Comparative Assessment of the Level of Patient Safety Culture between Surgical and Nonsurgical Units in Bulgarian Hospitals.

Patient safety culture is a key component of the organizational culture and a critical measure of the quality of healthcare. The aim of this study was to gain an insight into the problems concerning patient safety culture, based on the analysis of data, collected after interviewing healthcare specialists working in surgical and nonsurgical units in selected Bulgarian hospitals. This was a cross-sectional online study using a web-platform and the Bulgarian Version of Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture. It was conducted among healthcare workers (n = 620) in 2021. The B-HSOPSC incudes 42 scales grouped in 12 different domains. We compared the percentage of positive ratings and outcome dimensions between surgical and other hospital departments with the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test, χ2 tests, Fisher's Exact Test, and OR. The results showed that there are no statistically significant differences between the ratings on Patient Safety Culture given by the surgical and the nonsurgical staff except for the dimension "Hospital management support for patient safety". Results from the study highlighted that the most important aspect of hospital patient safety is the shortage of medical staff in both surgical and nonsurgical hospital units. Communication, work shift organization, handoffs and transitions between shifts and among different hospital units, as well as communication with line managers were rated as satisfactory in Bulgarian hospitals.

Academic Staff Satisfaction with their Work: A Cross-Sectional Study in a Medical University.

BACKGROUND: Employees' work satisfaction, combined with democratic management, are important predictors of future productivity in any organisation. AIM: The aim of this study is to investigate job satisfaction in academic staff as well as the associated working environment factors, using an original self-administered questionnaire. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using an original standardised questionnaire. It involved 370 academic staff members at one of the five medical universities in Bulgaria. The questionnaire consists of 17 items (including occupational hazards, management style, conflict solving and demographic characteristics) rated on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: The results revealed that the majority of academic staff (71.7%) works in a risky environment. Employees indicate that "mental strain", "work with chemical agents and dust" and "work with biological hazards" are the most common risk factors. Democratic leadership and cooperation are most commonly applied management styles. CONCLUSION: The instrument for the measurement of job satisfaction revealed high values of psychometric characteristics for reliability and validity. The study found a high level of satisfaction of academics with their working conditions. It is necessary to conduct similar studies periodically to detect more precisely the decrease in academic staff work satisfaction and take timely and adequate measures to improve it.

Comparing patient safety culture in Bulgarian, Croatian and American hospitals - preliminary results.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patient safety culture (PSC) is an essential component of the quality of healthcare. Improving PSC is considered a priority in many developed countries. A specialized software platform for registration and evaluation of hospital patient safety culture has been developed with the support of the Medical University Plovdiv Project №11/2017.The aim of the study is to assess the status of PSC in Bulgarian hospitals and to compare it to that in USA and Croatian hospitals. METHODS: The study was conducted from June 01 to July 31, 2018 using the web-based Bulgarian Version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture Questionnaire (B-HSOPSC). Two hundred and forty-eight medical professionals from different hospitals in Bulgaria participated in the study. In order to quantify the differences of positive scores distributions for each of the 42 HSOPSC items between Bulgarian, Croatian and USA samples, the χ2-test was applied. The research hypothesis assumed that there were no significant differences between the Bulgarian, Croatian and US PSCs. RESULTS: The results revealed 14 significant differences in the positive scores between the Bulgarian and Croatian PSCs and 15 between the Bulgarian and the USA PSC, respectively. Bulgarian medical professionals provided less positive responses to 12 items compared with Croatian and USA respondents. The Bulgarian respondents were more positive compared to Croatians on the feedback and communication of medical errors (Items - C1, C4, C5) as well as on the employment of locum staff (A7) and the frequency of reported mistakes (D1). Bulgarian medical professionals were more positive compared with their USA colleagues on the communication of information at shift handover and across hospital units (F5, F7). The distribution of positive scores on items: "Staff worry that their mistakes are kept in their personnel file" (RA16), "Things 'fall between the cracks' when transferring patients from one unit to another" (RF3) and "Shift handovers are problematic for patients in this hospital" (RF11) were significantly higher among Bulgarian respondents compared with Croatian and US respondents. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences of positive scores distribution were found between Bulgarian and USA PSC on one hand and between Bulgarian and Croatian on the other. The study reveals that distribution of positive responses could be explained by the cultural, organizational and healthcare system differences.

Involvement of general practitioners in colorectal cancer voluntary screening campaign: a mixed-methods study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the attitudes and willingness of the general practitioners (GPs) as well as their actual participation in the voluntary colorectal cancer (CRC) screening campaign without additional financial incentives for them, combining quantitative and qualitative approaches. METHODS: A multiple-case practice based study was designed using a mixed method, triangulation techniques and a sequential explanatory design strategy. The study included all 41 GPs practices in the Municipality of Asenovgrad. A questionnaire, face-to-face semi-structured interviews, nonparticipant direct structured observations and documentation review were used to collect data. Variation analysis, alternative analysis for percentage calculation and Mann-Whitney U test to compare two independent groups and Fisher's Exact Test were used. Statistical significance of the null hypothesis was assumed at p<0.05. RESULTS: Older GPs (p=0.015) and those working with a practice nurse (p=0.000) were more inclined to participate in the CRC screening campaign. GPs more knowledgeable of the importance of CRC screening with iFOBT (immunochemical faecal occult blood test), (p=0.002) and those trusting its quality (p=0.007) were more willing and ready to take part in the screening campaign. Among barriers that GPs encountered in the present screening campaign were lack of knowledge and experience about iFOBT, lack of materials and insufficient incentives. CONCLUSION: Some limitations influence the voluntary participation of GPs in CRC screening campaign that have to be considered before decisions can be made on the implementation of population-based CRC screening programme in Bulgaria in accordance with European guidelines on best practice.

Linguistic Validation and Cultural Adaptation of Bulgarian Version of Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC).

BACKGROUND: Patient safety (PS) is one of the essential elements of health care quality and a priority of healthcare systems in most countries. Thus the creation of validated instruments and the implementation of systems that measure patient safety are considered to be of great importance worldwide. AIM: The present paper aims to illustrate the process of linguistic validation, cross-cultural verification and adaptation of the Bulgarian version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (B-HSOPSC) and its test-retest reliability. METHODS: The study design is cross-sectional. The HSOPSC questionnaire consists of 42 questions, grouped in 12 different subscales that measure patient safety culture. Internal con-sistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the split-half method were used; the Spear-man-Brown coefficient was calculated. RESULTS: The overall Cronbach's alpha for B-HSOPSC is 0.918. Subscales 7 Staffing and 12 Overall perceptions of safety had the lowest coefficients. The high reliability of the instrument was confirmed by the Split-half method (0.97) and ICC-coefficient (0.95). The lowest values of Spearmen-Broun coefficients were found in items A13 and A14. CONCLUSION: The study offers an analysis of the results of the linguistic validation of the B-HSOPSC and its test-retest reliability. The psychometric characteristics of the questions revealed good validity and reliability, except two questions. In the future, the instrument will be administered to the target population in the main study so that the psychometric properties of the instrument can be verified.

Feasibility of immunochemical faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in Bulgaria.

PURPOSE: Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is the second most common cancer in Europe. Screening guidelines recommend a range of screening options that include faecal occult blood tests (FOBTs). The efficacy of FOBT-based CRC screening is dependent on the participation rate, thus emphasizing the importance of the latter. This study aimed at analysing the feasibility of CRC screening with immunochemical FOBT (iFOBT). METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 600 asymptomatic persons at average risk, aged ≥45years from urban and rural municipalities was performed. An educational brochure, iFOBT kit with translated colored leaflet, informed consent form and questionnaire were administered to participants by 30 general practitioners. Faecal samples were analysed for occult blood using point-of-care rapid iFOBT (cut off 10 ng(GPs)Hb/ml) by the patients themselves at home. The questionnaire aimed to establish if they encountered difficulties in self-testing and self-analysing. Direct and indirect measures of test feasibility were used difficulties for reported study participation rate. RESULTS: The participation rate was 78.8% (473 participants). Patients < 65 years (x² =70.8, Р<0.001), those with lower education level (x² =82.1, p<0.001), and patients living in villages (x² =4.3, p<0.05) reported difficulties more frequently and they needed help for self-testing by iFOBT. Positive test was found in 8.5% of all participants. Of them 19 persons (48.7%) had haemorrhoids, 8 (20.0%) benign neoplasms, and 3 (7.5%) had CRC. CONCLUSIONS: CRC screening study by means of iFOBT as a point-of-care test proved to be feasible, since a high participation rate was obtained.