Community-Based Palliative Care and Advance Care Planning Documentation: Evidence from a Multispecialty Group.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: With the growing public demand for access to critical health data across care settings, it is essential that advance care planning (ACP) information be included in the electronic health record (EHR) so that multiple clinicians can access it and understand individuals' preferences for end-of-life care. Community-based palliative care programs often incorporate ACP services. This study examined whether a community-based palliative care program is associated with digitally extractable ACP documentation in the EHR. DESIGN: Observational study using propensity score-weighted generalized estimation equations to examine patterns of digitally extractable ACP documentation. SETTING: Palo Alto Medical Foundation (PAMF), a multispecialty ambulatory healthcare system in northern California. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals aged 65 and older with serious illnesses between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2014 (N = 3,444). INTERVENTION: Community-based palliative care program in PAMF. MEASUREMENTS: Digitally extractable ACP in EHR. RESULTS: We found that only 14% (n = 483) of individuals with serious illnesses had digitally extractable ACP in electronic health records. Of the 6% of individuals receiving palliative care, 65% had ACP, versus 11% of those not receiving palliative care. Study results showed a strong positive association between palliative care and ACP. CONCLUSION: Only a small percentage of individuals with serious illnesses had ACP documentation in the EHR. Individuals with serious illnesses infrequently used palliative care delivered by board-certified palliative care specialists. Palliative care service use was associated with higher rates of ACP after controlling for organizational and individual characteristics using a propensity score weighting method. Scalable interventions targeted at non-palliative care clinicians for universal access to ACP are needed.

Provider Perspectives on Advance Care Planning Documentation in the Electronic Health Record: The Experience of Primary Care Providers and Specialists Using Advance Health-Care Directives and Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment.

CONTEXT: Advance care planning (ACP) is valued by patients and clinicians, yet documenting ACP in an accessible manner is problematic. OBJECTIVES: In order to understand how providers incorporate electronic health record (EHR) ACP documentation into clinical practice, we interviewed providers in primary care and specialty departments about ACP practices (n = 13) and analyzed EHR data on 358 primary care providers (PCPs) and 79 specialists at a large multispecialty group practice. METHODS: Structured interviews were conducted with 13 providers with high and low rates of ACP documentation in primary care, oncology, pulmonology, and cardiology departments. The EHR problem list data on Advance Health Care Directives (AHCDs) and Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) were used to calculate ACP documentation rates. RESULTS: Examining seriously ill patients ≥65 years with no preexisting ACP documentation seen by providers during 2013 to 2014, 88.6% (AHCD) and 91.1% (POLST) of 79 specialists had zero ACP documentations. Of 358 PCPs, 29.1% (AHCD) and 62.3% (POLST) had zero ACP documentations. Interviewed PCPs often believed ACP documentation was beneficial and accessible, while specialists more often did not. Specialists expressed more confusion about documenting ACP, whereas PCPs reported standard clinic workflows. Problems with interoperability between outpatient and inpatient EHR systems and lack of consensus about who should document ACP were sources of variations in practices. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that providers desire standardized workflows for ACP discussion and documentation. New Medicare reimbursement for ACP and an increasing number of quality metrics for ACP are incentives for health-care systems to address barriers to ACP documentation.

Multiple locations of advance care planning documentation in an electronic health record: are they easy to find?

BACKGROUND: The ambulatory care setting is a new frontier for advance care planning (ACP). While electronic health records (EHR) have been expected to make ACP documentation more retrievable, the literature is silent on the locations of ACP documentation in EHRs and how readily they can be found. OBJECTIVE: The study's objective is to identify the locations of ACP documentation in EpicCare EHR and to determine which patient and primary care provider (PCP) characteristics are associated with having a scanned ACP document. A scanned document (SD) is the only documentation containing signatures (unsigned documents are not legally valid). DESIGN: The study design is a retrospective review of EpicCare EHR records. The search of terms included advance directives, living will, Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatments (POLST), power of attorney, and do-not-resuscitate. SETTING/SUBJECTS: Subjects were patients in a multispecialty practice in California age 65 or older who had at least one ACP documentation in the EHR. MEASUREMENTS: Measurements were types and locations of documentation, and characteristics of patients and physicians. RESULTS: About 50.9% of patients age 65 or older had at least one ACP documentation in the EHR (n=60,105). About 33.5% of patients with ACP documentation (n=30,566) had an SD. Patients' age, gender, race, illnesses, and when their physician started at the medical group were statistically significantly associated with the probability of having a scanned ACP document. CONCLUSIONS: Only 33.5% of patients with ACP documentation somewhere in the EHR had an SD. Standardizing the location of these documents should become a priority to improve care. Actions are needed to eliminate disparities.