Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Ear Hear ; 42(3): 606-614, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33055579

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the cognitive evolution of older adults with severe or profound hearing impairment after cochlear implantation with that of a matched group of older adults with severe hearing impairment who do not receive a cochlear implant (CI). DESIGN: In this prospective, longitudinal, controlled, and multicenter study, 24 older CI users were included in the intervention group and 24 adults without a CI in the control group. The control group matched the intervention group in terms of gender, age, formal education, cognitive functioning, and residual hearing. Assessments were made at baseline and 14 months later. Primary outcome measurements included the change in the total score on the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status for Hearing impaired individuals score and on its subdomain score to assess cognitive evolution in both groups. Secondary outcome measurements included self-reported changes in sound quality (Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index), self-perceived hearing disability (Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale), states of anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and level of negative affectivity and social inhibition (Type D questionnaire). RESULTS: Improvements of the overall cognitive functioning (p = 0.05) and the subdomain "Attention" (p = 0.02) were observed after cochlear implantation in the intervention group; their scores were compared to the corresponding scores in the control group. Significant positive effects of cochlear implantation on sound quality and self-perceived hearing outcomes were found in the intervention group. Notably, 20% fewer traits of Type D personalities were measured in the intervention group after cochlear implantation. In the control group, traits of Type D personalities increased by 13%. CONCLUSION: Intervention with a CI improved cognitive functioning (domain Attention in particular) in older adults with severe hearing impairment compared to that of the matched controls with hearing impairment without a CI. However, older CI users did not, in terms of cognition, bridge the performance gap with adults with normal hearing after 1 year of CI use. The fact that experienced, older CI users still present subnormal cognitive functioning may highlight the need for additional cognitive rehabilitation in the long term after implantation.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Hearing Loss , Speech Perception , Aged , Cognition , Hearing Loss/surgery , Humans , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome
2.
Cochlear Implants Int ; 17(6): 276-282, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27808008

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The diagnosis of non-organic hearing loss (NOHL) is a difficult but important issue during the assessment process for cochlear implantation (CI). We aim to identify the key factors in identifying patients with NOHL during CI assessment and present our local screening protocol for NOHL. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients referred to the Yorkshire Auditory Implant Service (YAIS) between 2003 and 2015 who were subsequently diagnosed with NOHL during the assessment. Patient demographic data, audiological and functional assessments were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were included in the study. Mean age was 43 years (range 14-82 years). Male to female ratio was 1:1.7. Indicators of possible NOHL included a sudden deterioration in hearing (n = 21; 66%), mismatches in observed behaviour and either pure-tone audiogram (PTA) (n = 27; 84%) or functional testing (n = 20; 80%) and stapedial reflexes below reported audiological thresholds (n = 12; 46%). A mismatch in functional hearing and PTA was seen in 72% of patients. Patients with suspected NOHL were referred for further objective testing. All 23 patients who underwent objective testing had better hearing levels compared to reported hearing thresholds thus placing them outside of implant criteria. Five candidates were found to have normal hearing thresholds. DISCUSSION: NOHL can present a significant challenge to the implant team, particularly in the subgroup with a pre-existing organic hearing loss with non-organic overlay. We discuss the common features in this cohort of patients. CONCLUSIONS: To facilitate the identification of patients with NOHL, the YAIS has developed a screening protocol.


Subject(s)
Audiometry, Pure-Tone/statistics & numerical data , Cochlear Implantation , Hearing Loss, Functional/diagnosis , Patient Selection , Symptom Assessment/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Auditory Threshold , Female , Hearing Loss, Functional/physiopathology , Hearing Loss, Functional/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Preoperative Period , Reference Values , Retrospective Studies , Stapes/physiopathology , Symptom Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
3.
Cochlear Implants Int ; 17 Suppl 1: 17-21, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27099105

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Adult cochlear implant (CI) candidacy is assessed in part by the use of speech perception measures. In the United Kingdom the current cut-off point to fall within the CI candidacy range is a score of less than 50% on the BKB sentences presented in quiet (presented at 70 dBSPL). GOAL: The specific goal of this article was to review the benefit of adding the AB word test to the assessment test battery for candidacy. RESULTS: The AB word test scores showed good sensitivity and specificity when calculated based on both word and phoneme scores. The word score equivalent for 50% correct on the BKB sentences was 18.5% and it was 34.5% when the phoneme score was calculated; these scores are in line with those used in centres in Wales (15% AB word score). CONCLUSION: The goal of the British Cochlear Implant Group (BCIG) service evaluation was to determine if the pre-implant assessment measures are appropriate and set at the correct level for determining candidacy, the future analyses will determine whether the speech perception cut-off point for candidacy should be adjusted and whether other more challenging measures should be used in the candidacy evaluation.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/methods , Deafness/diagnosis , Patient Selection , Speech Discrimination Tests/methods , Speech Reception Threshold Test/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cochlear Implants , Deafness/physiopathology , Deafness/surgery , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Speech Discrimination Tests/standards , Speech Perception , Speech Reception Threshold Test/standards , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom , Young Adult
4.
Cochlear Implants Int ; 12(3): 173-6, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21917206

ABSTRACT

Acute loss of vision accompanied by profound loss of hearing is fortunately rare, but has a catastrophic effect on both the patient and their family. Re-establishing communication and spatial awareness are high priorities. We describe the case of a 45 year-old man who presented as a result of poisoning by ethylene glycol. Following assessment by clinicians who learned the deaf-blind alphabet in order to communicate, he had his hearing successfully rehabilitated with simultaneous bilateral cochlear implants. The patient recovered the ability to understand speech near perfectly in quiet, to attend to the ear giving the clearer signal in noise, and to localise sources of sound. The patient reported that the latter skill facilitated mobility. This is the first reported case of a patient with acute dual sensory loss due to ethylene glycol poisoning benefiting from bilateral cochlear implants.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/rehabilitation , Ethylene Glycol/poisoning , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/chemically induced , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/rehabilitation , Crime Victims/rehabilitation , Deaf-Blind Disorders/chemically induced , Deaf-Blind Disorders/rehabilitation , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/chemically induced , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/rehabilitation , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
5.
Int J Audiol ; 49(5): 347-56, 2010 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20380610

ABSTRACT

Cochlear implantation is effective at restoring partial hearing to profoundly deaf adults, but not all patients receive equal benefit. The present study evaluated the effectiveness of a computer-based self-administered training package that was designed to improve speech perception among adults who had used cochlear implants for more than three years. Eleven adults were asked to complete an hour of auditory training each day, five days a week, for a period of three weeks. Two training tasks were included, one based around discriminating isolated words, and the other around discriminating words in sentences. Compliance with the protocol was good, with eight out of eleven participants completing approximately 15 hours of training, as instructed. A significant improvement of eight percentage points was found on a test of consonant discrimination, but there were no significant improvements on sentence tests or on a test of vowel discrimination. Self-reported benefits were variable and generally small. Further research is needed to establish whether auditory training is particularly effective for identifiable sub-groups of cochlear-implant users.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Computer-Assisted Instruction/methods , Patient Education as Topic , Speech Perception , Adult , Aged , Cochlear Implantation , Female , Hearing Loss/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance , Speech Discrimination Tests , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...