ABSTRACT
GENERAL PURPOSE: To review a practical and scientifically sound application of the wound bed preparation model for communities without ideal resources. TARGET AUDIENCE: This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and registered nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES: After participating in this educational activity, the participant will:1. Summarize issues related to wound assessment.2. Identify a class of drugs for the treatment of type II diabetes mellitus that has been shown to improve glycemia, nephroprotection, and cardiovascular outcomes.3. Synthesize strategies for wound management, including treatment in resource-limited settings.4. Specify the target time for edge advancement in chronic, healable wounds.
Chronic wound management in low-resource settings deserves special attention. Rural or underresourced settings (ie, those with limited basic needs/healthcare supplies and inconsistent availability of interprofessional team members) may not have the capacity to apply or duplicate best practices from urban or abundantly-resourced settings. The authors linked world expertise to develop a practical and scientifically sound application of the wound bed preparation model for communities without ideal resources. A group of 41 wound experts from 15 countries reached a consensus on wound bed preparation in resource-limited settings. Each statement of 10 key concepts (32 substatements) reached more than 88% consensus. The consensus statements and rationales can guide clinical practice and research for practitioners in low-resource settings. These concepts should prompt ongoing innovation to improve patient outcomes and healthcare system efficiency for all persons with foot ulcers, especially persons with diabetes.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Diabetic Foot , Foot Ulcer , Humans , Delphi Technique , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Diabetic Foot/diagnosis , Diabetic Foot/therapy , Resource-Limited SettingsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Information on sternal wound management in children after cardiac surgery is limited. The authors formulated a pediatric sternal wound care schematic incorporating concepts of interprofessional wound care and the wound bed preparation paradigm including negative-pressure wound therapy and surgical techniques to expedite and streamline wound care in children. METHODS: Authors assessed knowledge about sternal wound care among nurses, surgeons, intensivists, and physicians in a pediatric cardiac surgical unit regarding the latest concepts such as wound bed preparation, NERDS and STONEES criteria for wound infection, and early use of negative-pressure wound therapy or surgery. Management pathways for superficial and deep sternal wounds and a wound progress chart were prepared and introduced in practice after education and training. RESULTS: The cardiac surgical unit team members demonstrated a lack of knowledge about the current concepts of wound care, although this improved after education. The newly proposed management pathway/algorithm for superficial and deep sternal wounds and a wound progress assessment chart were introduced into practice. Results in 16 observed patients were encouraging, leading to complete healing and no mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Managing pediatric sternal wounds after cardiac surgery can be streamlined by incorporating evidence-based current wound care concepts. In addition, the early introduction of advanced care techniques with appropriate surgical closure further improves outcomes. A management pathway for pediatric sternal wounds is beneficial.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Surgical Wound Infection , Humans , Child , Surgical Wound Infection/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Sternum/surgery , Wound HealingABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The information on sternal wound management in children after cardiac surgery is limited. The authors formulated a pediatric sternal wound care schematic incorporating concepts of interprofessional wound care and the wound bed preparation paradigm including negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) and surgical techniques to expedite and streamline wound care in children. METHODS: Authors assessed knowledge about sternal wound care among nurses, surgeons, intensivists, and physicians in a pediatric cardiac surgical unit regarding the latest concepts such as wound bed preparation, NERDS and STONEES criteria for wound infection, and early use of NPWT or surgery. Management pathways for superficial and deep sternal wounds and a wound progress chart were prepared and introduced in practice after education and training. RESULTS: The cardiac surgical unit team members demonstrated a lack of knowledge about the current concepts of wound care, although this improved after education. The newly proposed management pathway/algorithm for superficial and deep sternal wounds and a wound progress assessment chart was introduced into practice. Results in 16 observed patients were encouraging, leading to complete healing and no mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Managing pediatric sternal wounds after cardiac surgery can be streamlined through incorporation of evidence-based current wound care concepts. In addition, the early introduction of advanced care techniques with appropriate surgical closure further improves outcomes. A management pathway for pediatric sternal wounds is beneficial.
ABSTRACT
GENERAL PURPOSE: To present the 2021 update of the Wound Bed Preparation paradigm. TARGET AUDIENCE: This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES: After participating in this educational activity, the participant will: 1. Apply wound assessment strategies. 2. Identify patient concerns about wound care. 3. Select management options for healable, nonhealable, and maintenance wounds.
Wound Bed Preparation is a paradigm to optimize chronic wound treatment. This holistic approach examines the treatment of the cause and patient-centered concerns to determine if a wound is healable, a maintenance wound, or nonhealable (palliative). For healable wounds (with adequate blood supply and a cause that can be corrected), moisture balance is indicated along with active debridement and control of local infection or abnormal inflammation. In maintenance and nonhealable wounds, the emphasis changes to patient comfort, relieving pain, controlling odor, preventing infection by decreasing bacteria on the wound surface, conservative debridement of slough, and moisture management including exudate control. In this fourth revision, the authors have reformulated the model into 10 statements. This article will focus on the literature in the last 5 years or new interpretations of older literature. This process is designed to facilitate knowledge translation in the clinical setting and improve patient outcomes at a lower cost to the healthcare system.
Subject(s)
Education, Continuing , Wounds and Injuries/nursing , Debridement/methods , Humans , Wound Healing/drug effects , Wound Healing/physiologySubject(s)
COVID-19 , Congresses as Topic , Societies, Medical , Wound Healing , Humans , Pandemics , United Arab EmiratesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This article compares the results from a recent pressure ulcer (PU) prevalence audit at the Sheikh Khalifa Medical City (SKMC) hospital in Abu Dhabi to identify the impact of new prevention initiatives introduced around 2013 and establish the effectiveness of PU prevention strategies, judged quality of nursing care, and costs associated with patients developing a hospital-acquired pressure ulcer (HAPU). METHOD: The methods used were based on a previous point prevalence study involving 441 acute care patients, who were assessed using the International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence (IPUP) Survey. Following pre-selection of a 24-hour period for data capture, hospital staff collected PU data. Hill-Rom provided SKMC with an electronic report comprising various epidemiological and financial outputs. RESULTS: PU prevalence was 10.4% in 2018 versus 6.4% in 2013. The 2018 HAPU prevalence was 1.8% versus 2% in 2013. The 2018 findings were in line with IPUP's international benchmarks. In 2018, 99% of patients had their skin assessed and PU risk documented within 24 hours of admission, leading to rapid implementation of a prevention care plan. Most patients who developed a HAPU (n=8) were female (62%) and aged 20-29 years old (25%) or 70-79 years old (25%). All HAPU patients lay on three layers of linen, most on their side (88%) and 75% were hospitalised for >30 days. Costs were estimated for the eight HAPU patients; weighted average cost (per case) was around US$8035.32, giving a total estimated cost of US$64,282.54. Total annual cost (average length of stay basis) for the eight patients was estimated at US$1,830,082.32. CONCLUSION: The PU prevention plan at SKMC proved to be effective, reflected by a low HAPU prevalence rate, suggesting an excellent quality of patient care.
Subject(s)
Nursing Audit/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Audit/trends , Pressure Ulcer/epidemiology , Pressure Ulcer/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Forecasting , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , United Arab Emirates/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Pressure injuries/ulcers are a global health issue, and there is a need for clinicians from many countries and continents to express their opinions on the terminology change (pressure ulcer to injury) and revised staging definitions. A convenience, opinion survey sample of clinicians from the Western Asia Gulf Region enrolled in a yearlong wound care course participated by expressing their opinion about these changes. Results reveal support for the pressure injury terminology and the revised staging definitions.
Subject(s)
Pressure Ulcer/classification , Pressure Ulcer/pathology , Terminology as Topic , Advisory Committees , Crush Injuries/classification , Crush Injuries/pathology , Humans , Pressure Ulcer/therapy , Severity of Illness Index , Skin Care/nursing , Wound HealingSubject(s)
Diabetic Foot/diagnosis , Diabetic Neuropathies/diagnosis , Ischemia/diagnosis , Diabetic Foot/complications , Diabetic Foot/prevention & control , Diabetic Foot/therapy , Diabetic Neuropathies/complications , Diagnostic Errors/prevention & control , Disease Management , Humans , Ischemia/complications , Patient Care Team , Pressure Ulcer/diagnosis , Referral and Consultation , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness IndexSubject(s)
Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Congresses as Topic , Humans , Societies, Medical , United Arab Emirates , Wound HealingABSTRACT
This article builds and expands upon the concept of wound bed preparation introduced by Sibbald et al in 2000 as a holistic approach to wound diagnosis and treatment of the cause and patient-centered concerns such as pain management, optimizing the components of local wound care: Debridement, Infection and persistent Inflammation, along with Moisture balance before Edge effect for healable but stalled chronic wounds.