Accuracy of Preoperative Templating in Total Hip Arthroplasty With Special Focus on Stem Morphology: A Randomized Comparison Between Common Digital and Three-Dimensional Planning Using Biplanar Radiographs.

BACKGROUND: Accurate preoperative planning is a key component of successful total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of the present study was to compare the accuracy and reliability of three-dimensional (hipEOS) and common digital two-dimensional (TraumaCad) templating with special focus on stem morphology. METHODS: 51 patients undergoing THA were randomized to two groups. Preoperative planning was performed on 23 patients with hipEOS (3D) and on 28 patients with TraumaCad (2D) planning software. Planning results were compared with the implanted component size. Inter- and intraobserver reliability as well as planning accuracy of both planning methods with special focus on straight and short stem design were recorded. RESULTS: Intraobserver reliability of both planning methods was good for component planning (ICC2,1: 0.835-0.967). Interobserver ICC2,1 for stem and cup planning were higher for 3D templating (3D ICC2,1: 0.906-0.918 vs. 2D ICC2,1: 0.835-0.843). Total stem and cup size predictions were within 2 sizes for 3D and within 3 sizes for 2D planning. Comparing short stem planning accuracy of both planning methods, absolute difference between implanted and planned component size was significantly lower in 3D planning (P = .029). There was no significant difference in straight stem (P = .935) and cup (P = .954) planning accuracy. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that 3D templating with hipEOS software has a good overall reliability and may have a better planning accuracy of short stem prostheses than digital templating with TraumaCad software. Assuming that the number of implanted short stem prostheses will further increase in coming years, a more precise planning with 3D technique can contribute to improve surgery outcome.

Are changes in radiological leg alignment and femoral parameters after total hip replacement responsible for joint loading during gait?

BACKGROUND: Gait kinematics after total hip replacement only partly explain the differences in the joint moments in the frontal plane between hip osteoarthritis patients after hip replacement and healthy controls. The goal of this study was to determine if total hip replacement surgery affects radiological leg alignment (Hip-Knee-Shaft-Angle, femoral offset, Neck-Shaft-Angle and varus/valgus alignment) and which of these parameters can explain the joint moments, additionally to the gait kinematics. METHODS: 22 unilateral hip osteoarthritis patients who were scheduled for total hip replacement were included in the study. Preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively all patients had biplanar radiographic examinations and 3D gait analysis. RESULTS: The operated leg showed significantly (P < 0.05) more varus (1.1°) as well as a larger femoral offset (+ 8 mm) and a larger Hip-Knee-Shaft-Angle (+ 1.3°) after total hip replacement; however no significant differences in the joint moments in the frontal plane compared to healthy controls were found. The hip moment (first half of stance) and the knee moments (first and second half of stance) were mostly determined by the varus/valgus alignment (29% and respectively 36% and 35%). The combination with a kinematic parameter (knee range of motion, foot progression angle) increased the predictive value for the knee moments. CONCLUSION: In our patient group the joint moments after total hip replacement did not differ from healthy controls, whereas radiological leg alignment parameters changed significantly after the total hip replacement. A combination of these radiological leg parameters, especially the varus alignment, and the deviating kinematics explain the joint moments in the frontal plane during gait after total hip replacement surgery. For surgeons it is important not to create too much of a structural varus alignment by implanting the new hip joint as varus alignment can increase the knee adduction moment and the risk for osteoarthritis of the medial knee compartment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was retrospectively registered with DRKS (German Clinical Trials Register) under the number DRKS00015053. Registered 1st of August 2018.

Influence of Hip Geometry Reconstruction on Frontal Plane Hip and Knee Joint Moments During Walking Following Primary Total Hip Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Following total hip replacement (THR), hip geometry reconstruction parameters such as the femoral offset (FO) correlate with hip stability and wear. The purpose of this study is to determine the relationship between hip geometry parameters and knee and hip joint loading during walking. METHODS: Forty-one patients were examined before and a minimum of 1 year after primary THR. Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was performed to identify relationships between radiographic parameters and gait data. In addition, we divided patients into 2 groups according to the restoration of the FO (within ±5 mm vs more than 5 mm increment). RESULTS: The FO and global offset (GO) showed a positive correlation with the first (r = 0.469, P = .002; r = 0.542, P < .001) and second (r = 0.365, P = .019; r = 0.484, P = .001) knee adduction moment (KAM). The neck-shaft angle revealed a negative correlation with the first hip adduction moment (r = -0.375, P = .047). The reconstruction of FO with an increment of more than 5 mm was associated with a significant higher first KAM (+16%, P = .045) compared to the restored group. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that abnormal hip and knee joint loading during walking after THR have a biomechanical background originating from hip geometry reconstruction. Patients with a high FO/GO were more likely to have an increased KAM during walking or vice versa. Surgeons need to be aware that an accurate control of FO, GO, and neck-shaft angle restoration in THR has an impact on hip and knee joint loading that may influence degenerative changes of the knee and higher wear of the artificial hip joint, respectively.

Abnormal loading of the hip and knee joints in unilateral hip osteoarthritis persists two years after total hip replacement.

A total hip replacement (THR) is a common and routine procedure to reduce pain and restore normal activity. Gait analysis can provide insights into functional characteristics and dynamic joint loading situation not identifiable by clinical examination or static radiographic measures. The present prospective longitudinal study tested whether 2 years after surgery a THR would restore dynamic loading of the knee and hip joints in the frontal plane to normal. Instrumented gait analysis was performed shortly before surgery and approximately 2 years after THR on 15 unilateral hip osteoarthritis (OA) patients. 15 asymptomatic matched individuals were recruited as healthy controls. Results showed that abnormal joint loading persisted 2 years after THR. The 2nd external knee adduction moment in terminal stance in the affected (-34%, p = 0.002, d = 1.22) and non-affected limb (-25%, p = 0.035, d = 0.81) was lower compared to controls and thus indicated a shift in the knee joint load distribution from medial to lateral. A correlation analysis revealed that a smaller hip range of motion explained 46% of 2nd knee adduction moment alterations. In contrast, the 2nd external hip adduction moment in terminal stance was postoperatively higher in the affected (+22%, p = 0.007, d = 1.04) and non-affected limb (+22%, p = 0.005, d = 1.05). Here, 51% of 2nd hip adduction moment alterations can be explained with a greater hip adduction angle. Patients with a THR may therefore be at higher risk for abnormal joint loading and thus for the development of OA in other joints of the lower extremities. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res.