ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship (AS) is defined as coordinated interventions to improve and measure the appropriate use of antimicrobial agents. However, available resources for AS differ depending on the size of the clinical setting. Therefore, AS programs based on guidelines need to be selected in order to implement AS in small- to medium-sized hospitals. The present study compared the impact of AS in a 126-bed community hospital between pre- and post-AS periods. METHODS: The present study was retrospectively performed by selecting data on eligible patients from electronic medical records stored in the central database of the hospital. The roles of the AS team included weekly rounds and recommendations on the appropriate use of antimicrobials, and pharmacists working on post-prescription audits and pharmaceutical care at the bedside closely communicated with the AS team to assist with its implementation. As process measurements, the order rate of culture examinations, the conducting rate of de-escalation, antimicrobial use density (AUD), days of therapy (DOT), and the AUD/DOT ratio of carbapenems and tazobactam-piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC) were measured. Thirty-day mortality and recurrence rates were examined as clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 535 patients (288 in the pre-AS period and 247 in the post-AS period) were enrolled in the present study. The recommendation rate to prescribers significantly increased (p < 0.01) from 10.4% in the pre-AS period to 21.1% in the post-AS period. The order rate of culture examinations increased from 56.3 to 73.3% (p < 0.01). The conducting rate of de-escalation increased from 10.2 to 30.8% (p < 0.05). The AUD of carbapenems and TAZ/PIPC significantly decreased (p < 0.05). The DOT of carbapenems (p < 0.01) and TAZ/PIPC (p < 0.05) also significantly decreased. The AUD/DOT ratio of carbapenem significantly increased from 0.37 to 0.60 (p < 0.01). Thirty-day mortality rates were 11.2 and 14.2%, respectively, and were not significantly different. The 30-day recurrence rate significantly decreased (p < 0.05) from 14.7 to 7.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of AS in this hospital improved the appropriate use of antimicrobials without negatively affecting clinical outcomes. These results may be attributed to close communication between pharmacists working on post-prescription audits and pharmaceutical care at the bedside and the AS team.
ABSTRACT
Introduction Paraplegia is a serious complication after thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. The aortic cross-clamp blocks blood flow to the intercostal artery as a feeding blood vessel, so the spinal cord is at risk of being exposed to ischemia. Hypothermia with systemic cooling is a useful means of avoiding spinal ischemia caused by aortic blockade but has various side effects. Theoretically, local cooling by epidural cooling catheter is an effective method to reduce the side effects. However, the use of needle sensors to measure the temperature of the human spinal cord is not ethically applicable in the real clinical field. The purpose of the study is to build computer modeling of human-sized spinal cords and a basic platform for simulating spinal cord cooling. This is being done to prove that local cooling can cool the human spinal cord in the same way, even in human spinal cords larger than laboratory animals. Methods We tried to model a horizontal cross-section of tissue near the spinal cord at a size equivalent to that of an adult human. The tissue around the spinal cord was decomposed into many small matrices for analysis using the finite element method. Next, the analysis was performed using a high-speed computer on the assumption that the matrix exchanges heat with the adjacent matrix over time according to Pennes' bio-heat equation. Repeated calculations were performed on a high-speed computer to calculate temperature changes in the central part of the spinal cord. Result By setting the temperature of the cooling catheter to 20°C, temperatures at the center of the spinal cord after 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 minutes were 34.08°C, 33.64°C, 33.48°C, 33.40°C, and 33.36°C, respectively. After stopping the cooling, the temperature at the center of the spinal cord recovered to baseline temperature within 10 minutes. Conclusion Results were similar to those of previous animal studies using our local cooling system, suggesting that evaluation of cooling catheter's performance by computational simulation (CS) is effective.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Epidural placement of a cooling catheter can protect against ischemic spinal cord injury. With the use of rabbits, we investigated whether this epidural cooling technique, when combined with systemic moderate hypothermia, can protect the spinal cord against ischemic metabolic stress. METHODS: New Zealand white rabbits (n = 28) were assigned to 1 of 4 different groups. Animals underwent abdominal aortic occlusion for 30 minutes using a 3F balloon catheter. Group 1 (n = 7) underwent epidural cooling by the catheter and systemic moderate hypothermia (35 °C) induced with a cooling blanket. Group 2 (n = 7) underwent epidural cooling under systemic normothermia (38.5 °C). Group 3 (n = 7) underwent systemic moderate hypothermia (35 °C) without epidural cooling. Group 4 (n = 7) underwent neither epidural nor blanket cooling as a negative control. Neurologic status of their hind limbs was graded according to the modified Tarlov scale at 1, 2, and 7 days after surgery. RESULTS: During infrarenal aortic ischemia, epidural temperature was significantly lower in group 1 (18.5 °C ± 0.8 °C) than in group 2 (28.6 °C ± 1.0 °C; P = .0001), group 3 (34.2 °C ± 0.06 °C; P = .0001), or group 4 (38.5 °C ± 0.2 °C; P = .0001). Hind limb function recovery was greater in group 1 (mean Tarlov score, 4.9 ± 0.057) than in group 2 (2.6 ± 0.3; P = .0028), group 3 (2.1 ± 0.34; P = .0088), or group 4 (0.0 ± 0.0; P = .0003). CONCLUSIONS: Epidural cooling catheter combined with systemic moderate hypothermia produced additive cooling ability and protected the spinal cord against ischemia in rabbits more effectively than either intervention alone.
