Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Arthroplasty ; 21(6 Suppl 2): 98-107, 2006 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16950070

ABSTRACT

The goal of this report is to review reoperations undertaken on the initial 221 unicompartmental arthroplasties performed using a minimally invasive technique. A comparison was then performed between these cases and the previous 514 open medial unicompartmental arthroplasties performed at our institution. In the minimally invasive group, 9 (4.1%) of 221 knees were revised (8 for component loosening, 1 for deep infection). Of 212 unrevised knees, 16 have required a total of 18 nonrevision reoperations. Overall, 25 of 221 knees required at least 1 reoperation (total reoperation rate, 11.3%). Despite an accelerated recovery and decreased hospital stay in our minimally invasive unicompartmental arthroplasties, the rate of revision due to aseptic loosening (3.7% vs 1.0%) and the overall reoperation rate (11.3% vs 8.6%) compare unfavorably with those performed with an open technique.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Prosthesis Failure , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Female , Humans , Knee Joint/diagnostic imaging , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Radiography , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...