Postoperative Complications of Minimally Invasive Intramedullary Nail Fixation Versus Plate Fixation for Distal Fibular Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Double Cohort Study in a Geriatric Trauma Unit in the Netherlands.

Intramedullary fixation using a fibular nail is a minimally invasive alternative to conventional plate fixation that provides superior biomechanical strength and allows immediate full weightbearing postoperatively. The study aim was to compare the postoperative complications of minimally invasive intramedullary fibular nail fixation to plate fixation for Lauge-Hansen supination external rotation type 4 (Weber B) fractures in patients aged 65 years or older treated in a single geriatric trauma unit in the Netherlands. A retrospective cohort study was performed including patients aged 65 years or older with a Lauge-Hansen supination external rotation type 4 (Weber B) fracture treated with either intramedullary fibular fixation or plate fixation between January 2017 and January 2019. A total number of 58 patients were included with a mean age of 73.9 years (range 65-95). The intramedullary fixation-cohort (n = 13) had a significantly higher mean age (82.5 vs 71.4 years, p = .002) and Charlson Co-morbidity Index (4.7 vs 3.6, p = .005) compared to the plate fixation-cohort (n = 45). The total number of postoperative complications was lower after intramedullary fixation (n = 2, 15%) compared to plate fixation (n = 15, 33%), although this relative difference was not significant (p = .307). All 2 complications observed after intramedullary fixation were wound infections demanding no debridement or implant removal. No implant related complications, hospital-acquired complications or mortality were observed after intramedullary fixation. Despite the higher mean age and co-morbidity status of patients treated with minimally invasive intramedullary fibular nailing, the total number of postoperative complications was lower after intramedullary fixation compared to plate fixation. This technique might be a promising alternative in selected patients.

Tibiotalocalcaneal Intramedullary Nailing for Unstable Geriatric Ankle Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) intramedullary nailing has been suggested as an alternative to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for the primary treatment of unstable fragility ankle fractures with a poor soft tissue envelope. This study aims to investigate the clinical efficacy of TTC intramedullary nail fixation for the primary treatment of unstable ankle fractures in frail elderly patients with poor soft tissue condition, by assessing the number of postoperative complications and the patient-reported functional outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed including patients with an unstable ankle fracture treated between 2015 and 2019 with TTC stabilization using a retrograde intramedullary hindfoot nail that was inserted without joint preparation and allowing immediate weight-bearing postoperatively. The primary outcome was the total number of postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 10 patients were included out of 365 operatively treated ankle fractures. The mean age was 85.2 years (range 66-92) with a mean follow-up of 11.2 months (range 6-16). Fracture types included AO/OTA 44-B2 (n = 1), 44-B3 (n = 6), 44-C1 (n = 2) and 44-C3 (n = 1). Postoperative complications were observed in 4 patients (40%), including 3 nonunions, 2 implant related complications and 1 wound infection. No wound healing disorder or below-the-knee amputation was observed. Four patients (40%) deceased between post-operative 6 to 16 months due to medical conditions unrelated to surgery. The mean Foot and Ankle Outcome Score was 52.6 (range 44.2-73.8). CONCLUSION: Hindfoot nailingis a viable treatment option in selected high-risk patients with an advanced age, unstable ankle fractures with significant bone loss, poor soft tissue condition and/or severely impaired pre-injury mobility. In a frail geriatric population, hindfoot nailing may be a safe alternative fixation method with a low risk of wound complication or major amputation. However, unprepared joint may lead to symptomatic nonunion after TTC intramedullary nailing.

Intramedullary Fixation Versus Plate Fixation of Distal Fibular Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies.

Intramedullary fixation (IMF) has been described as a minimally invasive alternative to open reduction and internal fixation for operative treatment of distal fibular fractures in case of compromised soft tissue or severe comorbidities. The objective was to compare postoperative complications and functional outcomes of intramedullary versus plate fixation (PF) in distal fibular fractures. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. The PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases were searched for both randomized controlled trials and observational studies. A total of 26 studies was included, reporting on 1710 patients with a mean age of 51.6 years. Meta-analysis was performed on 8 comparative studies, including subgroup and sensitivity analyses on all outcomes. IMF was associated with significantly fewer wound related complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04 to 0.25; p < .01), implant removals (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.93; p = .03), and nonunions (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.62; p < .01). No differences were found regarding malunion (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.17 to 1.21; p = .11) and the Olerud Molander Ankle Score for long-term functional outcome (mean difference, 9.56; 95% CI, 1.24 to 20.37; p = .08). Results of this study apply to a select group of patients, in which the advantages of minimal soft tissue damage by IMF are preferable to optimal fracture reduction by PF. IMF of distal fibular fractures resulted in fewer wound-related complications, implant removals, and nonunions compared with PF. Especially in elderly patients, patients with chronic comorbidity, and patients with compromised soft tissue, IMF may be preferred over PF.