ABSTRACT
Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are rare with poor prognosis. Due to the advent of genomic sequencing, new data have emerged regarding the molecular makeup of this disease. To add to the complexity, various subtypes also harbor a varied genetic composition. The commonly mutated genes associated with this cancer are KRAS, EGFR, IDH, FGFR and BAP1. Various clinical studies are looking at targeting these genetic mutations. Another therapeutic area of note is the potential for the use of immunotherapy in patients with BTC. Although BTC may be a result of chronic inflammation, this does not necessarily translate into increased immunogenicity. This literature review discusses the diverse molecular and immune-related pathways in patients with BTC and their potential therapeutic implications.
ABSTRACT
There is a well-established link between biliary tract cancers (BTC) and chronic inflammatory conditions such as primary sclerosing cholangitis, chronic cholecystitis, chronic cholelithiasis, liver fluke-associated infestations, and chronic viral hepatic infections. These associated risk factors highlight the potential for development of immune-modulatory agents in this poor-prognostic disease group with limited treatment options. Clinical trials have evaluated the role of immune cells, inflammatory biomarkers, vaccines, cytokines, adoptive cell therapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with BTC. Although these have demonstrated the importance of the immune environment in BTC, currently none of the immune-based therapies have been approved for use in this disease group. The role of immunomodulatory agents is a developing field and has yet to find its way 'from bench to bedside' in BTC.
Subject(s)
Biliary Tract Neoplasms/therapy , Carcinogenesis/immunology , Immunotherapy/methods , Tumor Microenvironment/immunology , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Biliary Tract Neoplasms/immunology , Biliary Tract Neoplasms/pathology , Cancer Vaccines/therapeutic use , Carcinogenesis/pathology , Cholangitis, Sclerosing/immunology , Cholangitis, Sclerosing/pathology , Cholecystitis/immunology , Cholecystitis/pathology , Cholelithiasis/immunology , Cholelithiasis/pathology , Costimulatory and Inhibitory T-Cell Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors , Costimulatory and Inhibitory T-Cell Receptors/immunology , Costimulatory and Inhibitory T-Cell Receptors/metabolism , Disease Progression , Hepatitis, Chronic/immunology , Hepatitis, Chronic/pathology , Humans , Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Signal Transduction/immunologyABSTRACT
Overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR) occurs in >90% of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) and is associated with a poorer prognosis. A systematic review of electronic databases identified studies exploring the addition of EGFR-targeted treatment to chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced (LA)/metastatic PDAC. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of EGFR-targeted therapy were explored using meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Meta-regression was utilised to explore factors associated with improved prognosis (all studies) and benefit from EGFR-targeted therapy (RCTs). Twenty-eight studies (7 RCTs and 21 cohort studies) comprising 3718 patients were included. The addition of EGFR-targeted treatment to chemotherapy did not improve progression-free (pooled hazard ratio (HR): 0.90, p = 0.15) or overall survival (HR: 0.94, p = 0.18). EGFR-targeted therapy was associated with increased treatment-related deaths (pooled odds ratio (OR): 5.18, p = 0.007), and grade (G)3/4 rash (OR: 4.82, p = 0.03). There was a borderline significant increase in G3/4 diarrhoea (OR: 1.75, p = 0.06), but no effect on treatment discontinuation without progression (OR: 0.87, p = 0.25). Neither G3/4 rash nor diarrhoea were associated with increased survival benefit from EGFR-targeted therapy. The effect of EGFR-targeted therapy on overall survival (OS) appeared greater in studies with a greater proportion of LA rather than metastatic patients (R = -0.69, p < 0.001). Further studies in unselected patients with advanced PDAC are not warranted. The benefit from EGFR inhibitors may be limited to patient subgroups not yet clearly defined.
Subject(s)
ErbB Receptors/antagonists & inhibitors , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Databases, Factual , ErbB Receptors/metabolism , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Odds Ratio , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Pancreatic Neoplasms/pathology , Proportional Hazards Models , Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)/genetics , Survival AnalysisABSTRACT
During the last decade, thoracic oncology has witnessed an unprecedented outburst of knowledge regarding molecular biology of non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The implementation of high-throughput sequencing analysis and genomic technologies has led to the identification of novel molecular events that characterize NSCLC transformation and may represent critical oncogenic drivers amenable to targeted therapy. Among these, the presence of activating mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene and of chromosomic rearrangements in the anaplastic-lymphoma kinase (ALK) proto-oncogene, have been the first well characterized genetic alterations with corresponding targeted agents to enter the clinical arena. Nevertheless, in the recent years a number of other oncogenic drivers beyond EGFR and ALK inhibition have emerged as novel molecular targets with potential therapeutic implications, including mutations in the genes KRAS, BRAF, HER2, PI3KCA and DDR2, as well as ROS1 and RET rearrangements and MET, HER2 and FGFR1 gene amplifications. The aim of this review is to provide comprehensive information on the novel therapeutic targets identified by recent preclinical evidence and to discuss developments in molecular treatments targeting these oncogenic drivers or actionable mutations beyond EGFR and ALK in advanced NSCLC.
