Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol ; 15(1): 94-102, 2007 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17536315

ABSTRACT

The 2 methodologies in current clinical use to assess HER2 status in breast cancer are: fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (gene amplification) and immunohistochemistry (protein over-expression). A consistent finding has been that 3% to 15% of breast cancers over-express HER2 protein without evidence for gene amplification. Accurate determination of the HER2 status has implications for selecting patients most likely to respond to trastuzumab. We report here our preliminary experience with a new anti-HER2 rabbit monoclonal antibody, 4B5. The evaluation of HER2 status in 2 different cohorts of breast cancer cases (Single Institution (SI) and Multinational (MN)) with a total of 322 breast cancer cases was performed on an automated staining system (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc, Tucson, AZ) and scored by 3 pathologists (0-3+), for comparison with CB11 staining results (PATHWAY) and FISH (PathVysion). Interlaboratory reproducibility of automated staining results and interpretation was determined on a subset of the SI cohort at 3 separate laboratories. Rabbit monoclonal 4B5 demonstrated sharper membrane staining with less cytoplasmic and stromal background staining than CB11. In the SI cohort, the staining results for 4B5 were highly comparable with those obtained for CB11 with an overall concordance of 93.3%. In the multinational cohort, the overall concordance with CB11 was 84.7%. This lower level of concordance was associated with a much higher overall agreement of 4B5 with FISH (89.5%), compared with agreement of CB11 with FISH (81.2%). The difference in the performance of CB11 in the MN cohort versus the SI cohort may be due to differences in tissue fixation and processing in a centralized, high volume laboratory in an academic medical center versus multiple sites in the international community with potentially nonstandardized techniques. The staining results with 4B5 indicate that it has a more robust performance than CB11 because the correlation of 4B5 with FISH was nearly equivalent (88.2% MN; 89.3% SI) in both cohorts. Interlaboratory reproducibility was also excellent (kappa 1.0). RMoAb 4B5 provides excellent sensitivity, specificity, and interlaboratory reproducibility for the detection of HER2 status in breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/biosynthesis , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis , Animals , Coloring Agents , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry/methods , Immunohistochemistry/standards , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/standards , Methods , Rabbits , Receptor, ErbB-2/immunology , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Breast J ; 13(2): 130-9, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17319853

ABSTRACT

Paxillin, a cytoskeletal focal adhesion adaptor protein, has been shown to be transcriptionally up-regulated and phosphorylated by human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) signaling in vitro. Paxillin expression may also correlate with HER2 amplification in breast cancer patients. In the current study, we sought to explore the relationship further between paxillin expression and clinicopathologic features and clinical outcome in breast cancer. A total of 314 primary invasive breast carcinomas were assessed for paxillin expression via immunohistochemistry. Paxillin immunoreactivity was compared with estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor status, HER2 status by silver in situ hybridization, age, tumor size, stage, Bloom-Richardson grade, nodal status, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Paxillin expression was identified in 27.7% of breast carcinomas as diffuse cytoplasmic staining and the expression correlated with HER2 overexpression (p < 0.001). The influence of paxillin on clinical outcome, in particular the response to chemotherapy, appeared to differ depending on the HER2 status of the tumor. For the subset of HER2 nonamplified cases treated with chemotherapy, patients whose tumor showed a loss of paxillin expression demonstrated a significantly lengthened DFS and OS. In contrast, loss of paxillin expression in the HER2 amplified subset of patients who received chemotherapy correlated with a significantly worse outcome. These data suggest that paxillin up-regulation may be a part of the HER2 pathway in some breast cancers and, furthermore, paxillin expression may also influence the clinical response to chemotherapy, depending upon the HER2 status of a given patient's tumor. Further study of a role for paxillin expression in predicting response to cytotoxic regimens or targeted treatments is warranted.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/metabolism , Paxillin/metabolism , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/genetics , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/mortality , Female , Gene Expression , Genes, erbB-2 , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , In Situ Hybridization/methods , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/genetics , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/metabolism , Retrospective Studies
3.
Am J Surg Pathol ; 30(9): 1097-104, 2006 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16931954

ABSTRACT

Brain metastases (BM) from breast cancer are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In the current study, we have examined a cohort of breast cancer patients who went on to develop BM for clinical-pathologic features and predictive markers that identify this high-risk subgroup of patients at the time of diagnosis. The primary tumors from 55 patients who developed BM were used to construct a tissue microarray. The clinical and pathologic features were recorded and the tissue microarray was stained for estrogen receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, cytokeratin 5/6, and epidermal growth factor receptor by immunohistochemistry. This cohort of patients was compared against a group of 254 patients who remain free of metastases (67 mo mean follow-up), and another cohort of 40 patients who developed mixed visceral and bone metastatic disease without brain recurrence over a similar period of time. Breast cancer patients who went on to develop BM were more likely to be <50 years old (P<0.001), and the primary tumors were more likely to be estrogen receptor negative (P<0.001) and high grade (P=0.002). The primary tumors were also more likely to express cytokeratin 5/6 (P<0.001) and epidermal growth factor receptor (P=0.001), and to overexpress human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (P=0.001). The data presented above suggest a profile for breast cancer patients at increased risk for developing BM. Predictive factors to help identify patients with metastatic breast cancer who are at an increased risk for developing central nervous system recurrence might allow for screening of this population for early detection and treatment or for the development of targeted strategies for prevention.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/secondary , Breast Neoplasms/chemistry , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , ErbB Receptors/analysis , Keratins/analysis , Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis , Receptors, Estrogen/analysis , Female , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Middle Aged
4.
J Clin Oncol ; 24(19): 3039-47, 2006 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16809728

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Patients with breast cancer experience progression and respond to treatment in diverse ways, but prognostic and predictive tools for the oncologist are limited. We have used gene expression data to guide the production of hundreds of novel antibody reagents to discover novel diagnostic tools for stratifying carcinoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred forty novel and 23 commercial antisera, selected on their ability to differentially stain tumor samples, were used to stain paraffin blocks from a retrospective breast cancer cohort. Cox proportional hazards and regression tree analysis identified minimal panels of reagents able to predict risk of recurrence. We tested the prognostic association of these prospectively defined algorithms in two independent cohorts. RESULTS: In both validation cohorts, the Kaplan-Meier estimates of recurrence confirmed that both the Cox model using five reagents (p53, NDRG1, CEACAM5, SLC7A5, and HTF9C) and the regression tree model using six reagents (p53, PR, Ki67, NAT1, SLC7A5, and HTF9C) distinguished estrogen receptor (ER)-positive patients with poor outcomes. The Cox model was superior and distinguished patients with poor outcomes from patients with good or moderate outcomes with a hazard ratio of 2.21 (P = .0008) in validation cohort 1 and 1.88 (P = .004) in cohort 2. In multivariable analysis, the calculated risk of recurrence was independent of stage, grade, and lymph node status. A model proposed for ER-negative patients failed validation in the independent cohorts. CONCLUSION: A panel of five antibodies can significantly improve on traditional prognosticators in predicting outcome for ER-positive breast cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Gene Expression Profiling , Receptors, Estrogen/analysis , Algorithms , Antibodies , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Prognosis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...