compared to their male counterparts within research payments. Overall payments to women trended upwards over time. CONCLUSION: Gender inequality still exists in medicine, and in industry-physician payments. Industry should increasingly consider engaging women in consultancies, speaking engagements, and research.

Opioid prescribing practices in patients undergoing surgery for oral cavity cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Opioids have been overprescribed after general and orthopedic surgeries, but prescribing patterns have not been reported for head and neck surgery. The objectives of this retrospective review are to describe postoperative opioid prescriptions after oral cancer surgery and determine which patients receive higher amounts. METHODS: A single institution retrospective review was performed for 81 adults with oral cavity tumors undergoing surgery. Opioid prescriptions upon discharge were reported in daily oral morphine equivalents (OME). High opioids were defined as > 90 mg daily and > 200 mg total, commensurate with U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention and state guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to investigate factors associated with high opioids. RESULTS: The median number of doses dispensed was 30 (interquartile range [IQR] 30-45; range 3-120). The median daily dose was 30 mg (IQR 20-45 mg; range 15-240 mg). Five patients (6%) received higher than the recommended daily dose. The median total dispensed amount was 225 mg (IQR 150-250 mg; range 15-1200 mg). Fifty-one (63%) received greater than the recommended total dose. On multivariable logistic regression, advanced tumor stage (odds ratio [OR] 11.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-109.4; P = 0.034) and inpatient pain scores (OR 1.3 per 1-unit increase; 95% CI 1.0-1.7; P = 0.039) were associated with receiving high total opioids after surgery. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients received greater than the recommended 200 mg total OME. Advanced stage and higher inpatient pain scores were associated with receiving more opioids for discharge. Consensus-driven analgesic plans are needed to reduce excess opioids after discharge following head and neck surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:2361-2366, 2018.

Positive Surgical Margins in the 10 Most Common Solid Cancers.

A positive surgical margin (PSM) following cancer resection oftentimes necessitates adjuvant treatments and carries significant financial and prognostic implications. We sought to compare PSM rates for the ten most common solid cancers in the United States, and to assess trends over time. Over 10 million patients were identified in the National Cancer Data Base from 1998-2012, and 6.5 million had surgical margin data. PSM rates were compared between two time periods, 1998-2002 and 2008-2012. PSM was positively correlated with tumor category and grade. Ovarian and prostate cancers had the highest PSM prevalence in women and men, respectively. The highest PSM rates for cancers affecting both genders were seen for oral cavity tumors. PSM rates for breast cancer and lung and bronchus cancer in both men and women declined over the study period. PSM increases were seen for bladder, colon and rectum, and kidney and renal pelvis cancers. This large-scale analysis appraises the magnitude of PSM in the United States in order to focus future efforts on improving oncologic surgical care with the goal of optimizing value and improving patient outcomes.

Health-Related Quality-of-Life Instruments for Pediatric Patients with Diverse Facial Deformities: A Systematic Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Treatment for patients with diverse craniofacial conditions is complex and long-term. Craniofacial conditions profoundly influence health-related quality of life, and patient- and parent-reported outcomes provide a critical and complementary perspective on the multidisciplinary treatment of patients. However, little is known regarding the health-related quality of life among children with diverse craniofacial conditions. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature regarding patient- and parent-reported outcomes measures for patients with diverse craniofacial conditions. METHODS: Articles from the PubMed, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Embase/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases that used patient- and/or parent-reported outcome instruments in patients with diverse craniofacial conditions were reviewed. Diagnoses included were cleft lip and/or palate, craniosynostosis, microtia, craniofacial microsomia, facial vascular malformations, and congenital nevi across pediatric populations (0 to 22 years of age). RESULTS: Six hundred ninety articles were identified, and 155 were selected for inclusion. One hundred twenty different health-related quality-of-life tools were used to analyze factors such as physical, psychological, or social function. Of these, the 10 most common psychometrically tested tools were identified in 59 studies. Five tools had both parent and patient versions. Two tools were developed and validated for patients with diverse craniofacial conditions, but neither was developed for nonadolescent children. CONCLUSIONS: Many parent- and patient-reported instruments are used to measure varying health-related quality of life factors in this population, but no tool exists that was developed and psychometrically tested in different facial deformities that measures comprehensive health-related quality of life issues across all pediatric ages. This study will guide the development of new tools to measure the parent and patient health-related quality-of-life perspective in patients with diverse craniofacial conditions.

A qualitative analysis of identity and goals in patients with deformities: preparation for an evidence-based advocacy for a vulnerable population.

INTRODUCTION: Economically and socially vulnerable patients with deformities are likely to live a marginalized life, reducing their quality of life and societal participation. An evidence-based approach is needed for these patients who may not be able to advocate for themselves. The objective of this study is to identify important aspects of the perceived identity of adult patients with deformities. METHODS: This retrospective qualitative analysis is of applicant responses to an intake questionnaire for Fresh Start Surgical Gifts, a charitable reconstructive surgery organization serving children and adults with deformities. Five open-ended questions were analyzed and grouped into 2 broad categories: Identity and Goals. Keywords were identified by an online survey website and subjective judgment of the investigators. Keywords were then combined into broader themes. RESULTS: Seventy respondents with a mean age of 24.79 (median 23) between 1992 and 2011 were analyzed. Social and professional issues were the most frequently occurring themes among Identity and Goals questions. CONCLUSION: The current identity of patients with deformities centers on social aspects of their lives, rather than a career or profession, yet they do hold both professional and social aspirations. This research will guide the development of an objective tool to measure patient-reported impact and outcomes of reconstructive plastic surgery.