A novel KPC-166 in ceftazidime/avibactam resistant ST307 Klebsiella pneumoniae causing an outbreak in intensive care COVID Unit, Italy.

INTRODUCTION: Aim of the study was the molecular characterization of 21 ceftazidime/avibactam resistant (CZA-R) Klebsiella pneumoniae strains, collected in the period October 2021-March 2022 from an Intensive Care COVID Unit in a Northern Italian Hospital. METHODS: After growth on selective/chromogenic culture media and susceptibility tests assessment, resistance genes content was ascertained for all the isolates by the HybriSpot 12 multiplexing, PCR and Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS). Clonality was assessed by PFGE and MLST according to the Pasteur scheme. A SNPs-based phylogenetic tree was obtained comparing representative isolates and global genomes. The blaKPC gene horizontal transmission was evaluated by conjugation experiments. blaKPC-166 was cloned in a pCR2.1 vector and transformed in chemically competent TOP10 cells. RESULTS: Sixteen inpatients resulted positive for colonization and/or infection by KPC-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) strains. The 21 CZA-R KPC-Kp isolates obtained showed MDR phenotype; susceptibility to meropenem was always retained. All the CZA-R KPC-Kp presented a novel blaKPC variant, named blaKPC-166, showing a single nucleotide substitution (T811C) compared to the blaKPC-94; but related to blaKPC-2. TWO DIFFERENT PULSOTYPES WERE DETECTED: A in 18/21 and B in 1/21 cases, two strains from the same patient being untypable by PFGE. Interestingly, the outbreak was sustained by the high-risk clone ST307, although the ST22, ST6342, ST6418 and ST6811 have also been identified and associated to KPC-166. Worryingly, blaKPC-166 could be transferred horizontally and, after cloning, it conferred resistance to CZA. DISCUSSION: This novel variant confers CZA-resistance and carbapenems susceptibility restoration. As KPC-166 was found expressed by multiple Kp clones, greater efforts should be made to prevent the further dissemination of such strains in Italian clinical settings.

Effectiveness of infection-containment measures on SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and circulation from May to July 2020, in Milan, Italy.

OBJECTIVE: Through a hospital-based SARS-CoV-2 molecular and serological screening, we evaluated the effectiveness of two months of lockdown and two of surveillance, in Milan, Lombardy, the first to be overwhelmed by COVID-19 pandemics during March-April 2020. METHODS: All subjects presenting at the major hospital of Milan from May-11 to July-5, 2020, underwent a serological screening by chemiluminescent assays. Those admitted were further tested by RT-PCR. RESULTS: The cumulative anti-N IgG seroprevalence in the 2753 subjects analyzed was of 5.1% (95%CI = 4.3%-6.0%), with a peak of 8.4% (6.1%-11.4%) 60-63 days since the peak of diagnoses (March-20). 31/106 (29.2%) anti-N reactive subjects had anti-S1/S2 titers >80 AU/mL. Being tested from May-18 to June-5, or residing in the provinces with higher SARS-CoV-2 circulation, were positively and independently associated with anti-N IgG reactivity (OR [95%CI]: 2.179[1.455-3.264] and 3.127[1.18-8.29], respectively). In the 18 RT-PCR positive, symptomatic subjects, anti-N seroprevalence was 33.3% (95% CI: 14.8%-56.3%). CONCLUSION: SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in Milan is low, and in a downward trend after only 60-63 days since the peak of diagnoses. Italian confinement measures were effective, but the risk of contagion remains concrete. In hospital-settings, the performance of molecular and serological screenings upon admission remains highly advisable.

Detection and quantification of SARS-CoV-2 by droplet digital PCR in real-time PCR negative nasopharyngeal swabs from suspected COVID-19 patients.

Since SARS-CoV-2-based disease (COVID-19) spreads as a pandemic, the necessity of a highly sensitive molecular diagnosis that can drastically reduce false negatives reverse transcription PCR (rtPCR) results, raises as a major clinical need. Here we evaluated the performance of a ddPCR-based assay to quantify SARS-CoV-2 titer in 55 suspected COVID-19 cases with negative rtPCR results thanks to in-house ddPCR assay (targeting RdRp and host RNaseP). Samples were collected at ASST-GOM Niguarda between February and May 2020 at hospital admission. Clinical and imaging data were obtained for clinical staging and definition of disease severity. Patients were mainly female (45.5%) with a median age of 73 (57-84) years. ddPCR-based assay detected SARS-CoV-2 genome in nasopharyngeal samples of 19 (34.5%) patients (median viral-load: 128 copies/mL, IQR: 72-345). In 15 of them (78.9%), chest CT showed a classical COVID-19 bilateral interstitial pneumonia; 14 patients (73.7%) showed severe COVID-19 manifestations. ddPCR did not identify any trace of SARS-CoV-2 genome in the respiratory samples of the remaining 36 patients. The serological assay performed in a subgroup of 34 patients at the later stage of illness (from 3 days to 90 days after) confirmed the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in all patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 in ddPCR (100%). Contrariwise, negative tests were observed in 95.0% ddPCR negative patients (P<0.001). Thanks to a ddPCR-based assay, we achieved a rapid and accurate SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis in rtPCR-negative respiratory samples of individuals with COVID-19 suspect, allowing the rapid taking care and correct management of these patients.