Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Tech Coloproctol ; 23(3): 267-271, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30963345

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is no demonstrated benefit of high-tie versus low-tie vascular transections in low rectal cancer surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of high tie and low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery on colonic length. METHODS: This study was conducted in a surgical anatomy research laboratory. Anatomical dissections were performed on 11 human cadavers. We performed full left colonic mobilization, section of the descending-sigmoid junction, and high and low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery. Distance from the proximal colon limb to the lower edge of the pubis symphysis was recorded after each step of vascular division. Three measurements were successively performed: before vascular section, after inferior mesenteric artery ligation, and after inferior mesenteric artery and vein section. RESULTS: Before vascular section, the mean distance between colonic end and lower edge of the symphysis pubis was - 1.9 ± 3.5 cm. After combined artery and vein section, the mean distance was + 10.7 ± 4.6 cm for high tie and + 1.5 ± 3 cm for low tie. A limitation of this study is the use of embalmed anatomical specimens, rather than live patients, and the small number of specimens. This study also does not evaluate colon limb vascularization or the impact of proximal lymph node dissection on survival rates. CONCLUSIONS: High tie of the inferior mesenteric artery at its aortic origin allows a gain of extra length of about 9 cm over low tie.


Subject(s)
Colectomy/methods , Colon/surgery , Ligation/methods , Mesenteric Artery, Inferior/surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colon, Sigmoid/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Visc Surg ; 153(4 Suppl): 33-43, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27519150

ABSTRACT

For the last 20 years, nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt hepatic trauma (BHT) has been the initial policy whenever this is possible (80% of cases), i.e., in all cases where the hemodynamic status does not demand emergency laparotomy. NOM relies upon the coexistence of three highly effective treatment modalities: radiology with contrast-enhanced computerized tomography (CT) and hepatic arterial embolization, intensive care surveillance, and finally delayed surgery (DS). DS is not a failure of NOM management but rather an integral part of the surgical strategy. When imposed by hemodynamic instability, the immediate surgical option has seen its effectiveness transformed by development of the concept of abbreviated (damage control) laparotomy and wide application of the method of perihepatic packing (PHP). The effectiveness of these two conservative and cautious strategies for initial management is evidenced by current experience, but the management of secondary events that may arise with the most severe grades of injury must be both rapid and effective.


Subject(s)
Liver/injuries , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/therapy , Embolization, Therapeutic , Hemorrhage/therapy , Humans , Intra-Abdominal Hypertension , Liver Diseases/therapy , Peritoneal Diseases/therapy , Postoperative Care , Reoperation , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/complications , Wounds, Nonpenetrating/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...