Vaso-Occlusive Crises in Sickle Cell Trait Patients With Blood Loss Anemia: A Report of Two Cases.

This report of two cases confronts the longstanding perception of Sickle Cell Trait (SCT) as a clinically benign condition, highlighting its complex and severe clinical manifestations, particularly in the context of blood loss anemia and vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs). The hallmark of sickle cell disease is the severe pain caused by acute vaso-occlusion of the microvasculature that leads to bone marrow infarction. We report two cases of patients with SCT and severe anemia in the setting of blood loss secondary to uterine fibroids subsequently causing VOCs with likely bone sequestration. The occurrence of VOCs in SCT, while infrequent, can be serious and demands a high index of suspicion, particularly when patients appear in significant distress and cardiac or vascular etiologies are ruled out as a source. Reversal of anemia in this case provided quick resolution to symptoms, and we recommend other clinicians not disregard a differential of VOC in SCT carriers, and urge to treat patients as they would if they had sickle cell disease. This report challenges the conventional view of SCT as a condition of clinical benignity, calling for a recalibration in the clinical understanding, management strategies, and focus on this genetic trait under similar circumstances.

Disparities in Women With Endometriosis Regarding Access to Care, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management in the United States: A Scoping Review.

Endometriosis is a benign gynecological condition that elicits chronic pain in 2-10% of reproductive-age women in the United States and exists in approximately 50% of women with infertility. It creates complications such as hemorrhage and uterine rupture. Historically, the gynecologic symptoms of endometriosis have been associated with economic strain and inferior quality of life. It is suspected that endometriosis diagnosis and treatment are affected by health disparities throughout gynecological care. The goal of this review was to collate and report the current evidence on potential healthcare disparities related to endometriosis diagnosis, treatment, and care across race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. This scoping review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and searched the Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Medline Ovid, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, and PsycInfo databases for relevant articles on the topic. Eligibility was established a priori to include articles written in English, published between 2015-2022, and reported on cohort, cross-sectional, or experimental studies conducted in the United States. Initially, 328 articles were found, and after screening and quality assessment, four articles were retained for the final review. Results indicated that White women had higher rates of minimally invasive procedures versus open abdominal surgeries than non-White women. White women also had fewer surgical complications compared to all other races and ethnicities. Black women had higher rates of perioperative complications, higher mortality, and spent more time in the perioperative stage than any other race or ethnicity. In the management of endometriosis, the limited research available showed that all non-White women encountered an increased risk of perioperative and postoperative complications compared to White women. More research is needed to explore diagnostic and treatment disparities beyond surgical management, socioeconomic barriers, and improved representation of racial and ethnic minority women.