ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: SwiftScan single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is a recently released scanning technique with data acquired when the detector is stationary and when it moves from one view to the next. The influence of scan time for using SwiftScan on quantitative bone SPECT remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the effect of the scan time for SwiftScan SPECT on the image quality and quantification of bone SPECT compared to step and shoot mode (SSM) using 99mTc-filled anthropomorphic phantom (SIM2 bone phantom). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Phantom SPECT/computed tomography (CT) images were acquired using Discovery NM/CT 860 (GE Healthcare) with a low-energy high-resolution sensitivity collimator. We used the fixed parameters (subsets 10 and iterations 5) for reconstruction. The coefficient of variation (CV), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), full width at half maximum (FWHM), and quantitative value of SwiftScan SPECT and SSM were compared at various acquisition times (5, 7, 17, and 32 min). RESULTS: In the short-time scan (< 7 min), the CV and CNR of SwiftScan SPECT were better than those of SSM, whereas in the longtime scan (> 17 min), the CV and CNR of SwiftScan SPECT were similar to those of SSM. The FWHMs for SwiftScan SPECT (13.6-14.8 mm) and SSM (13.5-14.4 mm) were similar. The mean absolute errors of quantitative values at 5, 7, 17, and 32 min were 38.8, 38.4, 48.8, and 48.1, respectively, for SwiftScan SPECT and 41.8, 40.8%, 47.2, and 49.8, respectively, for SSM. CONCLUSIONS: SwiftScan on quantitative bone SPECT provides improved image quality in the short-time scan with quantification similar to or better than SSM. Therefore, in clinical settings, using SwiftScan SPECT instead of the SSM scan protocol in the short-time scan might provide higher-quality diagnostic images than SSM. Our results could provide vital information on the use of SwiftScan SPECT.
ABSTRACT
The quality control of liquid-crystal display (LCD) monitors has become one of the important topics for maintaining reliable soft-copy readings in the interpretation of diagnostic images. In this paper, the effects of correction in the luminance measurement of an LCD monitor by use of a telescopic-type luminance meter were investigated. The luminance of the LCD monitor in different ambient-lighting conditions was measured and compared to the results obtained with no ambient lighting (0 lux). The reproducibility of luminance measurements and luminance ratios without a baffled tube was lower than those measured with the baffled tube due to the effect of ambient light. These tendencies were obvious at a relatively low luminance. The correction method by subtraction of the reflected ambient light on the surface of the LCD monitor and the stray light of the telescopic-type luminance meter from the measured luminance was examined. We found that the correction was able to bring the luminance close to that measured with the baffled tube.
