Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Support Care Cancer ; 29(8): 4723-4732, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33515108

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Palonosetron, a long-acting 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, is an effective antiemetic agent for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting; however, it sometimes causes severe constipation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the severity of palonosetron-related constipation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the incidence and severity of constipation after intravenous administration of 0.75-mg palonosetron in 150 chemotherapy-naïve patients who received first-line chemotherapy at Saga University Hospital. Constipation was classified into grades 1-5 according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with palonosetron-related worsening of constipation to grade 2 or higher. RESULTS: Palonosetron significantly increased the incidence and severity of constipation (incidence: before vs. after palonosetron, 35.4% vs. 74.0%, p < 0.0001, and severity: before vs. after palonosetron, 26.7% and 8.7% in grades 1 and 2, respectively, vs. 46.7%, 23.3%, and 4.0% in grades 1, 2, and 3, respectively, p < 0.0001). Despite the use of laxatives, 4.0% of patients had grade 3 constipation requiring manual evacuation. Combination treatment with aprepitant (odds ratio (OR), 10.9; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3-90.0; p = 0.026) and older age (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01-1.57; p = 0.039) were factors associated with the severity of constipation. CONCLUSION: Constipation was more severe in patients receiving combination treatment with aprepitant than in those treated with palonosetron alone. Older age was also associated with increased risk of severe palonosetron-related constipation. Identification of risk factors can help target risk-based laxative therapy.


Subject(s)
Antiemetics/adverse effects , Constipation/chemically induced , Palonosetron/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
2.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol ; 36(1): 34-37, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32541381

ABSTRACT

Lithium, which is used for bipolar disorder, can cause toxicity. There are two categories of lithium toxicity, namely, overdose-related and not overdose-related. However, the treatment and prognosis of each type of toxicity are not clearly understood. We, therefore, compared the clinical characteristics of patients with overdose-related and not overdose-related lithium toxicity. Relevant data were obtained from the medical records of 16 patients with lithium toxicity, and renal function and concomitant medications were retrospectively compared between the two groups. We also compared the treatment for, manifestations of, and duration of hospitalization between the two types of lithium toxicity. The not overdose-related group more frequently had a low creatinine clearance (<50 mL/min) than did the overdose-related group (P = 0.01). Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that creatinine clearance <50 mL/min was a significant predictor of lithium toxicity in the not overdose-related group (P = 0.01). Tremor and dysarthria occurred only in the not overdose-related group, and duration of hospitalization was significantly longer in the not overdose-related than overdose-related group (P = 0.01). Clinicians must monitor the renal function of patients taking lithium, even when in compliance with the prescribed dosage, because they are at long-term risk of lithium toxicity.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , Kidney , Lithium , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Humans , Kidney/physiology , Lithium/toxicity , Retrospective Studies
3.
Int J Clin Oncol ; 23(5): 974-979, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29651584

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) significantly changed the prognosis of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and clinical trials demonstrated that TKIs can be discontinued in approximately 50% of patients after a period of deep molecular response (DMR). However, in some patients, TKI discontinuation leads to anxiety and depression. Here, we analysed the incidence of anxiety and depression in patients who stop TKI therapy. METHODS: Anxiety and depression were evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in 32 patients with CML. The survey periods were at TKI discontinuation, at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months and at reintroduction of TKIs. The HADS score at the initial TKI discontinuation was compared between patients within and outside clinical trials. Treatment-free remission (TFR) rates outside clinical trials were evaluated. RESULTS: The HADS scores were significantly higher at TKI reintroduction after molecular relapse than at the initial TKI discontinuation (at the initiation of stopping TKIs vs. at reintroduction of TKIs, 8.47 ± 5.53 vs. 1.67 ± 2.26; p = 0.0003). The TFR rate at 12 months after stopping TKIs outside clinical trials was 55.6%. The HADS score at the initial TKI discontinuation did not differ between patients within and outside clinical trials. CONCLUSION: Stopping TKIs outside clinical trials is feasible if the guidelines for stopping are followed and an adequate monitoring system is available. Discontinuation of TKIs requires adequate management of anxiety and depression.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/chemically induced , Depressive Disorder/chemically induced , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/chemically induced , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/antagonists & inhibitors , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome , Withholding Treatment
4.
Yakugaku Zasshi ; 129(5): 537-48, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19420884

ABSTRACT

With the revision of the Good Clinical Practice (GCP) in 1997, the Clinical Trial Center was established at Saga University Hospital in 1999, where clinical research coordinators (CRC) of nurses and pharmacists have been carrying out support for clinical trials since June 2000. At present, two pharmacists, two nurses, and three clerical work assistants support the execution of clinical trials; however, in recent years the number of clinical trial commissions has been gradually decreasing. On this occasion, in order to carry out even higher quality and smoother clinical trials, we conducted a questionnaire targeting the sponsors of clinical trials (head monitors) to evaluate this hospital's system for the execution of clinical trials from the sponsor's standpoint. Moreover, for the purpose of comparison with the systems of other institutions, the same questionnaire was conducted on two other hospitals-the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan and the Social Insurance Shimonoseki Kousei Hospital. The problems of the clinical trial execution in our team turned out lack of knowledge concerning GCP and our complex system from the result of the questionnaire.


Subject(s)
Clinical Trials as Topic , Hospitals , Humans , Japan , Nurses , Pharmacists , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...