The Quality of Sex Life Among Patients Before and After Lung Transplantation: A Single-Center Study.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation (LTx) is the only effective method of treatment for patients with end-stage lung diseases; LTx prolongs and increases the quality of life (QoL). An important aspect of QoL that changes in the course of severe diseases is the quality of sex life. This aspect is yet to be discussed in relationship to LTx. We aim to compare patients' quality of sex life at the qualification process with patients' who underwent LTx. METHODS: The studied group consisted of 100 patients (24 women before and 16 after LTx, 39 men before and 21 after LTX) who were admitted to the lung transplantology department for qualification or to control the function after LTx. To assess the patients' quality of sex life, we used The Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire (CSFQ) and World Health Organization (WHO) QoL-BREF. To assess lung function, patients underwent a 6-Minute-Walk-Test (6MWT). RESULTS: Patients after LTx obtained higher results-compared to patients qualified for LTx-in the WHO QoL-BREF in every domain (somatic, psychological, social, and environment). Men after LTx got more points in every domain and better total score (53 ± 5.62 vs 44.23 ± 10.28 point; P < .05) in CSFQ. Women before and after LTx obtained comparable results in CSFQ. Results of 6-Minute-Walk-Test were better among patients after LTx than in qualified patients (523.62 ± 95.71 vs 333.14 ± 145.38 and 524.12 ± 56.17 vs 317.20 ± 141.6, respectively for men and women). CONCLUSIONS: Patients after LTx show better pulmonary function and quality of sex life than qualified. Preliminary results encourage us to conduct research on a larger group.

Assessment of Quality of Life Among Patients After Lung Transplantation: A Single-Center Study.

INTRODUCTION: Lung transplantation (LTx) is the only effective method of treatment to improve the health and quality of life (QoL) of patients with end-stage lung diseases. After LTx, medical examination accompanied by quality of life assessment should be performed on routine follow-up visits. The aim of the study was to assess the QoL of patients after LTx. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 60 patients (29 women and 31 men); 20 patients received single lung transplantation (SLT), and 40 received double lung transplantation (DLT). To determine the patient's QoL, the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), the World Health Organization Quality of Life Test-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF), and the Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) were used. Spirometry and the 6-minute walk test were analyzed to examine efficiency of transplanted organs. RESULTS: In SGRQ there are differences between patients with cystic fibrosis and interstitial lung disease in symptom domain (20.28% vs 39.26%, P = .025) and total score (19.38% vs 32.47%, P = .028). As reported in the GHQ, men had worse overall results than women in sten scale (5.22 points vs 4.69 points). Patients after SLT achieved similar scores in every questionnaire. CONCLUSION: Studies assessing QoL should be an important addition to lung function tests and an integral part of control during postoperative follow-up visits. This study is one of the important contributions to understanding of how essential QoL is after LTx. The authors of this study realize that their work does not cover the whole issue, and further studies in this area are warranted.

Single Lung Transplant vs Double Lung Transplant: A Single-Center Experience With Particular Consideration for Idiopathic Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplant remains the only viable treatment for certain patients with end-stage lung diseases. Such patients can become either single or double lung recipients. The 2 procedures are associated with specific risks and benefits. The aim of the study was to assess the survival of patients after lung transplant in a single center. METHODS: The retrospective study consists of 128 lung transplant recipients. Patients underwent transplant between 2004 and 2017 because of following diseases: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (28.2%), cystic fibrosis (26.5%), and primary pulmonary hypertension (12.3%), including idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension and interstitial lung diseases (33%). Patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension were not treated with postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as left heart conditioning. RESULTS: Regardless of underlying disease, 75% of DLT recipients and 51% of SLT recipients reached 5-year survival (P = .0066). A total of 87% of lung transplant recipients with cystic fibrosis reached 1-year survival. Among lung recipients with primary pulmonary hypertension who underwent DLT and SLT, 5-year survival was reached by 84% and 51%, respectively (P = .025). Among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 82% of DLT recipients and 62% of SLT recipients reached 1-year survival (P = .22). Patients who received transplants because of primary pulmonary hypertension presented the worst short-term survival among all SLT recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CF have the best overall survival among all lung transplant recipients. Double lung transplant provides statistically significantly better outcomes than single lung transplant. This observation is also present among recipients who underwent transplant because of primary pulmonary hypertension, as single lung transplant is not recommended among such patients in particular.

Retrospective cohort study of patients qualified for lung transplantation due to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis - single-centre experience.

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic and progressive disease. Pharmacological treatment can only slow its progression. However, lung transplantation (LTx) is the only treatment for patients with its end-stage form. This study analysed the long-term results of the qualification process of patients with IPF recruited for LTx in a single centre. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 84 patients (56 patients who died while on the waiting list and 28 patients who underwent LTx) with end-stage IPF who were qualified for LTx between 2006 and 2017 at the Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases (Zabrze, Poland). RESULTS: Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that the only parameter was 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance, which statistically significantly impacted the probability of receiving a graft (parameter assessment, 0.00523; p = 0.006; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.0015-0.009; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.005) as well as that of death while on the waiting list (parameter assessment, -0.0054; p = 0.003; 95% CI: -0.009- (-0.0017); HR = 0.995). Patients with a 253-350-m 6MWT distance had 3 times greater risk of dying while on the waiting list than those who walked more than 350 m. Other factors, such as height, sex, and blood group, also influenced the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The 6-minute walk test distance is an independent predictor of mortality on the lung transplant waiting list. Blood type and height also play a significant role in becoming a lung recipient.

Secondary Pulmonary Hypertension Among Patients Qualified for Lung Transplantation: Single-Center Study.

INTRODUCTION: Secondary pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a serious complication of end-stage lung disease and is associated with unfavorable prognosis. The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence and severity of secondary PH among patients qualified for lung transplantation (LTx). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 143 patients qualified for LTx between 2004 and 2019. Analyzed medical records included results collected during the qualification process (eg, echocardiography parameters, right heart catherization [RHC]). There were 37.8% (n = 54) of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), 58.7% (n = 84) of patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), and 3.5% (n = 5) of patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE). The inclusion criteria were ILDs, COPD or CPFE diagnosis, and the presence of RHC data preformed during qualification for LTx. The exclusion criteria were lack of RHC results and diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary artery hypertension, pulmonary artery hypertension associated with connective tissue disease, cystic fibrosis, or bronchiectasis. RESULTS: PH was detected among 60.1% (n = 86) of patients qualified for LTx. The prevalence of PH was 39% (n = 18) vs 76.19% (n = 64) in the COPD vs ILDs groups, respectively. Both ILDs and COPD patients presented with similar mean artery pulmonary pressure (36.3 ± 9.61 vs 34.78 ± 11.47 mm Hg; not statistically significant). Severe PH was more frequent in the ILDs group than in the COPD group (60.94% vs 38.89%). CONCLUSIONS: PH is commonly diagnosed in patients with chronic lung diseases qualified for LTx and more often observed among patients qualified because of ILDs. It is important to assess the pulmonary pressure because of frequent occurrence of PH among patients referred for LTx.

Cystic Fibrosis: From Qualification to Lung Transplantation, a Single Center Experience.

BACKGROUND Cystic fibrosis (CF) is congenital multisystem disorder, that leads to gradual deterioration of pulmonary function. Advancements in therapy of CF-related lung disease have delayed its progression. However, lung transplantation remains the only therapeutic option for majority of such patients. Aim of the study was to assess qualification process and outcome of lung transplantation as a treatment of CF patients qualified in a single center between 2011 and 2018. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective study assessed 41 patients who were qualified to be treated by means of lung transplantation due to CF in Lung Transplant Program of Silesian Center for Heart Diseases between 2011 and 2018. Analysis of patients during qualification process and after lung transplantation was performed. Lung recipients were observed during 1-year follow-up by means of pulmonary function tests. RESULTS 1-year survival was noted among 80% of the patients; 3-year survival and 5-year survival were noted among 70% of the recipients. Mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) increased after lung transplantation: 21.19% at qualification; and 76.67% at 12 months after lung transplantation. Mean forced vital capacity (FVC) results also improved: 34.18% at qualification and 78.34% at 12 months after lung transplantation. The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) before and after treatment noted an increase of 175.55 m. CONCLUSIONS Lung transplantation improves respiratory capacity of CF patients and prolongs their life.

Lung transplantation as a viable option of treatment for pulmonary veno-occlusive disease.

Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) is a rare form of pulmonary hypertension caused by alteration of pulmonary veins. Many clinical and hemodynamic similarities to idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension (IPAH) may cause diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties. This case report is about a patient with PVOD, whose first symptoms of the disease occurred after infectious mononucleosis. Patient was administered with prostacycline (PGI2) mimetic (Treprostinil), what made qualification process and lung transplantation possible. Despite more and more knowledge about causes, ethiopathogenesis and changes in pulmonary veins on molecular level, lung transplantation is the only successful therapeutic option for patients suffering from PVOD.