[Teaching pain management. An innovative curriculum model at the University of Witten/Herdecke (UWH)]. / Schmerztherapie in der Lehre. Ein innovatives Curriculumsmodell an der Universität Witten/Herdecke (UWH).

BACKGROUND: The subject of pain and pain therapy is not mandatory in medical curricula in Germany. Therefore, the German Society for the Study of Pain (DGSS) has developed a core-curriculum for pain and suggested its implementation for all medical faculties. METHOD: At the University of Witten/Herdecke this DGSS core curriculum was extended in terms of a "pain week", which comprised 22 h of seminars and clinical teaching and started in 2009. The knowledge gained by the students regarding the intended learning issues was measured by a pre-post self-assessment questionnaire. RESULTS: In almost every category the students reported significant knowledge gain. The learning issues were rated as relevant for the professional career. CONCLUSION: The "pain week" is intended to be a constant part of the medical curriculum at the University of Witten/Herdecke in the future. It will be integrated into the new cross-sectional subject of palliative care and be assessed by examinations.

[Relevance and barriers of physician empathy in daily practice - current state of research and qualitative survey of physicians]. / Bedeutung und Barrieren ärztlicher Empathie im Praxisalltag - Stand der Forschung und qualitative Kurzumfrage mit Ärzten.

AIMS OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to investigate the relevance and the barriers of physician empathy in medical rehabilitation by conducting a narrative literature review and a qualitative survey in physicians. METHODS: First, we described the current state of research of physician empathy in medical rehabilitation based on a narrative (non-systematic) review of the literature. Additionally, the questions of relevance and barriers of physician empathy were examined in a qualitative short survey with physicians from Rehabilitation Medicine, Internal Medicine, Pediatric and Family Medicine. The qualitative data were analyzed according to the summarizing content analysis of Mayring. RESULTS: Only n=13 studies of physician empathy were conducted in Rehabilitation Medicine; of those, just a few were from Germany and a small number investigated the influence of empathy on patient health outcomes. The qualitative survey's results regarding the definition, patient outcomes and barriers of physician empathy are similar to other theoretical and empirical studies on those issues. Moreover, they show many new, practical aspects, particularly in the field of barriers of physician empathy. CONCLUSION: Although physician empathy has been shown to be an outcome-relevant factor in acute health care, less attention has been paid to it in Rehabilitation research. Physicians from Rehabilitation Medicine, Internal Medicine, Pediatric and Family Medicine perceive empathic behavior also as an outcome-relevant ability, which is particularly hindered by time pressure and stress but also by personal and patient-specific factors.