In vitro and in vivo biologic effects of Ospemifene (FC-1271a) in breast cancer.

Ospemifene (FC-1271a) is a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator under development for osteoporosis prevention. In the present paper, we examine both the in vitro and in vivo effects of FC-1271a in breast cancer models. In vitro, the growth inhibitory effects of FC-1271a and its main metabolite are investigated in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells at doses ranging from 0.1 to 10 microM. Modulation of pS2 expression, an indicator of estrogen activity, was also examined in all experiments using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. In vivo, the effects of treatment with 10, 25, 50, or 100 mg/kg FC-1271a on MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 human tumor xenografts in athymic, ovariectomized mice were determined. For MCF-7 cells, FC-1271a and its main metabolite, toremifene VI (TOR VI) displayed anti-estrogenic effects in vitro as shown through growth inhibition and decreased expression of pS2. Treatment with FC-1271a in vivo inhibited MCF-7 tumor growth, compared with control (P< or =0.05). FC-1271a and TOR VI did not inhibit the growth of MDA-MB-231 cells in vitro, and no clear effects of FC-1271a treatment were seen on MDA-MB-231 tumor growth in vivo. In conclusion, FC-1271a appears to exert anti-estrogenic effects dependent on estrogen receptor positivity in vitro and in vivo on the growth of MCF-7 cells.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of toremifene.

Toremifene is a chlorinated triphenylethylene derivative of tamoxifen approved for use in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Toremifene is well tolerated in patients, and common adverse effects of this drug include vasomotor symptoms such as hot flashes and vaginal discharge. This compound is administered to patients orally at a dose of 60 mg/day, although alternative methods of administration have been investigated. Oral bioavailability is estimated to be approximately 100%. At steady state, toremifene and its metabolites are highly protein bound (>95%). Toremifene is metabolised in the liver by cytochrome P450 enzymes, and it is eliminated primarily in the faeces following enterohepatic circulation. The half-life of toremifene is approximately 5 days, and steady state is reached by 6 weeks depending on the dose given. The pharmacokinetics of toremifene have been shown to be altered by certain liver conditions, but age and kidney function do not appear to be as significant.

Pharmacokinetics of (deaminohydroxy)toremifene in humans: a new, selective estrogen-receptor modulator.

PURPOSE: New selective estrogen-receptor modulators for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease and breast cancer are currently the focus of intense research. (Deaminohydroxy)toremifene (Z-2-[4-(4-chloro- 1,2-diphenyl-but-1-enyl)phenoxy]ethanol; FC-1271a) has been shown to prevent bone resorption in rats while having no or weak estrogen-like effects on the uterus, which makes it a good candidate drug for osteoporosis prevention. Our purpose here was to examine the pharmacokinetics of (deaminohydroxy)toremifene in humans included in two phase-I studies. METHODS: The first was a single-dose, dose-escalation study with 28 healthy male volunteers. Doses ranged from 10 mg to 800 mg. The second study was conducted during a 12-week period with 40 healthy, post-menopausal women, who received repeated oral doses of 25-200 mg. Standard pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed. RESULTS: In the single-dose study, time to reach peak concentration (tmax) ranged from 1.3 h to 4.0 h; peak concentration (Cmax) ranged from 15 ng/ml to 445 ng/ ml; and the estimated terminal elimination half-life (mean +/- SD; t1/2) was 24.8 +/- 7.0 h. In the repeated-dose study, tmax ranged from 1.9 h to 2.6 h at 6 weeks and from 2.5 h to 2.9 h at 12 weeks. Cmax ranged from 295 ng/ml to 1,043 ng/ml at 6 weeks and from 25 ng/ml to 1211 ng/ml at 12 weeks. The average t1/2 at all dose levels was 29.7 +/- 1.5 h (overall mean +/- SD). Strong linear correlations between the dose and Cmax and between the dose and the area under the curve were observed in both studies. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that (deaminohydroxy)toremifene has pharmacokinetics suitable for single daily dosing. The prophylactic use of this agent in women susceptible to development of osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease and breast cancer could, therefore, be tested using a once-daily dosing schedule similar to those of other hormone-replacement therapy regimens.

Genotoxic effects of the novel mixed antiestrogen FC-1271a in comparison to tamoxifen and toremifene.

Tamoxifen has been used for the treatment of breast cancer since the 1970s, but is considered a carcinogen because it has been linked to liver cancer in rats and an increased risk of endometrial cancer in patients. In rats, DNA adducts appear to be responsible for carcinogenesis, but their contribution to carcinogenesis in humans is not clear. FC-1271a and toremifene are mixed antiestrogens similar to tamoxifen. In order to compare the genotoxicity of these different triphenylethylenes, we treated mice for 28 days with 50 mg/kg of either tamoxifen, toremifene, FC- 1271 a or vehicle control. DNA from liver and uterus was assayed by standard 32P-postlabeling and thin layer chromatography for the presence of DNA adducts. Two methods of drug administration (oral and subcutaneous) and two strains of mice were compared and the plasma and tissue concentrations of the drugs and three metabolites of tamoxifen and toremifene were determined. Regardless of the conditions, only tamoxifen-treated mice showed DNA adducts in the liver. Adduct levels did not correlate with drug or metabolite levels and adducts were present even when drug was not detectable. Mice were also treated orally with either 50, 100, or 200 mg/kg of drug for 7 days. Again, adducts were found only in liver tissue of mice treated with tamoxifen, and adduct levels were dose-dependent. In conclusion, the chlorinated triphenylethylene FC-1271a did not cause DNA adducts under various conditions in mice, suggesting a low carcinogenic potential.

Quantitative analysis of Z-2-[4-(4-chloro-1,2-diphenyl-but-1-enyl)phenoxy]ethanol in human plasma using high-performance liquid chromatography.

A highly sensitive and precise high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) assay was developed and validated for the quantitation of Z-2-[4-(4-chloro-1,2-diphenyl-but-1-enyl) phenoxy]ethanol (FC-1271a) in human plasma. Plasma samples (1.0 ml) containing FC-1271a and internal standard (toremifene citrate; Farestono) were extracted using a 2% 1-butanol, 98% hexane solution with an extraction efficiency of >97%. Samples were reconstituted in methanol, irradiated with high intensity ultraviolet light (254 nm) for 1 min, and injected onto a C18 reverse phase column. Samples were eluted isocratically at a flow-rate of 0.5 ml/min with a mobile phase consisting of 6.5% water and 0.5% triethylamine in methanol. The fluorescence of photochemically activated compounds was detected using a fluorometer set at an excitation wavelength of 266 nm and emission wavelength of 370 nm. Under these assay conditions, standard calibration curves were linear through a concentration range of 10-400 ng/ml. In summary, we have developed and validated an HPLC assay to quantitate FC-1271a in human plasma.

Hormone replacement therapy and breast cancer: revisiting the issues.

OBJECTIVE: To assess current ideas about the benefits and risks of estrogen and hormone replacement therapy (ERT/HRT) in postmenopausal women. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE searches, supplemented by various texts, of the literature on HRT, ERT, and selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs): tamoxifen, toremifene, and raloxifene. DATA SYNTHESIS: HRT is primarily used for improving quality of life in women suffering from vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause. HRT is beneficial in postmenopausal women for preventing cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, and Alzheimer's disease. Review of meta-analyses of clinical trials showed that ERT/HRT ever-users (patients who have ever used ERT/HRT) did not have an increased risk of breast cancer, but current users did have an increased risk, with some studies reporting increasing risk with duration of ERT. No relationship was found between dose or the addition of progestin to ERT and increased breast cancer risk. Overall breast cancer mortality rates associated with HRT were decreased in current users. In general, HRT does not increase the risk of breast cancer in women with a family history of the disease, compared with those without a family history. New HRT strategies that could potentially prevent breast cancer are now being developed. The SERMs tamoxifen and toremifene appear to have positive clinical effects on bone and serum lipids; they are currently being investigated for use as breast cancer chemopreventive agents. Raloxifene, a new SERM used for the prevention of osteoporosis, is an alternative for women who cannot tolerate HRT. Unfortunately, these SERMS have anti-estrogenic effects and thus cause vasomotor adverse effects such as hot flashes and vaginal dryness. In addition, SERMs do not protect against heart disease or prevent osteoporosis as well as does HRT. CONCLUSION: Presently, SERMs will not become first-line HRT, as the positive effects of ERT/HRT may outweigh any potentially increased risk of breast cancer. The development of new agents with pharmacodynamic profiles similar to that of ERT/HRT but lacking its adverse effects would be greatly beneficial for postmenopausal women.