Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin with basal-plus insulin regimen versus insulin alone in non-critically ill hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes: SITA-PLUS hospital trial.

AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of basal-plus (BP) insulin regimen with or without sitagliptin in non-critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: This open-label, randomized clinical trial included inpatients with a previous diagnosis of T2D and blood glucose (BG) between 180 and 400 mg/dL. Participants received basal and correctional insulin doses (BP regimen) either with or without sitagliptin. The primary outcome was the difference in the mean daily BG among the groups. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients (mean age 60 years, 64 % men) were randomized. Compared with BP insulin therapy alone, the sitagliptin-BP combination led to a lower mean daily BG (158.8 vs 175.0 mg/dL, P = 0.014), a higher percentage of readings within a BG range of 70-180 mg/dL (75.9 % vs 64.7 %, P < 0.001), and a lower number of BG readings >180 mg/dL (P < 0.001). Sitagliptin-BP resulted in fewer basal and supplementary insulin doses (P = 0.024 and P = 0.017, respectively) and lower daily insulin injections (P = 0.023) than those with insulin alone. The proportion of patients with hypoglycemia was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: For inpatients with T2D and hyperglycemia, the sitagliptin and BP regimen combination is safe and more effective than insulin therapy alone. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT05579119.

Relationship of ghrelin, acid uric and proinflammatory adipocytokines in different degrees of obesity or diabetes.

We compared and examined factors associated with ghrelin and uric acid in obese subjects (OB), obese plus type 2 diabetes mellitus (OBDM) and healthy controls (C). Methods. We analyzed blood count, renal function, liver enzymes, lipids, resistin, leptin, IL-6, uric acid and ghrelin in OB, OBDM and C. We included 76 subjects with different body mass index (BMI): 36 C (24 ± 3), 11 OB<40 (30-39.9), 20 OB>40 (40-60), and 9 OBDM (45.9 ± 9). Results. Metabolic profile was as follows: HOMA-IR 4.7 ± 3 and 5 ± 3 vs 2 ± 1 (p < 0.01), resistin 8.7 ± 2 and 9.4 ± 2 vs 5.4 ± 2 ng/mL (p < 0.001), leptin 6.2 ± 3.9 and 5.3 ± 2 vs 3.6 ± 1.8 ng/mL (p = 0.001) and IL-6 197.5 ± 78.9 and 223.6 ± 115 vs 7.4 ± 8.3 pg/mL (p = 0.001) in OB and OBDM vs C, respectively. Ghrelin was higher in OB<40 compared to C (1780 ± 197 vs 1465 ± 12 pg/mL, p < 0.05), and lower in OBDM (987.4 ± 114 pg/mL, p < 0.05). BMI showed a positive correlation with resistin (p < 0.001); leptin (p = 0.004), IL-6 (p = 0.001), uric acid (p = 0.0005) and negative with ghrelin (r = -0.431, p = 0.028). Resistin was directly correlated with leptin (p < 0.001) and inversely correlated with renal function (p = 0.03). Conclusion. Severe obesity and obesity-associated diabetes affected ghrelin and uric acid levels. This may well be associated with proinflammatory adipocytokines, insulin resistance, liver enzymes or renal function.

[Usefulness of cabergoline in patients with prolactinemia and resistant or intolerant to bromocriptine]. / Utilidad de la cabergolina en pacientes portadores de prolactinoma resistentes o intolerantes a bromocriptina.

BACKGROUND: Dopaminergic agonists are the treatment of choice for prolactinomas with bromocriptine (BCE) being the primary agent used. There is a group of patients who are not responders to such therapy or have severe side effects (resistant or intolerant to BCE, respectively). We undertook this study to evaluate the response to the administration of cabergoline (CBG) in patients intolerant or resistant to BCE. METHODS: Twenty seven patients (25 females and 2 males) were recruited with prolactin-pituitary tumors, obtaining basal serum prolactin (PRL) samples and again each month up to 3 months. We recorded signs associated with hyperprolactinemia and secondary effects of CBG. The initial dose was 0.25 mg twice weekly during the first week, with an increase to 0.5 mg twice weekly from the second week until the conclusion of the study. Statistical analysis included Shapiro-Wilk, Kruskal-Wallis and ANOVA tests. RESULTS: Twenty two patients had microadenomas and five had macroadenomas. In the intolerant group (n= 11), the initial PRL value (61.45 +/- 19.82) decreased by the third month to 4.94 +/- 1.79 (p<0.024). In the resistant group (n= 16), basal PRL values were 119.53 +/- 11.52. In 15 of these patients, the PRL value significantly decreased to 12.95 +/- 3.66 ng/ml (p<0.005) by the third month of treatment. In both groups the signs related to hyperprolactinemia significantly improved, with a low incidence of secondary effects due to CBG. CONCLUSIONS: CBG is useful in most patients considered as intolerant or resistant to BCE.

Utilidad de la cabergolina en pacientes portadores de prolactinoma resistentes o intolerantes a bromocriptina / Usefulness of cabergoline in patients with prolactinemia and resistant or intolerant to bromocriptine

Introducción: La terapia de elección de los prolactinomas son los agonistas dopaminérgicos, cuyo principal exponente es la bromocriptina, sin embargo, hay pacientes que no responden o presentan severos efectos secundarios (resistentes o intolerantes a bromocriptina, respectivamente). El objetivo en este estudio fue valorar la respuesta al uso de cabergolina en pacientes con prolactinomas, intolerantes o resistentes a bromocriptina Material y métodos: Se estudiaron 27 pacientes (25 mujeres y dos varones) en quienes se realizó determinación basal de prolactina y cada mes hasta completar tres meses, registrando los datos asociados a hiperprolactinemia y los efectos secundarios. La dosis inicial fue de 0.25 mg los lunes y jueves durante la primera semana, y 0.5 mg a partir de la segunda. El análisis estadístico incluyó la prueba de Shapiro-Wilk, Kruskal-Wallis y Anova. Resultados: 22 pacientes presentaron microadenomas y cinco macroadenomas. En los intolerantes (n = 11) el valor inicial de prolactina de 61.45 ± 19.82 disminuyó al tercer mes a 4.94 ± 1.79 (p < 0.024). En los resistentes (n = 16), el valor basal fue 119.53 ± 11.52; 15 pacientes redujeron significativamente a 12.95 ± 3.66 (p < 0.005) al tercer mes de tratamiento. En ambos, los signos atribuibles a la hiperprolactinemia mejoraron significativamente, con poca incidencia de efectos secundarios. Conclusiones: La cabergolina es útil en la mayoría de los pacientes considerados intolerantes o resistentes a la bromocriptina.

BACKGROUND: Dopaminergic agonists are the treatment of choice for prolactinomas with bromocriptine (BCE) being the primary agent used. There is a group of patients who are not responders to such therapy or have severe side effects (resistant or intolerant to BCE, respectively). We undertook this study to evaluate the response to the administration of cabergoline (CBG) in patients intolerant or resistant to BCE. METHODS: Twenty seven patients (25 females and 2 males) were recruited with prolactin-pituitary tumors, obtaining basal serum prolactin (PRL) samples and again each month up to 3 months. We recorded signs associated with hyperprolactinemia and secondary effects of CBG. The initial dose was 0.25 mg twice weekly during the first week, with an increase to 0.5 mg twice weekly from the second week until the conclusion of the study. Statistical analysis included Shapiro-Wilk, Kruskal-Wallis and ANOVA tests. RESULTS: Twenty two patients had microadenomas and five had macroadenomas. In the intolerant group (n= 11), the initial PRL value (61.45 +/- 19.82) decreased by the third month to 4.94 +/- 1.79 (p<0.024). In the resistant group (n= 16), basal PRL values were 119.53 +/- 11.52. In 15 of these patients, the PRL value significantly decreased to 12.95 +/- 3.66 ng/ml (p<0.005) by the third month of treatment. In both groups the signs related to hyperprolactinemia significantly improved, with a low incidence of secondary effects due to CBG. CONCLUSIONS: CBG is useful in most patients considered as intolerant or resistant to BCE.