'Luckily, I don't believe in statistics': survey of women's understanding of chance of success with futile fertility treatments.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Why are women who face poor prognoses for success in assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment choosing to pursue procedures using their own eggs, despite receiving information that their chances of success are very low. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study based on an anonymous questionnaire distributed to women aged between 43 and 45 years, undergoing ART using their own oocytes, at six public outpatient fertility clinics and three public in-hospital IVF units in Israel between 2015 and 2016. The main outcome measure was personal estimation of chance to achieve a live birth after the current ART treatment cycle and the cumulative estimated rate after all the treatment cycles the patient intended to undergo. RESULTS: Response rate was 70.0%, with 91 participants of mean age 43.8 ± 0.7 years. Participants estimated their delivery rates after the next ART treatment cycle at 49.0 ± 31.8% (response rate 93.4%) and their cumulative delivery rates after all the ART treatments they would undergo at 57.7 ± 36.3% (response rate 90.1%). This is significantly higher than the predicted success rates of 5% and 15%, respectively (both P < 0.001), which are based on national register data. Nearly one-half of patients rated themselves as having a better than average chance of conception (47.3%). CONCLUSION: Women do not pursue futile treatments because they lack information. Despite being informed of the low success rates of conception using ART treatments, many patients of advanced maternal age have unrealistically high expectations from ART, essentially ignoring their estimated prognosis when deciding on treatment continuation. Future work should examine the psychological reasons behind continuing futile fertility treatments.

Shared Decision-Making in Femoral Versus Radial Cardiac Catheterization.

Shared decision-making is a strategy to assist with patient involvement in medical decisions. One of its pillars is patient knowledge and understanding of the risks and benefits associated with specific procedures. We studied patient knowledge about transradial (TRA) and transfemoral (TFA) cardiac catheterization. A prospective study was conducted in 100 patients hospitalized following diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac catheterization-TRA in 71% of patients and remaining TFA. All patients were presented a standard balanced informed consent outlining risks and benefits. Following catheterization, patients were verbally administered an 11-item open-ended questionnaire to assess knowledge of cardiac catheterization and the associated risks and benefits. A patient knowledge index (PKI) was developed with 1 point given for: identifying the procedure; correctly describing the procedure; identifying at least 1 risk of TRA; and/or TFA; and at least 1 benefit of TRA; and/or TFA. Maximum PKI score was 6. The mean PKI score was 2.6 ± 1.1. A PKI score ≥4 was observed in 21% of patients with only 1 patient obtaining the maximum 6 points. Over 80% of patients were unable to recall procedure risks provided at the time of informed consent. The majority of patients were unable to discriminate between TRA and TFA risks and benefits, PKI 2.52 versus 2.60, respectively (p = 0.718). On multivariate analysis, higher education levels were correlated with increased PKI scores (odds ratio = 0.65, p = 0.014) whereas black race was associated with lower PKI scores (odds ratio = -0.48, p = 0.045). In conclusion, patient retention of information from the informed consent was low. The majority of patients had no preference or deferred to their physician's expertise when deciding TRA compared with TFA. This study identifies challenges with implementing shared decision-making and the need for improved patient education and involvement regarding cardiac catheterization.