Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Adolescence ; 27(108): 833-48, 1992.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1471563

ABSTRACT

Female athletes have been identified as a potential risk group for the development of eating disorders. Although adolescents in general are particularly vulnerable to the onset of eating disorders, little research has examined the problem among high school female athletes. The present study explored this population by comparing female athletes and nonathletes in terms of (a) behavioral and psychological traits associated with eating disorders and (b) use of pathogenic weight control techniques (laxatives, vomiting, fasting, and diet aids). Sport-by-sport comparisons were also investigated to determine if athletes in specific sports were more at risk. Moreover, in an attempt to link athletic participation and eating disordered behavior, the gender-role orientation of athletes was examined. Results indicated that (a) athletes were more likely than nonathletes to possess certain behavioral and psychological correlates of eating disorders, (b) there were few differences among the various sport teams, and (c) gender-role orientation was generally not a critical variable. Although group comparisons yielded limited significant differences, athletes nevertheless reported traits associated with eating disorders as well as use of pathogenic weight control techniques. The unique contributions of the sport context and coaching practices exacerbating disordered eating are discussed.


Subject(s)
Feeding and Eating Disorders/psychology , Sports , Adolescent , Anorexia Nervosa/diagnosis , Anorexia Nervosa/psychology , Body Image , Bulimia/diagnosis , Bulimia/psychology , Diet, Reducing/psychology , Feeding and Eating Disorders/diagnosis , Female , Gender Identity , Humans , Personality Inventory/statistics & numerical data , Psychometrics , Risk Factors
2.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse ; 16(1-2): 77-95, 1990.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2330938

ABSTRACT

Social bonding theory explains less serious drug use better than use of hard drugs. The difference in prediction may be due to the omission of intervening variables between the bond and serious drug use, such as experience with minor drugs. In this study the impact of the social bond on amphetamine use is examined among a national sample of high school senior women. Included in the model is the notion of drug progression, in which individuals first use minor drugs and progress to illicit drugs. To ascertain whether the bond is mediated through use of less serious drugs, cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana are utilized in the analysis. Among the bonding variables, religious commitment has the only significant direct effect on amphetamines. Overall, elements of the bond explain less variance in amphetamines than in cigarettes, alcohol, and marijuana. Combining drug progression with social bonding theory substantially increases the explained variance of amphetamines.


Subject(s)
Amphetamine , Object Attachment , Social Behavior , Social Conformity , Social Identification , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology , Adolescent , Alcohol Drinking/psychology , Female , Humans , Life Style , Marijuana Abuse/psychology , Parent-Child Relations , Peer Group , Personality Development , Personality Tests , Smoking/psychology , Social Values
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...