ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study measures and compares the outcome of traction, ultrasound, and low-power laser (LPL) therapies by using magnetic resonance imaging and clinical parameters in patients presenting with acute leg pain and low back pain caused by lumbar disc herniation (LDH). METHODS: A total of 60 patients were enrolled in this study and randomly assigned into 1 of 3 groups equally according to the therapies applied, either with traction, ultrasound, or LPL. Treatment consisted of 15 sessions over a period of 3 weeks. Magnetic resonance imaging examinations were done before and immediately after the treatment. Physical examination of the lumbar spine, severity of pain, functional disability by Roland Disability Questionnaire, and Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire were assessed at baseline, immediately after, and at 1 and 3 months after treatment. RESULTS: There were significant reductions in pain and disability scores between baseline and follow-up periods, but there was not a significant difference between the 3 treatment groups at any of the 4 interview times. There were significant reductions of size of the herniated mass on magnetic resonance imaging after treatment, but no differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that traction, ultrasound, and LPL therapies were all effective in the treatment of this group of patients with acute LDH. These results suggest that conservative measures such as traction, laser, and ultrasound treatments might have an important role in the treatment of acute LDH.
Subject(s)
Intervertebral Disc Displacement/diagnosis , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/therapy , Low Back Pain/therapy , Low-Level Light Therapy/methods , Lumbar Vertebrae/physiopathology , Traction/methods , Ultrasonic Therapy/methods , Acute Disease , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/complications , Low Back Pain/etiology , Lumbar Vertebrae/pathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Physical Examination , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Treatment of patients with anterior cervical osteophytes causing dysphagia includes conservative treatment with anti-inflammatory drugs, muscle relaxants, antibiotics, and an appropriate soft diet. Physical therapy with its advantages may be an alternative method in the treatment, which was not reported previously. CASE DESCRIPTION: Phonophoresis therapy is applied in nine patients with dysphagia due to cervical osteophytes. RESULTS: The symptom of dysphagia regressed in various degrees in all patients after phonophoresis therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Phonophoresis might be an alternative method for the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) treatment in patients with dysphagia due to cervical osteophytes.
