ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of volatile anesthetic agents to maintain bispectral index (BIS) below 50 in 50% of patients was defined as MACBIS50. The primary objective of this study was to determine the minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane as a single hypnotic agent to maintain BIS below 50 in patients during normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. DESIGN: Prospective and observational study. SETTING: Dante Pazzanese Institute of Cardiology, Brazil. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen consecutive patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) under general anesthesia, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classes III and IV, between the ages of 40 and 70, were included in the study. METHODS: All patients underwent inhalation induction with facial mask using sevoflurane (Cristália) in 100% oxygen, pancuronium (Cristália) 0.1 mg/kg, and sufentanil (Cristália) 0.5 µg/kg intravenously (IV) administered. A single bolus dose of sufentanil, 1.0 µg/kg IV, was administered before surgical incision. MACBIS50 was calculated using the midpoint concentration of patients involving a crossover (BIS < or ≥50) according to Dixon's Up-and-Down method. The Up-and-Down sequence also was analyzed by probit test that enabled the authors to obtain the effective dose 50 (ED50) and effective dose 95 (ED95) of sevoflurane to maintain a BIS value <50, with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the mean. RESULTS: A total of 15 patients were analyzed in this study. MACBIS50 of sevoflurane as a single hypnotic agent was 0.82% (95% CI 0.47-1.16) in patients aged 40 to 70 undergoing CABG during normothermic CPB. The ED50 and ED95 of sevoflurane to maintain a BIS value <50 for the same context were 0.73% (95% CI 0.45-1.00) and 1.39 (95% CI 0.42-2.37) by means of probit analysis, respectively. CONCLUSION: MACBIS50 of sevoflurane as a single hypnotic agent was 0.82% in patients undergoing CABG during normothermic CPB.
Subject(s)
Inhalation , Sevoflurane , AnestheticsABSTRACT
In 2017, the Brazilian Society of Anesthesiology (SBA) and the National Medical Residency Committee (CNRM) presented a joint competence matrix to train and evaluate physicians specializing in Anesthesiology, which was enforced in 2019. The competency-based curriculum aims to train residents in relation to certain results, in that residents are considered capable when they are able to act in an appropriate and effective manner within certain standards of performance. Canada and the United States (US) also use competency-based curriculum to train their professionals. In Canada, the format is the basis for using an evaluation method known as Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA), in which the mentor assesses residents' capacity to perform certain tasks, classified in 5 levels. The US, in turn, uses Milestones as evaluation, in which competencies and sub-competencies are assessed according to residents' progress during training. The present article aims to describe and compare the different competency-based curriculum and the evaluation methods used in the three countries, and proposes a reflection on future paths for medical education in Anesthesiology in Brazil.
Subject(s)
Anesthesiology , Internship and Residency , Anesthesiology/education , Brazil , Canada , Clinical Competence , Competency-Based Education , Humans , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of volatile anesthetic agents to maintain bispectral index (BIS) below 50 in 50% of patients was defined as MACBIS50. The primary objective of this study was to determine the minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane as a single hypnotic agent to maintain BIS below 50 in patients during normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass. DESIGN: Prospective and observational study. SETTING: Dante Pazzanese Institute of Cardiology, Brazil. PARTICIPANTS: Eighteen consecutive patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) under general anesthesia, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classes III and IV, between the ages of 40 and 70, were included in the study. METHODS: All patients underwent inhalation induction with facial mask using sevoflurane (Cristália) in 100% oxygen, pancuronium (Cristália) 0.1 mg/kg, and sufentanil (Cristália) 0.5 µg/kg intravenously (IV) administered. A single bolus dose of sufentanil, 1.0 µg/kg IV, was administered before surgical incision. MACBIS50 was calculated using the midpoint concentration of patients involving a crossover (BIS < or ≥50) according to Dixon's Up-and-Down method. The Up-and-Down sequence also was analyzed by probit test that enabled the authors to obtain the effective dose 50 (ED50) and effective dose 95 (ED95) of sevoflurane to maintain a BIS value <50, with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the mean. RESULTS: A total of 15 patients were analyzed in this study. MACBIS50 of sevoflurane as a single hypnotic agent was 0.82% (95% CI 0.47-1.16) in patients aged 40 to 70 undergoing CABG during normothermic CPB. The ED50 and ED95 of sevoflurane to maintain a BIS value <50 for the same context were 0.73% (95% CI 0.45-1.00) and 1.39 (95% CI 0.42-2.37) by means of probit analysis, respectively. CONCLUSION: MACBIS50 of sevoflurane as a single hypnotic agent was 0.82% in patients undergoing CABG during normothermic CPB.
Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Methyl Ethers , Adult , Aged , Brazil , Cardiopulmonary Bypass , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , SevofluraneABSTRACT
This second joint document, written by experts from the Brazilian Association of Allergy and Immunology (ASBAI) and Brazilian Society of Anesthesiology (SBA) concerned with perioperative anaphylaxis, aims to review the pathophysiological reaction mechanisms, triggering agents (in adults and children), and the approach for diagnosis during and after an episode of anaphylaxis. As anaphylaxis assessment is extensive, the identification of medications, antiseptics and other substances used at each setting, the comprehensive data documentation, and the use of standardized nomenclature are key points for obtaining more consistent epidemiological information on perioperative anaphylaxis.
Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Perioperative Period , Adult , Allergy and Immunology , Anaphylaxis/physiopathology , Anesthesiology , Angioedema/chemically induced , Bradykinin/adverse effects , Brazil , Child , Drug Hypersensitivity/physiopathology , Humans , IgA Deficiency/complications , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , In Vitro Techniques , Mastocytosis/complications , Preoperative Care , Risk Factors , Skin Tests/methods , Societies, Medical , Symptom Assessment , Terminology as Topic , Vasodilator Agents/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Abstract This second joint document, written by experts from the Brazilian Association of Allergy and Immunology (ASBAI) and Brazilian Society of Anesthesiology (SBA) concerned with perioperative anaphylaxis, aims to review the pathophysiological reaction mechanisms, triggering agents (in adults and children), and the approach for diagnosis during and after an episode of anaphylaxis. As anaphylaxis assessment is extensive, the identification of medications, antiseptics and other substances used at each setting, the comprehensive data documentation, and the use of standardized nomenclature are key points for obtaining more consistent epidemiological information on perioperative anaphylaxis.
Resumo Este segundo documento, escrito por especialistas da Associação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunologia (ASBAI) e da Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA) interessados no tema anafilaxia perioperatória, tem por objetivo revisar os mecanismos fisiopatológicos, agentes desencadeantes (em adultos e crianças), assim como a abordagem diagnóstica durante e após o episódio. Por se tratar de uma avaliação abrangente, a identificação das medicações, antissépticos e outras substâncias usadas em cada região, registros detalhados, e nomenclatura padronizada são pontos fundamentais para a obtenção de dados epidemiológicos mais fidedignos sobre a anafilaxia perioperatória.
Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Adult , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Perioperative Period , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Societies, Medical , Vasodilator Agents/adverse effects , In Vitro Techniques , Mastocytosis/complications , Brazil , Preoperative Care , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Bradykinin/adverse effects , Skin Tests/methods , Risk Factors , IgA Deficiency/complications , Drug Hypersensitivity/physiopathology , Allergy and Immunology , Symptom Assessment , Anaphylaxis/physiopathology , Anesthesiology , Angioedema/chemically induced , Terminology as TopicABSTRACT
Experts from the Brazilian Association of Allergy and Immunology (ASBAI) and the Brazilian Society of Anesthesiology (SBA) interested in the issue of perioperative anaphylaxis, and aiming to strengthen the collaboration between the two societies, combined efforts to study the topic and to prepare a joint document to guide specialists in both areas. The purpose of the present series of two articles was to report the most recent evidence based on the collaborative assessment between both societies. This first article will consider the updated definitions, treatment and guidelines after a perioperative crisis. The following article will discuss the major etiologic agents, how to proceed with the investigation, and the appropriate tests.
Subject(s)
Anesthesiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Brazil , Humans , Perioperative PeriodABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) is a public health problem of high prevalence and impacts on quality of life, anesthetic complications and cardiovascular diseases. In view of the difficulty in accessing the polysomnography, it is necessary to validate other methods for OSAS diagnostic screening in clinical practice in our country, such as the STOP-Bang questionnaire. OBJECTIVE: To validate the STOP-Bang questionnaire in Brazilians and evaluate optimal cutoff points. METHODS: After translation and back-translation, STOP-Bang questionnaire was applied to 71 individuals previously submitted to polysomnography and classified into control, mild, moderate or severe OSAS. RESULTS: The majority of patients was male (59.2%), white (79%), aged 48.9±13.9 years, and with neck circumference >40 centimeters (73.8%). STOP-Bang score was higher in OSAS mild (median/inter-quartis 25-75%: 5/3.5-6), moderate (4.5/4-5) and severe (5/4-6), versus control (2.5/1-4). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve indicate that scores 3, 4 and 6, present the best specificity values (100, 80 and 92.9%) with acceptable sensitivity (60, 66.7 and 50%) in the mild, moderate and severe OSAS subgroups, respectively. In OSAS group analysis (Apnea Hypopnea Index [AHI] ≥5, <15, ≥15 - <30, ≥30), STOP-Bang cutoff point of 6 was optimal to detect OSAS. CONCLUSION: STOP-Bang Brazilian version identified OSAS patients with lower sensitivity and higher specificity compared to previous studies. Different cutoff points would improve the performance to detect patients with more severe OSAS.
Subject(s)
Quality of Life , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , Adult , Brazil , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Polysomnography , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Abstract Experts from the Brazilian Association of Allergy and Immunology (ASBAI) and the Brazilian Society of Anesthesiology (SBA) interested in the issue of perioperative anaphylaxis, and aiming to strengthen the collaboration between the two societies, combined efforts to study the topic and to prepare a joint document to guide specialists in both areas. The purpose of the present series of two articles was to report the most recent evidence based on the collaborative assessment between both societies. This first article will consider the updated definitions, treatment and guidelines after a perioperative crisis. The following article will discuss the major etiologic agents, how to proceed with the investigation, and the appropriate tests.
Resumo Especialistas da Associação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunologia (ASBAI) e da Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA) interessados no tema anafilaxia perioperatória reuniram-se com o objetivo de intensificar a colaboração entre as duas sociedades no estudo desse tema e elaborar um documento conjunto que possa guiar os especialistas de ambas as áreas. O objetivo desta série de dois artigos foi mostrar as evidências mais recentes alicerçadas na visão colaborativa entre as sociedades. Este primeiro artigo versará sobre as definições mais atuais, formas de tratamento e as orientações após a crise no perioperatório. No próximo artigo serão discutidos os principais agentes causais e a condução da investigação com testes apropriados.
Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Adult , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Perioperative Period , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Societies, Medical , Vasodilator Agents/adverse effects , In Vitro Techniques , Mastocytosis/complications , Brazil , Preoperative Care , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Bradykinin/adverse effects , Skin Tests/methods , Risk Factors , IgA Deficiency/complications , Drug Hypersensitivity/physiopathology , Allergy and Immunology , Symptom Assessment , Anaphylaxis/physiopathology , Anesthesiology , Angioedema/chemically induced , Terminology as TopicABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Background: Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS) is a public health problem of high prevalence and impacts on quality of life, anesthetic complications and cardiovascular diseases. In view of the difficulty in accessing the polysomnography, it is necessary to validate other methods for OSAS diagnostic screening in clinical practice in our country, such as the STOP-Bang questionnaire. Objective: To validate the STOP-Bang questionnaire in Brazilians and evaluate optimal cutoff points. Methods: After translation and back-translation, STOP-Bang questionnaire was applied to 71 individuals previously submitted to polysomnography and classified into control, mild, moderate or severe OSAS. Results: The majority of patients was male (59.2%), white (79%), aged 48.9±13.9 years, and with neck circumference >40 centimeters (73.8%). STOP-Bang score was higher in OSAS mild (median/inter-quartis 25-75%: 5/3.5-6), moderate (4.5/4-5) and severe (5/4-6), versus control (2.5/1-4). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve indicate that scores 3, 4 and 6, present the best specificity values (100, 80 and 92.9%) with acceptable sensitivity (60, 66.7 and 50%) in the mild, moderate and severe OSAS subgroups, respectively. In OSAS group analysis (Apnea Hypopnea Index [AHI] ≥5, <15, ≥15 - <30, ≥30), STOP-Bang cutoff point of 6 was optimal to detect OSAS. Conclusion: STOP-Bang Brazilian version identified OSAS patients with lower sensitivity and higher specificity compared to previous studies. Different cutoff points would improve the performance to detect patients with more severe OSAS.
RESUMO Introdução: A Síndrome da Apneia Obstrutiva do Sono (SAOS) é um problema de saúde pública de alta prevalência e com impacto na qualidade de vida, complicações anestésicas e doenças cardiovasculares. Diante da dificuldade de acesso à realização da polissonografia, é necessário validar outros métodos para a triagem diagnóstica da SAOS na prática clínica no cenário brasileiro, como o questionário STOP-Bang. Objetivos: Validar o questionário STOP-Bang em brasileiros e avaliar os melhores pontos de corte. Método: Após tradução e retrotradução, o STOP-Bang foi aplicado em 71 indivíduos previamente submetidos à polissonografia e classificados em controles e em SAOS leve, moderada e grave. Resultados: A maioria da amostra foi de homens (59,2%), com 48,9±13,9 anos, brancos (79%) e com circunferência do pescoço >40 cm (73,8%). O escore STOP-Bang foi maior na SAOS leve (mediana/interquartis 25-75%: 5/3,5-6), moderada (4,5/4-5) e grave (5/4-6) versus controles (2,5/1-4). A Curva Característica de Operação do Receptor (ROC) indicou que os escores 3, 4 e 6 apresentam os melhores valores de especificidade (100, 80 e 92,9%) e sensibilidade aceitável (60, 66,7 e 50%) nos subgrupos de SAOS leve, moderada e grave, respectivamente. Na análise da amostra com SAOS (IAH ] ≥5, <15, ≥15 - <30, ≥30), o ponto de corte de 6 no STOP-Bang detectou melhor a SAOS. Conclusão: A versão brasileira do STOP-Bang identificou pacientes apneicos com menor sensibilidade e maior especificidade em relação a estudos anteriores. Diferentes pontos de corte melhorariam o desempenho para detectar pacientes com SAOS mais grave.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Brazil , Surveys and Questionnaires , Polysomnography , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosisABSTRACT
A anafilaxia perioperatória é manifestação importante no contexto de eventos adversos relacionados à cirurgia. Embora frequentemente relacionada à indução anestésica, pode ocorrer por outros agentes administrados por outras vias. A anafilaxia pode se apresentar como colapso cardiovascular, obstrução da via aérea e/ou insuficiência respiratória com ou sem manifestação cutânea, com consequências fatais em muito casos. Apesar de considerada inevitável em alguns casos, a sua incidência poderia (e deveria) ser reduzida através da busca por fármacos mais seguros. A avaliação abrangente de um episódio é um dos elementos primordiais para tornar a exposição subsequente mais segura, com orientações derivadas dessa investigação. Entretanto, representa um desafio estatístico por ser reação rara, randômica e muitas vezes independente de exposições sucessivas dos pacientes a procedimentos de baixo risco. Neste documento são revisados os mecanismos fisiopatológicos, agentes desencadeantes (adultos e crianças), assim como a abordagem diagnóstica durante a crise e após o episódio. Uma avaliação abrangente, a identificação das medicações, antissépticos e outras substâncias usadas em cada região, registros detalhados e nomenclatura padronizada são pontos fundamentais para a obtenção de dados epidemiológicos mais fidedignos sobre a anafilaxia perioperatória.
Perioperative anaphylaxis is an important manifestation in the context of surgery-related adverse events. Although often related to anesthetic induction, it may be caused by other agents administered by other routes. Anaphylaxis may manifest as cardiovascular collapse, airway obstruction and/or respiratory failure with or without skin manifestation, resulting often in death. Although this reaction is considered inevitable in some cases, its incidence could (and should) be reduced by the search for safer drugs. Comprehensive assessment of an allergic reaction is a key element to make subsequent exposure safer, with guidance derived from this investigation. However, surveillance of perioperative anaphylaxis represents a statistical challenge because this is a rare, random reaction and often independent of successive patient exposures to low-risk procedures. This paper reviews pathophysiological mechanisms, triggering agents (adults and children), as well as therapeutic and diagnostic approach during and after an allergic reaction. Comprehensive assessment, identification of medications/antiseptics used in each region and detailed records with standardized terminology are key points for obtaining more reliable epidemiological data on perioperative anaphylaxis.
Subject(s)
Humans , Societies, Medical , Drug Hypersensitivity , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Perioperative Period , Anaphylaxis , Anesthetics , Patients , Respiratory Insufficiency , Skin Manifestations , Therapeutics , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Epinephrine , Risk , Diagnosis , Allergy and ImmunologySubject(s)
Humans , Societies, Medical , Diagnosis , Allergy and Immunology , Perioperative Period , HypersensitivityABSTRACT
A anafilaxia perioperatória é manifestação importante no contexto de eventos adversos relacionados à cirurgia. Embora frequentemente relacionada à indução anestésica, pode ocorrer por outros agentes administrados por outras vias. A anafilaxia pode se apresentar como colapso cardiovascular, obstrução da via aérea e/ou insuficiência respiratória com ou sem manifestação cutânea, com consequências fatais em muito casos. Apesar de considerada inevitável em alguns casos, a sua incidência poderia (e deveria) ser reduzida através da busca por fármacos mais seguros. A avaliação abrangente de um episódio é um dos elementos primordiais para tornar a exposição subsequente mais segura, com orientações derivadas dessa investigação. Entretanto, representa um desafio estatístico por ser reação rara, randômica e muitas vezes independente de exposições sucessivas dos pacientes a procedimentos de baixo risco. Neste documento são revisados os mecanismos fisiopatológicos, agentes desencadeantes (adultos e crianças), assim como a abordagem diagnóstica durante a crise e após o episódio. Uma avaliação abrangente, a identificação das medicações, antissépticos e outras substâncias usadas em cada região, registros detalhados e nomenclatura padronizada são pontos fundamentais para a obtenção de dados epidemiológicos mais fidedignos sobre a anafilaxia perioperatória.
Perioperative anaphylaxis is an important manifestation in the context of surgery-related adverse events. Although often related to anesthetic induction, it may be caused by other agents administered by other routes. Anaphylaxis may manifest as cardiovascular collapse, airway obstruction and/or respiratory failure with or without skin manifestation, resulting often in death. Although this reaction is considered inevitable in some cases, its incidence could (and should) be reduced by the search for safer drugs. Comprehensive assessment of an allergic reaction is a key element to make subsequent exposure safer, with guidance derived from this investigation. However, surveillance of perioperative anaphylaxis represents a statistical challenge because this is a rare, random reaction and often independent of successive patient exposures to low-risk procedures. This paper reviews pathophysiological mechanisms, triggering agents (adults and children), as well as therapeutic and diagnostic approach during and after an allergic reaction. Comprehensive assessment, identification of medications/antiseptics used in each region and detailed records with standardized terminology are key points for obtaining more reliable epidemiological data on perioperative anaphylaxis.
Subject(s)
Humans , Societies, Medical , Drug Hypersensitivity , Perioperative Period , Anaphylaxis , Anesthetics , Patients , Research , Respiratory Insufficiency , Therapeutics , Mastocytosis , Immunoglobulin E , Skin Tests , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Epinephrine , Diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Allergy and Immunology , Tryptases , Hypersensitivity , AngioedemaABSTRACT
Especialistas da Associação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunologia (ASBAI) e da Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA), interessados no tema anafilaxia perioperatória, reuniram-se com o objetivo de intensificar a colaboração entre as duas sociedades no estudo desse tema e elaborar um documento conjunto que possa guiar ambos os especialistas. O objetivo desta série de dois artigos foi mostrar as evidências mais recentes alicerçadas na visão colaborativa entre as sociedades. Este primeiro artigo versará sobre as definições mais atuais, formas de tratamento e as orientações após a crise no perioperatório. No próximo artigo serão discutidos os principais agentes causais e a condução da investigação com testes apropriados.
Experts from the Brazilian Association of Allergy and Immunology (ASBAI) and Brazilian Society of Anesthesiology (SBA), interested in the topic of perioperative anaphylaxis, have met to strengthen collaboration between the two societies in the study of this topic and to draft a joint document that can provide guidance to members of both societies. The purpose of this series of two articles is to provide the latest evidence based on the collaborative view of both societies. This first article will cover the most current definitions, treatment modalities, and guidelines for management after a perioperative event. The second article will discuss major causative agents and whether investigation has been conducted with proper tests.
Subject(s)
Humans , Societies, Medical , Perioperative Period , Hypersensitivity , Anaphylaxis , Orientation , Research , Therapeutics , Allergy and Immunology , AnesthesiologyABSTRACT
Abstract Introduction: ENT patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome have a tendency of collapsing the upper airways in addition to anatomical obstacles. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome is related to the increased risk of difficult airway and also increased perioperative complications. In order to identify these patients in the preoperative period, the STOP Bang questionnaire has been highlighted because it is summarized and easy to apply. Objectives: Evaluate through the STOP Bang questionnaire whether patients undergoing ENT surgery with a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome have a higher risk of complications, particularly the occurrence of difficult airway. Casuistry and methods: Measurements of anatomical parameters for difficult airway and questionnaire application for clinical prediction of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome were performed in 48 patients with a previous polysomnographic study. Results: The sample detected difficult airway in about 18.7% of patients, all of them with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. This group had older age, cervical circumference > 40 cm, ASA II and Cormack III/IV. Patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome had higher body mass index, cervical circumference, and frequent apnea. In subgroup analysis, the group with severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome showed a significantly higher SB score compared to patients without this syndrome or with a mild/moderate obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Conclusions: The STOP Bang questionnaire was not able to predict difficult airway and mild obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, but it identified marked obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. All patients with difficult airway had moderate and marked obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, although this syndrome did not involve difficult airway. The variables Cormack III/IV and BMI greater than 35 kg.m−2 were able to predict difficult airway and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, respectively.
Resumo Introdução: Os pacientes cirúrgicos otorrinolaringológicos portadores da síndrome da apneia obstrutiva do sono apresentam, além de obstáculos anatômicos, tendência ao colapso das vias aéreas superiores. Síndrome da apneia obstrutiva do sono está relacionada ao maior risco de via aérea difícil e também aumento de complicações perioperatórias. A fim de se identificar esses pacientes no período pré-operatório, tem se destacado o questionário STOP Bang, por ser resumido e de fácil aplicação. Objetivos: Avaliar se pacientes submetidos à cirurgia otorrinolaringológica com diagnóstico de síndrome da apneia obstrutiva do sono pelo questionário STOP Bang apresentariam maior risco de complicações, particularmente ocorrência de via aérea difícil. Casuística e métodos: Feitas medidas de parâmetros anatômicos para via aérea difícil e administrado questionário para predição clínica de síndrome da apneia obstrutiva do sono em 48 pacientes com estudo polissonográfico prévio. Resultados: A amostra detectou via aérea difícil em 18,7% dos pacientes, todos portadores de síndrome da apneia obstrutiva do sono. Esse grupo apresentava maior idade, circunferência cervical > 40 cm, ASA II e Cormack III/IV. Os pacientes com síndrome da apneia obstrutiva do sono apresentaram maior índice de massa corpórea, circunferência cervical e frequência de apneia observada. Na análise de subgrupos, o grupo com síndrome da apneia obstrutiva do sono acentuada mostrou significantemente maior pontuação no SB quando comparado com pacientes sem síndrome da apneia obstrutiva do sono ou com síndrome da apneia obstrutiva do sono leve/moderada. Conclusões: O questionário STOP Bang não foi capaz de predizer via aérea difícil e nem síndrome da apneia obstrutiva do sono leve e moderada, mas identificou síndrome da apneia obstrutiva do sono acentuada. Todos pacientes com via aérea difícil apresentaram síndrome da apneia obstrutiva do sono moderada e acentuada, apesar desta síndrome não implicar em via aérea difícil. As variáveis Cormack III/IV e IMC maior do que 35 Kg.m-2 foram capazes de predizer via aérea difícil e síndrome da apneia obstrutiva do sono respectivamente.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/complications , Airway Obstruction/complications , Airway Obstruction/diagnosis , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosis , Correlation of Data , Middle AgedABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: ENT patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome have a tendency of collapsing the upper airways in addition to anatomical obstacles. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome is related to the increased risk of difficult airway and also increased perioperative complications. In order to identify these patients in the preoperative period, the STOP Bang questionnaire has been highlighted because it is summarized and easy to apply. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate through the STOP Bang questionnaire whether patients undergoing ENT surgery with a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome have a higher risk of complications, particularly the occurrence of difficult airway. CASUISTRY AND METHODS: Measurements of anatomical parameters for difficult airway and questionnaire application for clinical prediction of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome were performed in 48 patients with a previous polysomnographic study. RESULTS: The sample detected difficult airway in about 18.7% of patients, all of them with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. This group had older age, cervical circumference > 40cm, ASA II and Cormack III/IV. Patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome had higher body mass index, cervical circumference, and frequent apnea. In subgroup analysis, the group with severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome showed a significantly higher SB score compared to patients without this syndrome or with a mild/moderate obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: The STOP Bang questionnaire was not able to predict difficult airway and mild obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, but it identified marked obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. All patients with difficult airway had moderate and marked obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, although this syndrome did not involve difficult airway. The variables Cormack III/IV and BMI greater than 35 Kg.m-2 were able to predict difficult airway and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, respectively.
Subject(s)
Airway Obstruction/complications , Airway Obstruction/diagnosis , Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/complications , Adult , Correlation of Data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/diagnosisABSTRACT
Abstract Background and objectives: The advent of ultrasound has brought many benefits to peripheral nerve blocks. It includes both safety and effectiveness, given the possibility of visualizing the neurovascular structures and the needle during the procedure. Despite these benefits, there is no consensus in the literature on the use of this technique in anticoagulated patients or with other coagulation disorders. Moreover, peripheral blocks vary in depth, spreadability, and possibility of local compression. However, few societies take it into account when drawing up its recommendations, establishing a single recommendation for performing peripheral blocks, regardless of the route used. The objective of this series is to expand the discussion on peripheral nerve block in anticoagulated patients. Case reports: This series reports 9 cases of superficial peripheral nerve blocks guided by ultrasound in patients with primary or secondary dyscrasias. All blocks were performed by experienced anesthesiologists in the management of ultrasound, and there was no bruising or neurological injuries in the cases. Conclusions: This case series support the discussion on conducting surface peripheral nerve blocks and easy local knowledge as the axillary, interscalene, femoral, saphenous or popliteal in anticoagulated patients, on dual antiaggregation therapy and/or with other coagulation disorders, provided that guided by ultrasound and performed by an anesthesiologist with extensive experience in guided nerve blocks. However, larger series should be performed to prove the safety of the technique for these patients.
Resumo Justificativa e objetivos: O advento da ultrassonografia trouxe inúmeros benefícios para os bloqueios de nervos periféricos. Agregou tanto segurança quanto eficácia, dada a possibilidade de visualização de estruturas neurovasculares e da agulha durante o procedimento. Apesar desses benefícios, não há consenso na literatura sobre o uso da técnica em pacientes anticoagulados ou com outros distúrbios da coagulação. Além disso, os bloqueios periféricos variam com relação à profundidade, expansibilidade e possibilidade de compressão local. Porém, poucas sociedades levam isso em consideração para elaborar suas recomendações, estabelecem um recomendação única para bloqueios periféricos, independentemente da via usada. O objetivo desta série é ampliar a discussão sobre bloqueio de nervos periféricos em pacientes anticoagulados. Relato de casos: Esta série relata 9 casos de bloqueios de nervos periféricos superficiais guiados por ultrassonografia em pacientes com discrasias primárias ou secundárias. Todos os bloqueios foram feitos por anestesiologistas experientes no manejo do ultrassom, que não foram observados hematomas ou lesões neurológicas nos casos. Conclusões: A série de casos em questão ajuda a discussão sobre bloqueios periféricos superficiais e de fácil compressão local, como o axilar, interescalênico, femoral, safeno ou poplíteo, em pacientes anticoagulados, duplamente antiagregados e/ou com outros distúrbios da coagulação desde que guiados por ultrassom e feitos por anestesiologista com vasta experiência em bloqueios guiados. Entretanto, maiores séries devem ser feitas para comprovar a segurança da técnica para esses pacientes.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Aged , Surgical Procedures, Operative/methods , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Nerve Block/methods , Sciatic Nerve , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Femoral Nerve , Brachial Plexus Block/methods , Middle AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The advent of ultrasound has brought many benefits to peripheral nerve blocks. It includes both safety and effectiveness, given the possibility of visualizing the neurovascular structures and the needle during the procedure. Despite these benefits, there is no consensus in the literature on the use of this technique in anticoagulated patients or with other coagulation disorders. Moreover, peripheral blocks vary in depth, spreadability, and possibility of local compression. However, few societies take it into account when drawing up its recommendations, establishing a single recommendation for performing peripheral blocks, regardless of the route used. The objective of this series is to expand the discussion on peripheral nerve block in anticoagulated patients. CASE REPORTS: This series reports 9 cases of superficial peripheral nerve blocks guided by ultrasound in patients with primary or secondary dyscrasias. All blocks were performed by experienced anesthesiologists in the management of ultrasound, and there was no bruising or neurological injuries in the cases. CONCLUSIONS: This case series support the discussion on conducting surface peripheral nerve blocks and easy local knowledge as the axillary, interscalene, femoral, saphenous or popliteal in anticoagulated patients, on dual antiaggregation therapy and/or with other coagulation disorders, provided that guided by ultrasound and performed by an anesthesiologist with extensive experience in guided nerve blocks. However, larger series should be performed to prove the safety of the technique for these patients.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The advent of ultrasound has brought many benefits to peripheral nerve blocks. It includes both safety and effectiveness, given the possibility of visualizing the neurovascular structures and the needle during the procedure. Despite these benefits, there is no consensus in the literature on the use of this technique in anticoagulated patients or with other coagulation disorders. Moreover, peripheral blocks vary in depth, spreadability, and possibility of local compression. However, few societies take it into account when drawing up its recommendations, establishing a single recommendation for performing peripheral blocks, regardless of the route used. The objective of this series is to expand the discussion on peripheral nerve block in anticoagulated patients. CASE REPORTS: This series reports 9 cases of superficial peripheral nerve blocks guided by ultrasound in patients with primary or secondary dyscrasias. All blocks were performed by experienced anesthesiologists in the management of ultrasound, and there was no bruising or neurological injuries in the cases. CONCLUSIONS: This case series support the discussion on conducting surface peripheral nerve blocks and easy local knowledge as the axillary, interscalene, femoral, saphenous or popliteal in anticoagulated patients, on dual antiaggregation therapy and/or with other coagulation disorders, provided that guided by ultrasound and performed by an anesthesiologist with extensive experience in guided nerve blocks. However, larger series should be performed to prove the safety of the technique for these patients.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Nerve Block/methods , Surgical Procedures, Operative/methods , Adult , Aged , Brachial Plexus Block/methods , Female , Femoral Nerve , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sciatic Nerve , Ultrasonography, InterventionalABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Concerns regarding pollution of the operating room by volatile anesthetics and effects on atmospheric ozone depletion exist. Volatile agents commonly are used during cardiopulmonary bypass to provide anesthesia independent of any supposed myocardial protective effects. The authors' aim was to create and to assess the performance of a prototype filter for volatile agents to be connected to the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit to avoid the emission of volatile agents to the operating room, and also to the environment without causing damage to the membrane oxygenator. DESIGN: Observational trial. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Prototype filter for volatile agents. INTERVENTIONS: The prototype filter was tested in a single ex vivo experiment. The main data measured during the test were pressure drop to detect interference with the performance of the oxygenator, back pressure to detect overpressure to the outlet gas jacket of the oxygenator, analysis of exhaled sevoflurane after the membrane oxygenator, and after the filter to detect any presence of sevoflurane. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The prototype filter adsorbed the sevoflurane eliminated through the outlet portion of the oxygenator. During the entire test, the back pressure remained constant (4 mmHg) and pressure drop varied from 243 mmHg to 247 mmHg. CONCLUSION: The prototype filter was considered suitable to absorb the sevoflurane, and it did not cause an overpressure to the membrane oxygenator during the test.
