ABSTRACT
Importance: Practice guidelines often provide recommendations in which the strength of the recommendation is dissociated from the quality of the evidence. Objective: To create a clinical guideline for the diagnosis and management of adult bacterial infective endocarditis (IE) that addresses the gap between the evidence and recommendation strength. Evidence Review: This consensus statement and systematic review applied an approach previously established by the WikiGuidelines Group to construct collaborative clinical guidelines. In April 2022 a call to new and existing members was released electronically (social media and email) for the next WikiGuidelines topic, and subsequently, topics and questions related to the diagnosis and management of adult bacterial IE were crowdsourced and prioritized by vote. For each topic, PubMed literature searches were conducted including all years and languages. Evidence was reported according to the WikiGuidelines charter: clear recommendations were established only when reproducible, prospective, controlled studies provided hypothesis-confirming evidence. In the absence of such data, clinical reviews were crafted discussing the risks and benefits of different approaches. Findings: A total of 51 members from 10 countries reviewed 587 articles and submitted information relevant to 4 sections: establishing the diagnosis of IE (9 questions); multidisciplinary IE teams (1 question); prophylaxis (2 questions); and treatment (5 questions). Of 17 unique questions, a clear recommendation could only be provided for 1 question: 3 randomized clinical trials have established that oral transitional therapy is at least as effective as intravenous (IV)-only therapy for the treatment of IE. Clinical reviews were generated for the remaining questions. Conclusions and Relevance: In this consensus statement that applied the WikiGuideline method for clinical guideline development, oral transitional therapy was at least as effective as IV-only therapy for the treatment of IE. Several randomized clinical trials are underway to inform other areas of practice, and further research is needed.
Subject(s)
Endocarditis, Bacterial , Endocarditis , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Adult , Humans , Consensus , Endocarditis/diagnosis , Endocarditis/therapy , Endocarditis, Bacterial/prevention & control , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative pathogen of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is highly contagious and has a variety of clinical manifestations, including liver injury. There have been a few reports indicating acute-on chronic liver failure among COVID-19 patients, however, patients with COVID-19-related liver injury are generally asymptomatic and present with a mild to moderate elevation in serum hepatic enzymes. Severe COVID-19 patients have high rates of liver injury with poorer outcomes. The pattern of abnormalities in liver biochemical indicators may be hepatocellular, cholestatic, or mixed. Although the pathogenesis of hepatic injury is not yet completely understood, causes of liver damage include systemic inflammatory response syndrome, ischemia-reperfusion injury, side effects of medications, and underlying chronic liver disease. While viral RNA has been detected in hepatocytes, it remains unknown if the coronavirus has the capacity to cause cytopathic effects in hepatic tissue. Additionally, it is important to remember that the current upheaval to daily life and access to healthcare caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant and negative effect on other patients with chronic liver disease. The objective of this review was to summarize the current literature on COVID-19-related hepatic injury with an examination of clinical features, potential pathogenesis, and histopathological findings of this entity.
