Atrial function after percutaneous occluder device and suture-mediated patent fossa ovalis closure.

Aims: Suture-mediated patent fossa ovalis (PFO) closure is a recent technique, achieving closure by means of a simple suture. The differences between traditional occluders and suture might have different impacts on atrial function. The aim of this study was to evaluate atrial function after PFO closure by direct suture and traditional occluders. Methods and results: We prospectively studied 40 patients, 20 undergoing PFO closure by occluder and 20 by suture. Trans-thoracic echocardiography was carried out the day before and 1 year after the procedure. Left atrial (LA) and right atrial (RA) function was evaluated by using speckle-tracking analysis assessing the strain values of the reservoir (st-RES), conduit (st-CD), and contraction phase (st-CT). Compared with values baseline PFO closure, at 1-year follow-up, patients with occluder implantation had significantly worse indices of LA and RA reservoir (LA st-RES P < 0.001; RA st-RES P < 0.001), conduit (LA st-CD P < 0.001; RA st-CD P < 0.001), and contraction function (LA st-CT P < 0.05; RA st-CT P < 0.05). In patients with suture-mediated PFO closure, no significant differences were observed in the same indices of reservoir (LA st-RES P = 0.848; RA st-RES P = 0.183), conduit (LA st-CD P = 0.156; RA st-CD P = 0.419), and contraction function (LA st-CT P = 0.193; RA st-CT P = 0.375). Conclusion: Suture-mediated PFO closure does not alter atrial function. Conversely, PFO closure by metallic occluders is associated with a deterioration of atrial function. This detrimental effect on atrial function could favour the development of atrial arrhythmias.

A new echocardiographic index to select patients for PFO suture-mediated percutaneous closure.

OBJECTIVES: To identify a simple echocardiographic predictor of procedural success to select patient for percutaneous suture-mediated patent fossa ovalis (PFO) closure. BACKGROUND: Percutaneous suture-mediated PFO closure has been shown as a safe and advantageous alternative to device-based PFO closure, yet its overall success is slightly lower in unselected patients. METHODS: Preprocedural transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) of 302 patients (113 men, 45 ± 12 years) who underwent percutaneous suture-mediated PFO closure were reviewed. RESULTS: At echocardiographic follow-up (3-6 months), residual right-to-left shunt (RLS) ≥2 was found in 60 (19.9%) patients. At multivariable analysis, only two anatomical variables measured at preprocedural TEE were found as independent predictors of residual RLS ≥ 2 at follow-up: PFO maximum width (odds ratio [OR] 1.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-3.40, p = 0.02) and PFO minimal septa overlapping (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35-0.88, p = 0.02). An index based on the ratio of PFO maximum width to PFO minimum septal overlapping (W/SO) proved to be the most powerful predictor of RLS ≥ 2 at follow-up (OR 48.1, 95% CI 9.3-352.2, p < 0.01). The ROC curve for the W/SO ratio was found to have an AUC of 0.84 (95% CI 0.75-0.93) and a cut-off value of 0.61 yielding a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 78% with a negative predictive value of 94%. A decision tree methodology's AUC was 0.75 (95% CI 0.67-0.83). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that the ratio between the maximum amplitude of the PFO and the minimum overlap of the septa is the best predictive index of a favorable result by using one stitch only.

Atrial function analysis after percutaneous umbrella device and suture-mediated patent fossa ovalis closure.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is an undesirable event following percutaneous patent fossa ovalis (PFO) closure with metallic occluders, suggesting that implanting a rigid closure device could alter atrial function. Suture-mediated PFO closure is a new technique, achieving closure of the PFO by means of a simple suture. Aim of this study was to evaluate left atrial function after closure of PFO by direct suture and traditional occluders. METHODS: We studied 40 age and sex homogeneous patients, 20 undergoing PFO closure by device (OCL) and 20 by suturing (NS). Twenty healthy sex-age matched subjects made up the control group (CT). Left atrial function was evaluated by using volumetric and speckle-tracking analysis assessing the following parameters: total emptying fraction (EF), Expansion Index (EI), active emptying fraction (AEF), strain values of the reservoir (r-ED), conduit (cd-ED) and contraction phase (ct-ED). RESULTS: Compared to CT and NS, OCL patients had significantly worst indices of left atrial reservoir function (EF P=0.001, EI P=0.003, r-ED P<0.001), conduit function (cd-ED P=0.018) and contraction function (AEF P=0.010; ct-ED P<0.001). No significant differences were observed in left atrial function indices between CT and NS patients. CONCLUSIONS: Suture-mediated PFO closure does not alter left atrial function. Conversely, metallic occluder is associated with worse left atrium function. This detrimental effect on atrial function could favor the development of atrial arrhythmias.