Defining Reference Values for the Normal Adult Lisfranc Joint Using Weightbearing Computed Tomography.

The uninjured contralateral feet of consecutive patients undergoing cone-beam weightbearing computed tomography for acute Lisfranc injury between July 2017 and October 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Of these, any cases with history or radiological evidence of trauma to the Lisfranc interval were excluded. The area of the non-weightbearing (NWBA) and weightbearing (WBA) Lisfranc joint was calculated (in mm2) using a novel technique. Area difference (AD) was calculated as WBA-NWBA. Area ratio (AR) was calculated as WBA/NWBA. A subset of cases was double-measured by 2 technologists to evaluate inter- and intraobserver variability. A total of 91 patients aged 15 to 74 years were included in the study. The measurement technique was reproducible with excellent intraobserver correlation (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.998, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.996-0.999) and high interobserver correlation (ICC: 0.964, CI: 0.939-0.979). The median NWBA was 83 (range 52-171) and median WBA was 86 (range 52-171). Median AD was 1 mm2 (range -3 to 10) and median AR was 1.01 (range 0.96-1.11). No significant difference was identified in AD or AR when adjusted for age, gender, patient-weight or weight put through the foot. Both AD and AR distributions were highly skewed toward 0 and 1, respectively. Based on 95% CI, normal reference range for AD is -1 to 7 mm2 and for AR is 0.98 to 1.09. Absolute area of the Lisfranc joint is highly variable between individuals. The Lisfranc joint is rigid with little to no physiologic widening in most subjects. The normal upper limit of widening of the Lisfranc area on weightbearing was 9%. Differences in age, sex, patient-weight or weight put through the foot were not significantly associated with the extent of joint widening.

Weightbearing Cone-Beam Computed Tomography of Acute Ankle Syndesmosis Injuries.

Syndesmotic injuries are common, but only a subset of these injuries are unstable. A noninvasive tool for identifying instability would aid in the selection of patients for surgery. Weightbearing computed tomography (CT) data have been reported for healthy patients, but there are limited data on unstable syndesmoses. We evaluated the syndesmotic area of arthroscopically proven unstable ankles after acute injury. This is a prospective comparative study of consecutive patients recruited to a weightbearing CT database. Thirty-nine patients were included for analysis with arthroscopically proven unstable syndesmoses and an uninjured contralateral ankle. The syndesmosis area was measured for both ankles, in non-weightbearing and weightbearing positions, and compared. Syndesmosis area of the unstable ankle was significantly greater than the uninjured ankle of the same patient, by a mean of 22.9 ± 10.5 mm2. This was a significantly greater difference than that observed with non-weightbearing CT (9.8 ± 10.2 mm2, p < .001). Dynamic change in area, from non-weightbearing to weightbearing, of the unstable ankle (13.7% [16.6 ± 9.9 mm2]) was significantly greater than that of the uninjured ankle (3.1% [3.4 ± 6.7 mm2], p < .001). The intraobserver and interobserver correlations were good with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.983 and 0.970, respectively. Weightbearing CT demonstrated significantly greater diastasis in unstable ankles than did conventional non-weightbearing CT. Syndesmosis area measurement was reliable and reproducible. Dynamic change in area and weightbearing comparison with the contralateral uninjured ankle are 2 parameters that may prove useful in the future for predicting syndesmotic instability.

Dynamic assessment of sternoclavicular joint instability using four-dimensional computed tomography.

Chronic post-traumatic sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) instability can be debilitating and result in restriction of normal daily activities. The diagnosis can be difficult to make clinically or with the use of static imaging modalities. Wide-volume dynamic four-dimensional computed tomography (4D CT) can confidently diagnose chronic post-traumatic SCJ instability. This can aid surgeons in pre-operative planning and help to triage patients into surgical or non-surgical candidates. We propose that 4D CT to be a routine pre-operative imaging in patients with chronic post-traumatic SCJ instability.

Interobserver and intraobserver variability of glenoid track measurements.

BACKGROUND: A method of assessing combined glenoid and humeral bone loss in traumatic shoulder instability with an associated treatment protocol was recently published. The aim of this study was to investigate its reliability and reproducibility. METHODS: Seventy-one patients with unilateral anteroinferior shoulder instability underwent computed tomography scans, from which 3-dimensional images were derived. En face views of both glenoid fossae and with 3 views of the humeral head were provided to 4 assessors to determine interobserver reliability. From these measurements, the shoulder was assigned a treatment classification. Two observers repeated their assessments 1 month later to determine intraobserver reliability. For each measurement, the mean coefficient of variability was calculated. RESULTS: Assessment of glenoid bone loss showed good interobserver (4 observers agreeing in 90.1% of cases) and also good intraobserver agreement (94% and 96%). There was a poor level of interobserver reliability regarding the on-track or off-track classification (72%). Intraobserver reliability for this measurement was less variable (90% and 80%). There was a poor level of agreement between observers (65%) regarding treatment classification. The coefficient of variability for the Hill-Sachs lesion measured 19.2%, indicating a high level of variability for this measurement compared with <4% for all other measures. CONCLUSION: Linear bone loss on the glenoid can be measured reliably and reproducibly; however, evaluation of Hill-Sachs lesions demonstrates a high level of variability, and poor interobserver reliability.